Comparison of clinical characteristics and prognostic factors in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with and without renal dysfunction.
{"title":"Comparison of clinical characteristics and prognostic factors in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with and without renal dysfunction.","authors":"Kenichi Matsushita, Kazumasa Harada, Takashi Kohno, Hiroki Nakano, Daisuke Kitano, Junya Matsuda, Hideaki Yoshino, Takeshi Yamamoto, Ken Nagao, Morimasa Takayama","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06510-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with renal dysfunction (RD) is considered to be a specific phenotype of HFpEF. This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors for in-hospital mortality between HFpEF-diagnosed patients with and without RD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study included 5867 consecutive patients with acute HFpEF. RD was defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <60 mL/min per 1.73 m<sup>2</sup>. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests were used to compare the in-hospital mortality between the groups. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify significant prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the study cohort, 68% of patients had RD. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in HFpEF patients with RD than in those without RD. The comorbidities and laboratory data differed significantly between the groups. Independent prognostic factors for in-hospital mortality in the HFpEF patients with RD were age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.039), systolic blood pressure (HR, 0.991), eGFR (HR, 0.981), C-reactive protein (CRP; HR, 1.028), diuretics (HR, 0.374), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACE-I/ARBs; HR, 0.680), and beta-blockers (HR, 0.662). In HFpEF patients without RD, age (HR, 1.039), systolic blood pressure (HR, 0.979), and ACE-I/ARBs (HR, 0.373) were independent prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant differences in the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors, such as CRP and beta-blockers, were observed between the HFpEF patients with and without RD. These results have implications for future research and may help guide individualized patient management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":18668,"journal":{"name":"Minerva cardiology and angiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva cardiology and angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06510-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with renal dysfunction (RD) is considered to be a specific phenotype of HFpEF. This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors for in-hospital mortality between HFpEF-diagnosed patients with and without RD.
Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 5867 consecutive patients with acute HFpEF. RD was defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests were used to compare the in-hospital mortality between the groups. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify significant prognostic factors.
Results: Across the study cohort, 68% of patients had RD. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in HFpEF patients with RD than in those without RD. The comorbidities and laboratory data differed significantly between the groups. Independent prognostic factors for in-hospital mortality in the HFpEF patients with RD were age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.039), systolic blood pressure (HR, 0.991), eGFR (HR, 0.981), C-reactive protein (CRP; HR, 1.028), diuretics (HR, 0.374), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACE-I/ARBs; HR, 0.680), and beta-blockers (HR, 0.662). In HFpEF patients without RD, age (HR, 1.039), systolic blood pressure (HR, 0.979), and ACE-I/ARBs (HR, 0.373) were independent prognostic factors.
Conclusions: Significant differences in the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors, such as CRP and beta-blockers, were observed between the HFpEF patients with and without RD. These results have implications for future research and may help guide individualized patient management strategies.