Pre-Sleep Cognitive Arousal Is Negatively Associated with Sleep Misperception in Healthy Sleepers during Habitual Environmental Noise Exposure: An Actigraphy Study.

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clocks & Sleep Pub Date : 2022-02-24 DOI:10.3390/clockssleep4010010
Rachel L Sharman, Michael L Perlis, Célyne H Bastien, Nicola L Barclay, Jason G Ellis, Greg J Elder
{"title":"Pre-Sleep Cognitive Arousal Is Negatively Associated with Sleep Misperception in Healthy Sleepers during Habitual Environmental Noise Exposure: An Actigraphy Study.","authors":"Rachel L Sharman,&nbsp;Michael L Perlis,&nbsp;Célyne H Bastien,&nbsp;Nicola L Barclay,&nbsp;Jason G Ellis,&nbsp;Greg J Elder","doi":"10.3390/clockssleep4010010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Specific noises (e.g., traffic or wind turbines) can disrupt sleep and potentially cause a mismatch between subjective sleep and objective sleep (i.e., “sleep misperception”). Some individuals are likely to be more vulnerable than others to noise-related sleep disturbances, potentially as a result of increased pre-sleep cognitive arousal. The aim of the present study was to examine the relationships between pre-sleep cognitive arousal and sleep misperception. Sixteen healthy sleepers participated in this naturalistic, observational study. Three nights of sleep were measured using actigraphy, and each 15-s epoch was classified as sleep or wake. Bedside noise was recorded, and each 15-s segment was classified as containing noise or no noise and matched to actigraphy. Participants completed measures of habitual pre-sleep cognitive and somatic arousal and noise sensitivity. Pre-sleep cognitive and somatic arousal levels were negatively associated with subjective−objective total sleep time discrepancy (p < 0.01). There was an association between sleep/wake and noise presence/absence in the first and last 90 min of sleep (p < 0.001). These results indicate that higher levels of habitual pre-sleep arousal are associated with a greater degree of sleep misperception, and even in healthy sleepers, objective sleep is vulnerable to habitual bedside noise.</p>","PeriodicalId":33568,"journal":{"name":"Clocks & Sleep","volume":"4 1","pages":"88-99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8947652/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clocks & Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep4010010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Specific noises (e.g., traffic or wind turbines) can disrupt sleep and potentially cause a mismatch between subjective sleep and objective sleep (i.e., “sleep misperception”). Some individuals are likely to be more vulnerable than others to noise-related sleep disturbances, potentially as a result of increased pre-sleep cognitive arousal. The aim of the present study was to examine the relationships between pre-sleep cognitive arousal and sleep misperception. Sixteen healthy sleepers participated in this naturalistic, observational study. Three nights of sleep were measured using actigraphy, and each 15-s epoch was classified as sleep or wake. Bedside noise was recorded, and each 15-s segment was classified as containing noise or no noise and matched to actigraphy. Participants completed measures of habitual pre-sleep cognitive and somatic arousal and noise sensitivity. Pre-sleep cognitive and somatic arousal levels were negatively associated with subjective−objective total sleep time discrepancy (p < 0.01). There was an association between sleep/wake and noise presence/absence in the first and last 90 min of sleep (p < 0.001). These results indicate that higher levels of habitual pre-sleep arousal are associated with a greater degree of sleep misperception, and even in healthy sleepers, objective sleep is vulnerable to habitual bedside noise.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康睡眠者在习惯性环境噪声暴露时,睡眠前认知觉醒与睡眠错觉负相关:一项活动图研究。
特定的噪音(例如,交通或风力涡轮机)会扰乱睡眠,并可能导致主观睡眠和客观睡眠之间的不匹配(即“睡眠错觉”)。有些人可能比其他人更容易受到与噪音有关的睡眠障碍的影响,这可能是由于睡眠前认知觉醒增加的结果。本研究的目的是研究睡眠前认知觉醒和睡眠错觉之间的关系。16名健康的睡眠者参加了这项自然的观察性研究。使用活动记录仪测量三个晚上的睡眠,每个15-s epoch被划分为睡眠或清醒。记录床边噪声,每15-s段按含噪声和无噪声进行分类,并与活动记录仪相匹配。参与者完成了习惯性睡前认知和躯体唤醒以及噪音敏感性的测量。睡眠前认知和躯体唤醒水平与主客观总睡眠时间差异呈负相关(p < 0.01)。在睡眠的前90分钟和最后90分钟,睡眠/清醒与噪音存在/不存在之间存在关联(p < 0.001)。这些结果表明,高水平的习惯性睡前唤醒与更大程度的睡眠误解有关,即使在健康的睡眠者中,客观睡眠也容易受到习惯性床边噪音的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clocks & Sleep
Clocks & Sleep Multiple-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia on Self-Reported Sleep Parameters: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Designing Infant Mattresses Tailored to Developmental Sleep Characteristics: A Comprehensive Review. Anticipation of Stress and Relaxation Dynamically Impacts Sleep. Estimation of the Circadian Phase Difference in Weekend Sleep and Further Evidence for Our Failure to Sleep More on Weekends to Catch Up on Lost Sleep. Sleep as a Developmental Process: A Systematic Review of Cognitive, Emotional, and Behavioral Outcomes in Children Aged 6-12 Years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1