Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: review, case report and analysis of COVID-19-related cases.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Minerva cardiology and angiology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-27 DOI:10.23736/S2724-5683.22.06195-6
Joseph Cosma, Alessandro Russo, Valentina Ferradini, Cecilia Gobbi, Vincenzo Mallia, Andrea Zuffi, Cédric Joret, Salvatore Sacca, Ruggiero Mango
{"title":"Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: review, case report and analysis of COVID-19-related cases.","authors":"Joseph Cosma, Alessandro Russo, Valentina Ferradini, Cecilia Gobbi, Vincenzo Mallia, Andrea Zuffi, Cédric Joret, Salvatore Sacca, Ruggiero Mango","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5683.22.06195-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) accounts for 1-4% of all acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Since the first description in 1931, our understanding of the disease has evolved; however, its pathophysiology and management are still a matter of debate. SCAD typically occurs in a middle-aged woman with no or few traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Two hypotheses have been proposed to explain the pathophysiology depending on the primary event: an intimal tear in the \"inside-out\" hypothesis and a spontaneous hemorrhage from the vasa vasorum in the \"outside-in\" hypothesis. Etiology appears to be multifactorial: different predisposing and precipitating factors have been identified. Coronary angiography is the gold standard for the diagnosis of SCAD. Current recommendations on the treatment of SCAD patients are based on expert opinions: a conservative strategy is preferred in hemodynamically stable SCAD patients, while urgent revascularization should be considered in hemodynamically unstable patients. Eleven cases of SCAD in COVID-19 patients have already been described: although the exact pathophysiological mechanism remains unclear, COVID-19-related SCAD is considered a combination of significant systemic inflammatory response and localized vascular inflammation. We present a literature review of SCAD, and we report an unpublished case of SCAD in a COVID-19 patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":18668,"journal":{"name":"Minerva cardiology and angiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva cardiology and angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5683.22.06195-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) accounts for 1-4% of all acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Since the first description in 1931, our understanding of the disease has evolved; however, its pathophysiology and management are still a matter of debate. SCAD typically occurs in a middle-aged woman with no or few traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Two hypotheses have been proposed to explain the pathophysiology depending on the primary event: an intimal tear in the "inside-out" hypothesis and a spontaneous hemorrhage from the vasa vasorum in the "outside-in" hypothesis. Etiology appears to be multifactorial: different predisposing and precipitating factors have been identified. Coronary angiography is the gold standard for the diagnosis of SCAD. Current recommendations on the treatment of SCAD patients are based on expert opinions: a conservative strategy is preferred in hemodynamically stable SCAD patients, while urgent revascularization should be considered in hemodynamically unstable patients. Eleven cases of SCAD in COVID-19 patients have already been described: although the exact pathophysiological mechanism remains unclear, COVID-19-related SCAD is considered a combination of significant systemic inflammatory response and localized vascular inflammation. We present a literature review of SCAD, and we report an unpublished case of SCAD in a COVID-19 patient.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自发性冠状动脉夹层:COVID-19 相关病例的回顾、病例报告和分析。
自发性冠状动脉夹层(SCAD)占所有急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的 1-4%。自 1931 年首次描述以来,我们对该疾病的认识不断发展,但其病理生理学和治疗方法仍存在争议。SCAD 通常发生在没有或很少有传统心血管风险因素的中年女性身上。根据原发事件的不同,有两种假说可解释其病理生理学:"由内而外 "假说中的内膜撕裂和 "由外而内 "假说中的血管腔自发性出血。病因似乎是多因素的:已发现不同的易感因素和诱发因素。冠状动脉造影是诊断 SCAD 的金标准。目前对 SCAD 患者的治疗建议是基于专家的意见:对血流动力学稳定的 SCAD 患者首选保守治疗策略,而对血流动力学不稳定的患者则应考虑紧急血管重建。目前已描述了 11 例 COVID-19 患者的 SCAD:尽管确切的病理生理学机制仍不清楚,但 COVID-19 相关 SCAD 被认为是显著的全身炎症反应和局部血管炎症的结合。我们对 SCAD 进行了文献综述,并报告了一例未发表的 COVID-19 患者 SCAD 病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva cardiology and angiology
Minerva cardiology and angiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
118
期刊最新文献
Acurate neo2 is associated with a reduced inflammatory response in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Association between instantaneous heart rate sequence during the awake period and cardiovascular events: a study based on Sleep Heart Health Study. Cardiology 2.0: the (r)age of the machines? Clinical implications of Sokolow-Lyon voltage less than 3.5 mV in patients who have undergone transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Do publications of machine learning models justify the enthusiasm they generate?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1