Han-Yang Lin , Miao Sun , Ya-Jun Hao , Daijiang Li , Matthew A. Gitzendanner , Cheng-Xin Fu , Douglas E. Soltis , Pamela S. Soltis , Yun-Peng Zhao
{"title":"Phylogenetic diversity of eastern Asia–eastern North America disjunct plants is mainly associated with divergence time","authors":"Han-Yang Lin , Miao Sun , Ya-Jun Hao , Daijiang Li , Matthew A. Gitzendanner , Cheng-Xin Fu , Douglas E. Soltis , Pamela S. Soltis , Yun-Peng Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.pld.2022.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The underlying causes of biodiversity disparities among geographic regions have long been a fundamental theme in ecology and evolution. However, the patterns of phylogenetic diversity (PD) and phylogenetic beta diversity (PBD) of congeners that are disjunctly distributed between eastern Asia–eastern North America (EA−ENA disjuncts) and their associated factors remain unknown. Here we investigated the standardized effect size of PD (SES-PD), PBD, and potentially associated factors in 11 natural mixed forest sites (five in EA and six in ENA) where abundant EA−ENA disjuncts occur. We found that the disjuncts in ENA possessed higher SES-PD than those in EA at the continental scale (1.96 <em>vs</em> −1.12), even though the number of disjunct species in ENA is much lower than in EA (128 <em>vs</em> 263). SES-PD of the EA−ENA disjuncts tended to decrease with increasing latitude in 11 sites. The latitudinal diversity gradient of SES-PD was stronger in EA sites than in ENA sites. Based on the unweighted unique fraction metric (UniFrac) distance and the phylogenetic community dissimilarity, PBD showed that the two northern sites in EA were more similar to the six-site ENA group than to the remaining southern EA sites. Based on the standardized effect size of mean pairwise distances (SES-MPD), nine of eleven studied sites showed a neutral community structure (−1.96 ≤ SES-MPD ≤ 1.96). Both Pearson's <em>r</em> and structural equation modeling suggested that SES-PD of the EA–ENA disjuncts was mostly associated with mean divergence time. Moreover, SES-PD of the EA–ENA disjuncts was positively correlated with temperature-related climatic factors, although negatively correlated with mean diversification rate and community structure. By applying approaches from phylogenetics and community ecology, our work sheds light on historical patterns of the EA−ENA disjunction and paves the way for further research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20224,"journal":{"name":"Plant Diversity","volume":"45 1","pages":"Pages 27-35"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/83/89/main.PMC9975473.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Diversity","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468265922001019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The underlying causes of biodiversity disparities among geographic regions have long been a fundamental theme in ecology and evolution. However, the patterns of phylogenetic diversity (PD) and phylogenetic beta diversity (PBD) of congeners that are disjunctly distributed between eastern Asia–eastern North America (EA−ENA disjuncts) and their associated factors remain unknown. Here we investigated the standardized effect size of PD (SES-PD), PBD, and potentially associated factors in 11 natural mixed forest sites (five in EA and six in ENA) where abundant EA−ENA disjuncts occur. We found that the disjuncts in ENA possessed higher SES-PD than those in EA at the continental scale (1.96 vs −1.12), even though the number of disjunct species in ENA is much lower than in EA (128 vs 263). SES-PD of the EA−ENA disjuncts tended to decrease with increasing latitude in 11 sites. The latitudinal diversity gradient of SES-PD was stronger in EA sites than in ENA sites. Based on the unweighted unique fraction metric (UniFrac) distance and the phylogenetic community dissimilarity, PBD showed that the two northern sites in EA were more similar to the six-site ENA group than to the remaining southern EA sites. Based on the standardized effect size of mean pairwise distances (SES-MPD), nine of eleven studied sites showed a neutral community structure (−1.96 ≤ SES-MPD ≤ 1.96). Both Pearson's r and structural equation modeling suggested that SES-PD of the EA–ENA disjuncts was mostly associated with mean divergence time. Moreover, SES-PD of the EA–ENA disjuncts was positively correlated with temperature-related climatic factors, although negatively correlated with mean diversification rate and community structure. By applying approaches from phylogenetics and community ecology, our work sheds light on historical patterns of the EA−ENA disjunction and paves the way for further research.
地理区域之间生物多样性差异的根本原因长期以来一直是生态学和进化论的一个基本主题。然而,在东亚-北美东部之间间断分布的同源物的系统发育多样性(PD)和系统发育β多样性(PBD)模式(EA−ENA间断)及其相关因素仍然未知。在这里,我们研究了11个天然混合林站点(5个在EA,6个在ENA)中PD(SES-PD)、PBD和潜在相关因素的标准化效应大小,其中发生了大量的EA−ENA间断。我们发现,在大陆范围内,ENA中的间断物种具有比EA更高的SES-PD(1.96 vs−1.12),尽管ENA中间断物种的数量远低于EA(128 vs 263)。在11个位点,EA−ENA间断的SES-PD倾向于随着纬度的增加而减少。SES-PD在EA位点的纬度多样性梯度强于ENA位点。基于未加权唯一分数度量(UniFrac)距离和系统发育群落相异性,PBD表明EA中的两个北部位点与六个位点的ENA组相比,与其余的南部位点更相似。基于平均成对距离的标准化效应大小(SES-MPD),11个研究位点中有9个表现出中性群落结构(−1.96≤SES-MPD≤1.96)。Pearson的r和结构方程建模都表明,EA–ENA析取的SES-PD主要与平均散度时间有关。此外,EA-ENA间断的SES-PD与温度相关的气候因素呈正相关,但与平均多样化率和群落结构呈负相关。通过应用系统发育学和群落生态学的方法,我们的工作揭示了EA-ENA分离的历史模式,并为进一步的研究铺平了道路。
Plant DiversityAgricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1863
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍:
Plant Diversity (formerly Plant Diversity and Resources) is an international plant science journal that publishes substantial original research and review papers that
advance our understanding of the past and current distribution of plants,
contribute to the development of more phylogenetically accurate taxonomic classifications,
present new findings on or insights into evolutionary processes and mechanisms that are of interest to the community of plant systematic and evolutionary biologists.
While the focus of the journal is on biodiversity, ecology and evolution of East Asian flora, it is not limited to these topics. Applied evolutionary issues, such as climate change and conservation biology, are welcome, especially if they address conceptual problems. Theoretical papers are equally welcome. Preference is given to concise, clearly written papers focusing on precisely framed questions or hypotheses. Papers that are purely descriptive have a low chance of acceptance.
Fields covered by the journal include:
plant systematics and taxonomy-
evolutionary developmental biology-
reproductive biology-
phylo- and biogeography-
evolutionary ecology-
population biology-
conservation biology-
palaeobotany-
molecular evolution-
comparative and evolutionary genomics-
physiology-
biochemistry