Ethnicity, Social Support and Oral Health Among English Individuals.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Community dental health Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI:10.1922/CDH_00277Amininia07
M Amininia, E Bernabe, E K Delgado-Angulo
{"title":"Ethnicity, Social Support and Oral Health Among English Individuals.","authors":"M Amininia,&nbsp;E Bernabe,&nbsp;E K Delgado-Angulo","doi":"10.1922/CDH_00277Amininia07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether social support explains ethnic inequalities in oral health among English individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 42704 individuals across seven ethnic groups in the Health Survey for England (1999-2002 and 2005) were analysed. Oral health was indicated by self-reports of edentulousness and toothache. Social support was indicated by marital status and a 7-item scale on perceived social support. Confounder-adjusted regression models were fitted to evaluate ethnic inequalities in measures of social support and oral health (before and after adjustment for social support).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 10.4% of individuals were edentulous and 21.7% of dentate individuals had toothache in the past 6 months. Indian (Odd Ratio: 0.50, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.32-0.78), Pakistani (0.50, 95%CI: 0.30-0.84), Bangladeshi (0.29, 95%CI: 0.17-0.47) and Chinese (0.42, 95%CI: 0.25-0.71) individuals were less likely to be edentulous than white British individuals. Among dentate participants, Irish (1.21, 95%CI: 1.06-1.38) and black Caribbean individuals (1.37, 95%CI: 1.18-1.58) were more likely whereas Chinese individuals (0.78, 95%CI: 0.63-0.97) were less likely to experience toothache than white British individuals. These inequalities were marginally attenuated after adjustment for marital status and perceived social support. Lack of social support was associated with being edentulousness and having toothache whereas marital status was associated with edentulousness only.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings did not support the mediating role of social support in the association between ethnicity and oral health. However, perceived lack of social support was inversely associated with worse oral health independent of participants' sociodemographic factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":10647,"journal":{"name":"Community dental health","volume":"40 1","pages":"60-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dental health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/CDH_00277Amininia07","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether social support explains ethnic inequalities in oral health among English individuals.

Methods: Data from 42704 individuals across seven ethnic groups in the Health Survey for England (1999-2002 and 2005) were analysed. Oral health was indicated by self-reports of edentulousness and toothache. Social support was indicated by marital status and a 7-item scale on perceived social support. Confounder-adjusted regression models were fitted to evaluate ethnic inequalities in measures of social support and oral health (before and after adjustment for social support).

Results: Overall, 10.4% of individuals were edentulous and 21.7% of dentate individuals had toothache in the past 6 months. Indian (Odd Ratio: 0.50, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.32-0.78), Pakistani (0.50, 95%CI: 0.30-0.84), Bangladeshi (0.29, 95%CI: 0.17-0.47) and Chinese (0.42, 95%CI: 0.25-0.71) individuals were less likely to be edentulous than white British individuals. Among dentate participants, Irish (1.21, 95%CI: 1.06-1.38) and black Caribbean individuals (1.37, 95%CI: 1.18-1.58) were more likely whereas Chinese individuals (0.78, 95%CI: 0.63-0.97) were less likely to experience toothache than white British individuals. These inequalities were marginally attenuated after adjustment for marital status and perceived social support. Lack of social support was associated with being edentulousness and having toothache whereas marital status was associated with edentulousness only.

Conclusion: The findings did not support the mediating role of social support in the association between ethnicity and oral health. However, perceived lack of social support was inversely associated with worse oral health independent of participants' sociodemographic factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英语个体的种族、社会支持与口腔健康
目的:探讨社会支持能否解释英语人群口腔健康的种族差异。方法:分析1999-2002年和2005年英国健康调查中来自7个民族的42704人的数据。口腔健康状况以牙无牙和牙痛自述为指标。社会支持以婚姻状况和7项感知社会支持量表来表示。拟合混杂因素调整回归模型,以评估社会支持和口腔健康测量中的种族不平等(社会支持调整前后)。结果:总体而言,10.4%的人无牙,21.7%的有牙者在过去6个月内出现过牙痛。印度人(奇数比:0.50,95%置信区间:0.32-0.78)、巴基斯坦人(0.50,95%置信区间:0.30-0.84)、孟加拉国人(0.29,95%置信区间:0.17-0.47)和中国人(0.42,95%置信区间:0.25-0.71)患无牙症的可能性低于英国白人。在有牙齿的参与者中,爱尔兰人(1.21,95%CI: 1.06-1.38)和加勒比黑人(1.37,95%CI: 1.18-1.58)更有可能出现牙痛,而中国人(0.78,95%CI: 0.63-0.97)比英国白人更不可能出现牙痛。在调整婚姻状况和感知到的社会支持后,这些不平等略有减弱。缺乏社会支持与无牙和牙痛有关,而婚姻状况仅与无牙有关。结论:本研究结果不支持社会支持在种族与口腔健康之间的中介作用。然而,感知到缺乏社会支持与较差的口腔健康呈负相关,独立于参与者的社会人口因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Community dental health
Community dental health 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
75
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is concerned with dental public health and related subjects. Dental public health is the science and the art of preventing oral disease, promoting oral health, and improving the quality of life through the organised efforts of society. The discipline covers a wide range and includes such topics as: -oral epidemiology- oral health services research- preventive dentistry - especially in relation to communities- oral health education and promotion- clinical research - with particular emphasis on the care of special groups- behavioural sciences related to dentistry- decision theory- quality of life- risk analysis- ethics and oral health economics- quality assessment. The journal publishes scientific articles on the relevant fields, review articles, discussion papers, news items, and editorials. It is of interest to dentists working in dental public health and to other professionals concerned with disease prevention, health service planning, and health promotion throughout the world. In the case of epidemiology of oral diseases the Journal prioritises national studies unless local studies have major methodological innovations or information of particular interest.
期刊最新文献
Food insecurity and periodontitis in US adults. Demographic factors associated with oral health behaviour in children aged 5-17 years in Algeria. Integrating health screening for non-communicable diseases into dental services: what do we know? Dentin hypersensitivity and quality of life in patients with chronic systemic disease. Unmet Dental Care Needs of The Low-Income Elderly in South Korea: Applying the Andersen behavioural model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1