Treatment strategies for serotonin reuptake inhibitor-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: A network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY World Journal of Biological Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1080/15622975.2022.2082525
Satish Suhas, Palash Kumar Malo, Vijay Kumar, Thomas Gregor Issac, Nellai K Chithra, Binukumar Bhaskarapillai, Y C Janardhan Reddy, Naren P Rao
{"title":"Treatment strategies for serotonin reuptake inhibitor-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: A network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Satish Suhas,&nbsp;Palash Kumar Malo,&nbsp;Vijay Kumar,&nbsp;Thomas Gregor Issac,&nbsp;Nellai K Chithra,&nbsp;Binukumar Bhaskarapillai,&nbsp;Y C Janardhan Reddy,&nbsp;Naren P Rao","doi":"10.1080/15622975.2022.2082525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder is a chronic debilitating illness. We conducted a network meta-analysis [NMA] to compare the efficacy of all interventions in SRI-resistant OCD from published Randomised controlled trials [RCT].</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an NMA of RCTs in SRI resistant OCD from all modalities of treatments; pharmacological, psychological, neuromodulation, neurosurgery including deep brain stimulation. The design-by-treatment interaction inconsistency model within the frequentist framework was adopted with a change in Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale score as the primary outcome. We conducted sensitivity analyses excluding studies examining neurosurgical interventions, deep brain stimulation, studies in the paediatric population, and studies from a single geographical region. We also conducted analyses of interventions categorised into treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>55 RCTs examining 19 treatments or placebo involving 2011 participants were included in the NMA. Ondansetron [Standardised mean difference -2.01 (95% CI: -3.19, -0.83)], deep TMS [- 1.95 (-3.25, -0.65)], therapist administered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy [CBT-TA] [-1.46 (-2.93, 0.01)] and aripiprazole [-1.36 (-2.56, -0.17)] were ranked as the best four treatments on using the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking [SUCRA] percentage values (85.4%, 83.2%, 80.3%, 67.9% respectively). While all four interventions had large effect sizes, CBT[TA] narrowly missed statistical significance in our analysis. In sensitivity analyses, deep TMS was ranked as the best treatment strategy for SRI-resistant OCD. The small number of subjects in individual studies, higher confidence interval limits, and wider prediction interval for most agents warrant a cautious interpretation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering the principal analysis and sensitivity analyses together, deep TMS, ondansetron, CBT[TA], and aripiprazole may be considered a first-line intervention for SRI-resistant OCD in adults.</p><p><strong>Other: </strong>This work was not funded. The NMA has been registered with PROSPERO, [Registration number: CRD42020173589].</p>","PeriodicalId":49358,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2022.2082525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objectives: Treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder is a chronic debilitating illness. We conducted a network meta-analysis [NMA] to compare the efficacy of all interventions in SRI-resistant OCD from published Randomised controlled trials [RCT].

Methods: We performed an NMA of RCTs in SRI resistant OCD from all modalities of treatments; pharmacological, psychological, neuromodulation, neurosurgery including deep brain stimulation. The design-by-treatment interaction inconsistency model within the frequentist framework was adopted with a change in Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale score as the primary outcome. We conducted sensitivity analyses excluding studies examining neurosurgical interventions, deep brain stimulation, studies in the paediatric population, and studies from a single geographical region. We also conducted analyses of interventions categorised into treatment groups.

Results: 55 RCTs examining 19 treatments or placebo involving 2011 participants were included in the NMA. Ondansetron [Standardised mean difference -2.01 (95% CI: -3.19, -0.83)], deep TMS [- 1.95 (-3.25, -0.65)], therapist administered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy [CBT-TA] [-1.46 (-2.93, 0.01)] and aripiprazole [-1.36 (-2.56, -0.17)] were ranked as the best four treatments on using the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking [SUCRA] percentage values (85.4%, 83.2%, 80.3%, 67.9% respectively). While all four interventions had large effect sizes, CBT[TA] narrowly missed statistical significance in our analysis. In sensitivity analyses, deep TMS was ranked as the best treatment strategy for SRI-resistant OCD. The small number of subjects in individual studies, higher confidence interval limits, and wider prediction interval for most agents warrant a cautious interpretation.

Conclusions: Considering the principal analysis and sensitivity analyses together, deep TMS, ondansetron, CBT[TA], and aripiprazole may be considered a first-line intervention for SRI-resistant OCD in adults.

Other: This work was not funded. The NMA has been registered with PROSPERO, [Registration number: CRD42020173589].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血清素再摄取抑制剂抵抗性强迫症的治疗策略:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
目的:难治性强迫症是一种慢性衰弱性疾病。我们进行了一项网络荟萃分析[NMA]来比较已发表的随机对照试验[RCT]中所有干预措施对sri抗性强迫症的疗效。方法:我们对所有治疗方式的SRI抵抗性强迫症的随机对照试验进行了NMA;药理学,心理学,神经调节,神经外科包括脑深部刺激。采用频率主义框架内的设计-治疗交互不一致模型,以耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表得分的变化作为主要结果。我们进行了敏感性分析,排除了神经外科干预、深部脑刺激、儿科人群研究和单一地理区域的研究。我们还对不同治疗组的干预措施进行了分析。结果:55项随机对照试验检查了19种治疗方法或安慰剂,涉及2011名参与者,纳入了NMA。昂丹司琼[标准化平均差-2.01 (95% CI: -3.19, -0.83)]、深度TMS[- 1.95(-3.25, -0.65)]、治疗师给予认知行为治疗[CBT-TA][-1.46(-2.93, 0.01)]和阿立哌唑[-1.36(-2.56,-0.17)]被评为使用表面的最佳4种治疗方法,其累积排名[SUCRA]百分比值分别为85.4%、83.2%、80.3%、67.9%。虽然所有四种干预措施都有很大的效应量,但CBT[TA]在我们的分析中几乎没有统计学意义。在敏感性分析中,深度经颅磁刺激被列为耐药强迫症的最佳治疗策略。个别研究的受试者数量少,置信区间限高,大多数药物的预测区间较宽,因此需要谨慎解释。结论:综合考虑主要分析和敏感性分析,深度经颅磁刺激、昂丹司琼、CBT[TA]和阿立哌唑可作为治疗成人耐药强迫症的一线干预措施。其他:这项工作没有得到资助。NMA已在PROSPERO注册,[注册号:CRD42020173589]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry is to increase the worldwide communication of knowledge in clinical and basic research on biological psychiatry. Its target audience is thus clinical psychiatrists, educators, scientists and students interested in biological psychiatry. The composition of The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry , with its diverse categories that allow communication of a great variety of information, ensures that it is of interest to a wide range of readers. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry is a major clinically oriented journal on biological psychiatry. The opportunity to educate (through critical review papers, treatment guidelines and consensus reports), publish original work and observations (original papers and brief reports) and to express personal opinions (Letters to the Editor) makes The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry an extremely important medium in the field of biological psychiatry all over the world.
期刊最新文献
Optimisation of pharmacotherapy in psychiatry through therapeutic drug monitoring, molecular brain imaging and pharmacogenetic tests: Focus on antipsychotics. Cytokine gene polymorphisms and suicide risk in an Indian ancestral population: A case-control study. Correlations between alterations in global brain functional connectivity in patients with major depressive disorder and their genetic characteristics. Morphological correlates of anxiety-related experiences during a ketamine infusion. Weekly transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) maintenance: a case series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1