The perils of succor: The European Union's financial role in the Western Balkans during COVID-19

IF 2.7 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE European Policy Analysis Pub Date : 2020-12-14 DOI:10.1002/epa2.1102
Albana Shehaj
{"title":"The perils of succor: The European Union's financial role in the Western Balkans during COVID-19","authors":"Albana Shehaj","doi":"10.1002/epa2.1102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Western Balkans' response to the first wave of COVID-19 was efficient and swift. The countries’ capacity to mitigate the crisis has been vastly facilitated by EU fiscal disbursements. The funds have enabled governments to implement health and economic policies that counteract the crisis' socioeconomic repercussions. In this article, I examine the temporal effects of EU conditionality on the health outcomes and democratic governance of Balkan states. Identifying three features of the domestic political context—government accountability, the strength of opposition parties, and judicial system effectiveness—I assess the likelihood of divergent effects of the funds on health and democratic outcomes. I argue that while beneficial in the short term, in the long run, the EU funds risk enabling state capture and inadvertently jeopardizing the Western Balkans' post-pandemic democratic prospects. I empirically substantiate my argument by examining the relationship between prior EU allocations (Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance) and clientelism in WB states during 2007–2017.</p>","PeriodicalId":52190,"journal":{"name":"European Policy Analysis","volume":"6 2","pages":"264-276"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/epa2.1102","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Policy Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epa2.1102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The Western Balkans' response to the first wave of COVID-19 was efficient and swift. The countries’ capacity to mitigate the crisis has been vastly facilitated by EU fiscal disbursements. The funds have enabled governments to implement health and economic policies that counteract the crisis' socioeconomic repercussions. In this article, I examine the temporal effects of EU conditionality on the health outcomes and democratic governance of Balkan states. Identifying three features of the domestic political context—government accountability, the strength of opposition parties, and judicial system effectiveness—I assess the likelihood of divergent effects of the funds on health and democratic outcomes. I argue that while beneficial in the short term, in the long run, the EU funds risk enabling state capture and inadvertently jeopardizing the Western Balkans' post-pandemic democratic prospects. I empirically substantiate my argument by examining the relationship between prior EU allocations (Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance) and clientelism in WB states during 2007–2017.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
援助的危险:2019冠状病毒病期间欧盟在西巴尔干地区的财政作用
西巴尔干地区对第一波COVID-19的反应是有效和迅速的。欧盟财政支出极大地促进了这些国家缓解危机的能力。这些资金使各国政府能够实施卫生和经济政策,抵消危机的社会经济影响。在本文中,我研究了欧盟条件对巴尔干国家健康结果和民主治理的时间影响。确定了国内政治环境的三个特征——政府问责制、反对党的力量和司法系统的有效性——我评估了资金对健康和民主结果产生不同影响的可能性。我认为,尽管从短期来看是有益的,但从长期来看,欧盟的资金可能会导致国家被控制,并无意中危及西巴尔干地区大流行后的民主前景。我通过研究2007-2017年期间欧盟先前拨款(加入前援助工具)与世行国家的庇护主义之间的关系,实证地证实了我的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Policy Analysis
European Policy Analysis Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Networks and perception in European policymaking Is who they are, what they prefer? Understanding bureaucratic elites' policy preferences for European integration of government accounting Explaining differences in policy learning in the EU "Fit for 55” climate policy package Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1