[Survey on the use of antibiotics among Swiss equine veterinarians].

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.17236/sat00384
T Kunz, P R Torgerson, A Schoster
{"title":"[Survey on the use of antibiotics among Swiss equine veterinarians].","authors":"T Kunz,&nbsp;P R Torgerson,&nbsp;A Schoster","doi":"10.17236/sat00384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the current use of antibiotics by Swiss equine veterinarians and to compare the results with a similar study from 2013 before the introduction of the web tool Antibiotic Scout. The survey was sent to equine veterinarians according to the member database of the Swiss Veterinary Association (GST, SVS). The demographic data of the respondents and their antibiotics usage were collected. In addition, six different case scenarios were presented with questions to their potential antibiotic usage, active substance/preparation and the dosing scheme. The dosage provided was compared with the dosage information approved by Swissmedic in the information for healthcare professionals and the recommendations of the antibiotic scout. A backward logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between different aspects of antibiotic use and demographic data. The response rate was 94/739 (13 %), 22 of the 94 (23 %) had also participated in the 2013 study. 47/94 (50 %) of the respondents obtained their information from the antibiotic scout. The respondents indicated that they used an antibiotic in 16 %-88 % depending on the case scenario. Neither 3rd nor 4th generation cephalosporins or fluoroquinolones were used in the case scenarios. Dihydrostreptomycin was indicated as a possible antibiotic in a case scenario by 14/94 (15 %) of the respondents. Respondents who had already taken part in the 2013 survey used dihydrostreptomycin significantly more frequently (7/22, 32 % vs. 7/72, 10 %; p = 0,047). 29/81 (36 %) had underdosed compared to the prescribing information and 38/81 (47 %) compared to the antibiotic scout; neither was associated with demographic data. The use of non-equine-licensed antimicrobial products was directly related to the number of veterinarians in the practice (p = 0,007) and to the percentage of horses (p = 0,02). No association between demographics and peri-operative antibiotic use >24h (17/44, 39 %) was detected. The antibiotic prescribing habits of Swiss equine veterinarians have improved over the last 10 years. The antibiotic use decreased compared to the study of Schwechler et al. in 2013 by 0-16 % depending on the case scenario. The use of 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins was reduced by 4 % and fluoroquinolones by 7 %. Underdosing according to scientific recommendations was reduced by 32 %. Furthermore, there is a need for additional information regarding the indication for antimicrobial use and the adequate use of perioperative antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":21544,"journal":{"name":"Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde","volume":"165 2","pages":"105-0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17236/sat00384","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the current use of antibiotics by Swiss equine veterinarians and to compare the results with a similar study from 2013 before the introduction of the web tool Antibiotic Scout. The survey was sent to equine veterinarians according to the member database of the Swiss Veterinary Association (GST, SVS). The demographic data of the respondents and their antibiotics usage were collected. In addition, six different case scenarios were presented with questions to their potential antibiotic usage, active substance/preparation and the dosing scheme. The dosage provided was compared with the dosage information approved by Swissmedic in the information for healthcare professionals and the recommendations of the antibiotic scout. A backward logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between different aspects of antibiotic use and demographic data. The response rate was 94/739 (13 %), 22 of the 94 (23 %) had also participated in the 2013 study. 47/94 (50 %) of the respondents obtained their information from the antibiotic scout. The respondents indicated that they used an antibiotic in 16 %-88 % depending on the case scenario. Neither 3rd nor 4th generation cephalosporins or fluoroquinolones were used in the case scenarios. Dihydrostreptomycin was indicated as a possible antibiotic in a case scenario by 14/94 (15 %) of the respondents. Respondents who had already taken part in the 2013 survey used dihydrostreptomycin significantly more frequently (7/22, 32 % vs. 7/72, 10 %; p = 0,047). 29/81 (36 %) had underdosed compared to the prescribing information and 38/81 (47 %) compared to the antibiotic scout; neither was associated with demographic data. The use of non-equine-licensed antimicrobial products was directly related to the number of veterinarians in the practice (p = 0,007) and to the percentage of horses (p = 0,02). No association between demographics and peri-operative antibiotic use >24h (17/44, 39 %) was detected. The antibiotic prescribing habits of Swiss equine veterinarians have improved over the last 10 years. The antibiotic use decreased compared to the study of Schwechler et al. in 2013 by 0-16 % depending on the case scenario. The use of 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins was reduced by 4 % and fluoroquinolones by 7 %. Underdosing according to scientific recommendations was reduced by 32 %. Furthermore, there is a need for additional information regarding the indication for antimicrobial use and the adequate use of perioperative antibiotics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞士马类兽医抗生素使用情况调查
简介:本研究的目的是评估瑞士马兽医目前使用抗生素的情况,并将结果与2013年引入网络工具抗生素侦察员之前的类似研究进行比较。根据瑞士兽医协会(GST, SVS)的成员数据库,该调查被发送给马兽医。收集调查对象的人口统计资料及抗生素使用情况。此外,提出了六种不同的病例方案,并对其潜在的抗生素使用、活性物质/制剂和给药方案提出了问题。将所提供的剂量与瑞士医学委员会在医疗保健专业人员信息和抗生素侦察员建议中批准的剂量信息进行比较。进行了反向逻辑回归分析,以评估抗生素使用不同方面与人口统计数据之间的关系。应答率为94/739(13%),其中22例(23%)也参加了2013年的研究。47/94(50%)答复者从抗生素侦察员处获得信息。答复者表示,根据具体情况,他们使用抗生素的比例为16% - 88%。病例中未使用第三代和第四代头孢菌素或氟喹诺酮类药物。14/94(15%)的答复者指出,双氢链霉素是一种可能的抗生素。已经参加2013年调查的受访者使用双氢链霉素的频率明显更高(7/ 22,32比7/ 72,10;P = 0.047)。与处方信息相比,29/81(36%)的患者剂量不足,38/81(47%)的患者剂量不足;两者都与人口统计数据无关。非马许可抗菌产品的使用与实践中兽医的数量(p = 0,007)和马的百分比(p = 0,02)直接相关。人口统计学与围手术期抗生素使用>24h之间无关联(17/44,39%)。在过去的10年里,瑞士兽医给马开抗生素处方的习惯有所改善。与2013年Schwechler等人的研究相比,抗生素的使用减少了0- 16%,具体取决于病例情况。第三代和第四代头孢菌素的使用减少了4%,氟喹诺酮类药物的使用减少了7%。根据科学建议,剂量不足减少了32%。此外,还需要关于抗菌素使用的适应症和围手术期抗生素的充分使用的额外信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde
Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
46
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Das Schweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde ist die älteste veterinärmedizinische Zeitschrift der Welt (gegründet 1816). Es ist das wissenschaftliche und praxisbezogene offizielle Publikationsorgan der Gesellschaft Schweizer Tierärztinnen und Tierärzte.
期刊最新文献
[Retrospective study of the effectiveness of human tyrosinase vaccination in eight horses]. Diagnosis and management of a more advanced stage of preclinical myxomatous mitral valve disease in dogs without echocardiography. Management, health, and veterinary care of donkeys in Switzerland: A cross-sectional study. [Stress profile of veterinarians in Switzerland: Young + female + employed = stressed?] Age-dependent haemogram and sex-dependent serum biochemistry values in semi-feral Konik horses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1