Cross-cultural adaptation, and factor structure of the decision styles scale for Brazil

G.S. Mouta , A.L.C.B. Pinto , L.F. Malloy-Diniz , R.S. Pasian
{"title":"Cross-cultural adaptation, and factor structure of the decision styles scale for Brazil","authors":"G.S. Mouta ,&nbsp;A.L.C.B. Pinto ,&nbsp;L.F. Malloy-Diniz ,&nbsp;R.S. Pasian","doi":"10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective was to carry out the cross-cultural adaptation of the Decision Styles Scale (DSS) for Brazil. Translation and back-translation were carried out, evaluated by a committee of experts. DSS was answered by 1218 participants of both sexes (women = 816, 73.4%) aged between 18 and 64 (M = 26.68; SD = 8.32). A Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analysis was performed, and items were analyzed by the Gradual Response Model of the Item Response Theory. Results indicated that the structure of two styles (rational and intuitive) shows excellent goodness-of-fit, showing high reliability and invariance of psychometric parameters as a function of gender. IRT indicated that items in the rational style require fewer latent traits than those in the intuitive style. These results indicated that DSS presents validity for assessing decision styles in the Brazilian context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72746,"journal":{"name":"Current research in behavioral sciences","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100039"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100039","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in behavioral sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666518221000267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The objective was to carry out the cross-cultural adaptation of the Decision Styles Scale (DSS) for Brazil. Translation and back-translation were carried out, evaluated by a committee of experts. DSS was answered by 1218 participants of both sexes (women = 816, 73.4%) aged between 18 and 64 (M = 26.68; SD = 8.32). A Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analysis was performed, and items were analyzed by the Gradual Response Model of the Item Response Theory. Results indicated that the structure of two styles (rational and intuitive) shows excellent goodness-of-fit, showing high reliability and invariance of psychometric parameters as a function of gender. IRT indicated that items in the rational style require fewer latent traits than those in the intuitive style. These results indicated that DSS presents validity for assessing decision styles in the Brazilian context.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西决策风格量表的跨文化适应及因素结构
目的是为巴西开展决策风格量表(DSS)的跨文化适应。进行了翻译和反翻译,由专家委员会进行了评估。1218名男女参与者(女性 = 816,73.4%)回答了DSS,年龄在18至64岁之间(男性 = 26.68;SD = 8.32)。采用多组验证性因子分析,采用项目反应理论的渐进反应模型对项目进行分析。结果表明,理性和直观两种风格的结构均表现出良好的拟合优度,心理测量参数在性别上具有较高的信度和不变性。IRT结果表明,理性风格的项目比直觉风格的项目需要更少的潜在特征。这些结果表明,决策支持量表在巴西背景下评估决策风格是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current research in behavioral sciences
Current research in behavioral sciences Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents The causal role of numerical and non-numerical order processing abilities in the early development of mathematics skills: Evidence from an intervention study Discrete memories of a continuous world: A working memory perspective on event segmentation Relationships between physical activity and loneliness: A systematic review of intervention studies Do narcissists possess a sense of purpose? Purpose-in-life and narcissism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1