Do We Underestimate Colorectal Cancer Patients Under 50?

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY Polish Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2022-05-02 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0015.8386
Sami Benli, Tahsin Colak, Mehmet Özgür Türkmenoğlu, Habip Sari, Caner Baysan
{"title":"Do We Underestimate Colorectal Cancer Patients Under 50?","authors":"Sami Benli,&nbsp;Tahsin Colak,&nbsp;Mehmet Özgür Türkmenoğlu,&nbsp;Habip Sari,&nbsp;Caner Baysan","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.8386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>&lt;b&gt; Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) accounts for approximately 10% of all colorectal cancers (CRCs). EOCRC has a certain hereditary predisposition and distinct clinicopathological and molecular features compared to the traditional average-onset of colorectal cancer (AOCRC). As previous publications have shown, EOCRC has a more advanced TNM stage and a more aggressive tumor histopathology. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt; Aim:&lt;/b&gt; In this study, we aimed to evaluate the differences and similarities of EOCRC compared to AOCRC based on clinicopathological characteristics. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Material and methods:&lt;/b&gt; Between January 2010 and December 2020, 394 patients with inclusion criteria who were operated on at the 3rd level health center for colorectal cancer were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups as EOCRC (50 years and under) and AOCRC. Pearson&apos;s chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables in independent groups. In addition, logistic regression analysis was performed using the Backward method with the variables whose relationship with the age group was evaluated, with P &lt; 0.100. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Our final analysis included 80 EOCRC cases and 314 controls. When the EOCRC group was compared with the AOCRC group, there was no statistically significant difference between gender, tumor location, T stage of the tumor, and survival (P = 0.190, P = 0.924, P = 0.165, P = 0.574). However, a statistically significant difference in the N stage, degree of differentiation, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) status, and P-values were: P = 0.006, P = 0.029, P = 0.019, and P = 0.003, respectively. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/b&gt; EOCRC has more aggressive tumor biology than AOCRC. Our study shows that more advanced N stage, poor differentiation, tumor deposits, LVI, and PNI are seen more frequently in EOCRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":43422,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Surgery","volume":"95 1","pages":"13-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.8386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

<b> Introduction:</b> Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) accounts for approximately 10% of all colorectal cancers (CRCs). EOCRC has a certain hereditary predisposition and distinct clinicopathological and molecular features compared to the traditional average-onset of colorectal cancer (AOCRC). As previous publications have shown, EOCRC has a more advanced TNM stage and a more aggressive tumor histopathology. </br></br> <b> Aim:</b> In this study, we aimed to evaluate the differences and similarities of EOCRC compared to AOCRC based on clinicopathological characteristics. </br></br> <b>Material and methods:</b> Between January 2010 and December 2020, 394 patients with inclusion criteria who were operated on at the 3rd level health center for colorectal cancer were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups as EOCRC (50 years and under) and AOCRC. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables in independent groups. In addition, logistic regression analysis was performed using the Backward method with the variables whose relationship with the age group was evaluated, with P < 0.100. </br></br> <b>Results:</b> Our final analysis included 80 EOCRC cases and 314 controls. When the EOCRC group was compared with the AOCRC group, there was no statistically significant difference between gender, tumor location, T stage of the tumor, and survival (P = 0.190, P = 0.924, P = 0.165, P = 0.574). However, a statistically significant difference in the N stage, degree of differentiation, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) status, and P-values were: P = 0.006, P = 0.029, P = 0.019, and P = 0.003, respectively. </br></br> <b>Conclusion:</b> EOCRC has more aggressive tumor biology than AOCRC. Our study shows that more advanced N stage, poor differentiation, tumor deposits, LVI, and PNI are seen more frequently in EOCRC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们是否低估了50岁以下的结直肠癌患者?
& lt; b>作品简介:& lt; / b>早发性结直肠癌(EOCRC)约占所有结直肠癌(crc)的10%。与传统的平均起病结直肠癌(AOCRC)相比,EOCRC具有一定的遗传易感性和独特的临床病理和分子特征。正如先前的出版物所示,EOCRC具有更晚期的TNM阶段和更具有侵袭性的肿瘤组织病理学。& lt; / br> & lt; / br>& lt; b>目的:& lt; / b>在本研究中,我们旨在根据临床病理特征评估EOCRC与AOCRC的异同。& lt; / br> & lt; / br>材料和方法:</b>2010年1月至2020年12月,394名符合纳入标准的患者在三级结直肠癌保健中心接受手术。患者分为EOCRC组(50岁及以下)和AOCRC组。采用pearson卡方检验比较独立组的分类变量。此外,对评价与年龄组关系的变量采用Backward方法进行logistic回归分析,P <0.100. & lt; / br> & lt; / br>& lt; b>结果:& lt; / b>我们的最终分析包括80例EOCRC病例和314例对照。EOCRC组与AOCRC组比较,性别、肿瘤部位、肿瘤T分期、生存率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.190, P = 0.924, P = 0.165, P = 0.574)。但在N分期、分化程度、淋巴血管侵袭(LVI)和神经周围侵袭(PNI)状态上差异有统计学意义,P值分别为:P = 0.006、P = 0.029、P = 0.019、P = 0.003。& lt; / br> & lt; / br>& lt; b>结论:& lt; / b>EOCRC比AOCRC具有更强的肿瘤生物学侵袭性。我们的研究表明,晚期N期、分化差、肿瘤沉积、LVI和PNI在EOCRC中更为常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊最新文献
Non-metallic foreign bodies - diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. Surgical removal of Aquafilling localized to different sites Experience in the use of endovenous methods and cell technologies in the treatment of trophic defects in patients with chronic venous insufficiency C6 Application of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) in treatment of gastrointestinal lesions- single center experience. Sequential, ultrasound-guided, minimally invasive pit-picking procedure with Nd:YAGlaser epilation treatment for pilonidal disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1