Social stigma against individuals with COVID-19: scale development and validation.

IF 2.4 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21642850.2022.2155166
Angga Wilandika, Nina Gartika, Salami Salami
{"title":"Social stigma against individuals with COVID-19: scale development and validation.","authors":"Angga Wilandika,&nbsp;Nina Gartika,&nbsp;Salami Salami","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2022.2155166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social stigma toward individuals with COVID-19 is a public phenomenon that significantly impacts the prevention of this disease. The study aimed to develop and examine the scale of social stigma against people with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted from June to August 2021 using random sampling. Two hundred twenty-five people were involved in the study. All people are domiciled in Bandung Regency, West Java, Indonesia and have never been infected with COVID-19. The scale was designed based on the dimensional structure of social stigma and then evaluated the scale's psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The study found that instruments with 12 items had a content validity index of 1.0. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.875 showed as satisfactory. Exploratory factor analysis was performed on the first sample (n = 100), and four factors were extracted from the exploratory factor analysis: ignorance/labelling, stereotype, separation, and discrimination. Following this, the confirmatory factor analysis in the remaining sample (n = 120) showed a good fit between the four-factor model and the theoretical model of social stigma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The social stigma scale has been determined to be valid and reliable. Health practitioners can use this scale to predict social stigma toward individuals with COVID-19 to develop better transmission prevention strategies and improved quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9809341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2155166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social stigma toward individuals with COVID-19 is a public phenomenon that significantly impacts the prevention of this disease. The study aimed to develop and examine the scale of social stigma against people with COVID-19.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from June to August 2021 using random sampling. Two hundred twenty-five people were involved in the study. All people are domiciled in Bandung Regency, West Java, Indonesia and have never been infected with COVID-19. The scale was designed based on the dimensional structure of social stigma and then evaluated the scale's psychometric properties.

Result: The study found that instruments with 12 items had a content validity index of 1.0. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.875 showed as satisfactory. Exploratory factor analysis was performed on the first sample (n = 100), and four factors were extracted from the exploratory factor analysis: ignorance/labelling, stereotype, separation, and discrimination. Following this, the confirmatory factor analysis in the remaining sample (n = 120) showed a good fit between the four-factor model and the theoretical model of social stigma.

Conclusions: The social stigma scale has been determined to be valid and reliable. Health practitioners can use this scale to predict social stigma toward individuals with COVID-19 to develop better transmission prevention strategies and improved quality of care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对COVID-19患者的社会歧视:规模发展和验证。
背景:对COVID-19患者的社会污名是一种公共现象,对该疾病的预防有重大影响。该研究旨在开发和研究对COVID-19患者的社会耻辱程度。方法:于2021年6月至8月采用随机抽样方法进行横断面研究。225人参与了这项研究。所有人都居住在印度尼西亚西爪哇省万隆县,从未感染过COVID-19。根据社会污名的维度结构设计量表,并对量表的心理测量特性进行评估。结果:研究发现12个项目的量表的内容效度指数为1.0。Cronbach的α系数为0.875,为满意。对第一个样本(n = 100)进行探索性因素分析,从探索性因素分析中提取4个因素:无知/标签、刻板印象、分离和歧视。随后,对剩余样本(n = 120)的验证性因子分析表明,四因素模型与社会污名的理论模型拟合良好。结论:社会耻感量表具有一定的效度和可靠性。卫生从业人员可以利用这一量表预测对COVID-19患者的社会耻辱感,以制定更好的传播预防策略并提高护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
57
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine: an Open Access Journal (HPBM) publishes theoretical and empirical contributions on all aspects of research and practice into psychosocial, behavioral and biomedical aspects of health. HPBM publishes international, interdisciplinary research with diverse methodological approaches on: Assessment and diagnosis Narratives, experiences and discourses of health and illness Treatment processes and recovery Health cognitions and behaviors at population and individual levels Psychosocial an behavioral prevention interventions Psychosocial determinants and consequences of behavior Social and cultural contexts of health and illness, health disparities Health, illness and medicine Application of advanced information and communication technology.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive emotional regulation in physiotherapy students in Croatia. Look, over there! A streaker! - Qualitative study examining streaking as a behaviour change technique for habit formation in recreational runners. Factors influencing health-related quality of life of children with overweight and obesity in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Navigating post-ICU care: understanding family members' experiences - a qualitative study. Supporting General Practitioners and people with hypertension to maximise medication use to control blood pressure: the contribution of Collective Intelligence to the development of the 'Maximising Adherence, Minimising Inertia' (MIAMI) intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1