Are early-onset spasms predictive of poor neurological recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury?

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-09 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2022.2150068
Antoine Dionne, Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong, Mohammad A Alsofyani, Andréane Richard-Denis
{"title":"Are early-onset spasms predictive of poor neurological recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury?","authors":"Antoine Dionne, Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong, Mohammad A Alsofyani, Andréane Richard-Denis","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2022.2150068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Following spinal cord injury (SCI), early spasms are associated with decreased functional recovery. It has also been hypothesized that early spasticity might sign underlying maladaptive neuroplasticity, which could translate in worse neurological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this context, this paper aims to evaluate if early-onset spasms are also associated with neurological outcomes after SCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 196 cases from a prospective SCI database was conducted. The presence of early spasms during the acute hospitalization was assessed by a single physiatrist. The characteristics and long-term neurological outcomes of individuals with and without early spasms were first compared. Multivariate regression analyses were then performed to determine the relationship between early spasms and neurological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>30.1% (<i>N</i> = 59) of patients presented early spasms. These patients had several distinguishing characteristics including higher odds of tetraplegia (vs. paraplegia) and more severe injuries. At the bivariate level, patients with early spasms had higher odds of improving at least 1 AIS grade between baseline and follow-up. However, this was not significant at the multivariate level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early spasms are not significantly associated with poorer neurological outcomes, contrasting with the unwritten consensus that early spasticity translates maladaptive neuroplasticity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"566-572"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11218569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2022.2150068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Following spinal cord injury (SCI), early spasms are associated with decreased functional recovery. It has also been hypothesized that early spasticity might sign underlying maladaptive neuroplasticity, which could translate in worse neurological outcomes.

Objective: In this context, this paper aims to evaluate if early-onset spasms are also associated with neurological outcomes after SCI.

Methods: A retrospective review of 196 cases from a prospective SCI database was conducted. The presence of early spasms during the acute hospitalization was assessed by a single physiatrist. The characteristics and long-term neurological outcomes of individuals with and without early spasms were first compared. Multivariate regression analyses were then performed to determine the relationship between early spasms and neurological outcomes.

Results: 30.1% (N = 59) of patients presented early spasms. These patients had several distinguishing characteristics including higher odds of tetraplegia (vs. paraplegia) and more severe injuries. At the bivariate level, patients with early spasms had higher odds of improving at least 1 AIS grade between baseline and follow-up. However, this was not significant at the multivariate level.

Conclusions: Early spasms are not significantly associated with poorer neurological outcomes, contrasting with the unwritten consensus that early spasticity translates maladaptive neuroplasticity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早发痉挛是否预示着创伤性脊髓损伤后神经功能恢复不良?
背景:脊髓损伤(SCI)后,早期痉挛与功能恢复能力下降有关。还有人假设,早期痉挛可能是潜在的适应性神经可塑性不良的信号,这可能会导致神经系统预后变差:在此背景下,本文旨在评估早期痉挛是否也与 SCI 后的神经功能预后有关:方法:对前瞻性 SCI 数据库中的 196 个病例进行了回顾性研究。方法:对前瞻性 SCI 数据库中的 196 例病例进行了回顾性研究,由一名物理治疗师对急性住院期间是否出现早期痉挛进行评估。首先比较了有早期痉挛和无早期痉挛患者的特征和长期神经功能预后。然后进行多变量回归分析,以确定早期痉挛与神经系统预后之间的关系:30.1%(N = 59)的患者出现早期痉挛。结果:30.1%的患者(N = 59)出现了早期痉挛,这些患者有几个显著特点,包括四肢瘫痪(与截瘫相比)的几率更高,受伤程度更严重。在双变量水平上,早期痉挛患者在基线和随访期间至少提高一个 AIS 等级的几率更高。然而,这在多变量水平上并不显著:结论:早期痉挛与较差的神经系统预后并无明显关联,这与 "早期痉挛意味着适应性神经可塑性不良 "这一不成文的共识形成了鲜明对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
期刊最新文献
Embracing Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Access (IDEA): Cultivating understanding internally to foster external change. First report of a new exoskeleton in incomplete spinal cord injury: FreeGait®. Improving current understanding of cognitive impairment in patients with a spinal cord injury: A UK-based clinician survey. Shelter-in-place during the COVID-19 pandemic: Impact on secondary health conditions, anxiety, loneliness, social isolation, social connectedness, and positive affect and well-being. The association between locus of control and general mental health in patients with lumbar spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1