Shelter-in-place during the COVID-19 pandemic: Impact on secondary health conditions, anxiety, loneliness, social isolation, social connectedness, and positive affect and well-being.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2024.2420430
Melissa L Zahl, Jennifer A Piatt, Cedomir Stanojevic, Shu Cole, Harold D Green
{"title":"Shelter-in-place during the COVID-19 pandemic: Impact on secondary health conditions, anxiety, loneliness, social isolation, social connectedness, and positive affect and well-being.","authors":"Melissa L Zahl, Jennifer A Piatt, Cedomir Stanojevic, Shu Cole, Harold D Green","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2420430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context/objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to examine the implications of shelter-in-place (SIP) during the COVID-19 pandemic on secondary health conditions (SHC), loneliness, social isolation, social connectedness, anxiety, and positive affect and well-being (PAWB) among community-dwelling adults with spinal cord injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An online exploratory cross-sectional descriptive design.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>131 community-dwelling adults with SCI.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>UCLA Loneliness Scale, SCI-QOL - Anxiety and PAWB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents were approximately 33 years old, mostly male and Caucasian. More than half reported being married, living with their spouse in a home with modifications, or living in a household of three or more people. More than half reported experiencing more pain during SIP but not experiencing more of any other SHC than before SIP. On average, participants experienced a moderate level of loneliness, severe anxiety, and higher levels of PAWB during SIP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Respondents reported that they experienced more pain, loneliness, and anxiety while at the same time reporting higher PAWB. Future research should focus on understanding the nuances of the seemingly counterintuitive relationship described here to develop better ways to support community-dwelling adults with SCI during public health emergencies and SIP.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2420430","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context/objective: The objective of this study was to examine the implications of shelter-in-place (SIP) during the COVID-19 pandemic on secondary health conditions (SHC), loneliness, social isolation, social connectedness, anxiety, and positive affect and well-being (PAWB) among community-dwelling adults with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Design: An online exploratory cross-sectional descriptive design.

Participants: 131 community-dwelling adults with SCI.

Outcome measures: UCLA Loneliness Scale, SCI-QOL - Anxiety and PAWB.

Results: Respondents were approximately 33 years old, mostly male and Caucasian. More than half reported being married, living with their spouse in a home with modifications, or living in a household of three or more people. More than half reported experiencing more pain during SIP but not experiencing more of any other SHC than before SIP. On average, participants experienced a moderate level of loneliness, severe anxiety, and higher levels of PAWB during SIP.

Conclusion: Respondents reported that they experienced more pain, loneliness, and anxiety while at the same time reporting higher PAWB. Future research should focus on understanding the nuances of the seemingly counterintuitive relationship described here to develop better ways to support community-dwelling adults with SCI during public health emergencies and SIP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行期间的就地避难:对继发性健康状况、焦虑、孤独、社会隔离、社会联系以及积极情绪和幸福感的影响。
背景/目标:本研究旨在探讨在COVID-19大流行期间,就地避难(SIP)对居住在社区的脊髓损伤(SCI)成人的继发性健康状况(SHC)、孤独感、社会隔离、社会联系、焦虑以及积极情绪和幸福感(PAWB)的影响:设计:在线探索性横断面描述性设计:结果测量:结果测量:UCLA 孤独量表、SCI-QOL - 焦虑和 PAWB:受访者年龄约为 33 岁,大多为男性和白种人。半数以上的受访者表示自己已婚,与配偶居住在经过改装的家中,或居住在三人或三人以上的家庭中。半数以上的人表示,在 SIP 期间经历了更多的疼痛,但与 SIP 之前相比,没有经历更多的其他 SHC。平均而言,参与者在 SIP 期间体验到了中等程度的孤独感、严重的焦虑感和较高程度的 PAWB:受访者表示,他们经历了更多的痛苦、孤独和焦虑,同时 PAWB 也更高。未来的研究应侧重于了解本文所述的看似反直觉关系的细微差别,以开发出更好的方法,在公共卫生突发事件和 SIP 期间为居住在社区的成年 SCI 患者提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
期刊最新文献
Embracing Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Access (IDEA): Cultivating understanding internally to foster external change. First report of a new exoskeleton in incomplete spinal cord injury: FreeGait®. Improving current understanding of cognitive impairment in patients with a spinal cord injury: A UK-based clinician survey. Shelter-in-place during the COVID-19 pandemic: Impact on secondary health conditions, anxiety, loneliness, social isolation, social connectedness, and positive affect and well-being. The association between locus of control and general mental health in patients with lumbar spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1