A new high-resolution nationwide aboveground carbon map for Brazil

IF 1.7 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Geo-Geography and Environment Pub Date : 2017-11-07 DOI:10.1002/geo2.45
Oskar Englund, Gerd Sparovek, Göran Berndes, Flavio Freitas, Jean P Ometto, Pedro Valle De Carvalho E Oliveira, Ciniro Costa Jr, David Lapola
{"title":"A new high-resolution nationwide aboveground carbon map for Brazil","authors":"Oskar Englund,&nbsp;Gerd Sparovek,&nbsp;Göran Berndes,&nbsp;Flavio Freitas,&nbsp;Jean P Ometto,&nbsp;Pedro Valle De Carvalho E Oliveira,&nbsp;Ciniro Costa Jr,&nbsp;David Lapola","doi":"10.1002/geo2.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Brazil is home to the largest tracts of tropical vegetation in the world, harbouring high levels of biodiversity and carbon. Several biomass maps have been produced for Brazil, using different approaches and methods, and for different purposes. These maps have been used to estimate historic, recent, and future carbon emissions from land use change (LUC). It can be difficult to determine which map to use for what purpose. The implications of using an unsuitable map can be significant, since the maps have large differences, both in terms of total carbon storage and its spatial distribution. This paper presents comparisons of Brazil's new ‘official’ carbon map; that is, the map used in the third national communication to the UNFCCC in 2016, with the former official map, and four carbon maps from the scientific literature. General strengths and weaknesses of the different maps are identified, including their suitability for different types of studies. No carbon map was found suitable for studies concerned with existing land use/cover (LULC) and LUC outside of existing forests, partly because they do not represent the current LULC sufficiently well, and partly because they generally overestimate carbon values for agricultural land. A new map of aboveground carbon is presented, which was created based on data from existing maps and an up-to-date LULC map. This new map reflects current LULC, has high accuracy and resolution (50 m), and a national coverage. It can be a useful alternative for scientific studies and policy initiatives concerned with existing LULC and LUC outside of existing forests, especially at local scales when high resolution is necessary, and/or outside the Amazon biome. We identify five ongoing climate policy initiatives in Brazil that can benefit from using this map.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":44089,"journal":{"name":"Geo-Geography and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/geo2.45","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geo-Geography and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/geo2.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Brazil is home to the largest tracts of tropical vegetation in the world, harbouring high levels of biodiversity and carbon. Several biomass maps have been produced for Brazil, using different approaches and methods, and for different purposes. These maps have been used to estimate historic, recent, and future carbon emissions from land use change (LUC). It can be difficult to determine which map to use for what purpose. The implications of using an unsuitable map can be significant, since the maps have large differences, both in terms of total carbon storage and its spatial distribution. This paper presents comparisons of Brazil's new ‘official’ carbon map; that is, the map used in the third national communication to the UNFCCC in 2016, with the former official map, and four carbon maps from the scientific literature. General strengths and weaknesses of the different maps are identified, including their suitability for different types of studies. No carbon map was found suitable for studies concerned with existing land use/cover (LULC) and LUC outside of existing forests, partly because they do not represent the current LULC sufficiently well, and partly because they generally overestimate carbon values for agricultural land. A new map of aboveground carbon is presented, which was created based on data from existing maps and an up-to-date LULC map. This new map reflects current LULC, has high accuracy and resolution (50 m), and a national coverage. It can be a useful alternative for scientific studies and policy initiatives concerned with existing LULC and LUC outside of existing forests, especially at local scales when high resolution is necessary, and/or outside the Amazon biome. We identify five ongoing climate policy initiatives in Brazil that can benefit from using this map.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西新的高分辨率全国地面碳地图
巴西拥有世界上最大的热带植被带,拥有高水平的生物多样性和碳。为了不同的目的,使用不同的途径和方法为巴西绘制了若干生物量图。这些地图已被用于估算历史、近期和未来土地利用变化(LUC)造成的碳排放。很难决定将哪个地图用于什么目的。使用不合适的地图可能会产生重大影响,因为这些地图在总碳储量及其空间分布方面存在很大差异。本文对巴西新的“官方”碳地图进行了比较;即2016年向《联合国气候变化框架公约》提交的第三份国家信息通报中使用的地图,与前官方地图和科学文献中的四张碳地图。确定了不同地图的一般优点和缺点,包括它们对不同类型研究的适用性。没有发现适合研究现有土地利用/覆盖(LULC)和现有森林以外的土地利用/覆盖(LUC)的碳图,部分原因是它们不能很好地代表当前的LULC,部分原因是它们通常高估了农业用地的碳价值。根据现有地图和最新的LULC地图的数据,绘制了一幅新的地上碳地图。这张新地图反映了当前的LULC,具有很高的精度和分辨率(50米),并且覆盖了全国。它可以作为一种有用的替代方案,用于有关现有森林和现有森林以外的土地利用和土地利用变化的科学研究和政策倡议,特别是在需要高分辨率的地方尺度上,和/或亚马逊生物群系以外。我们确定了巴西正在进行的五项气候政策倡议,这些倡议可以从使用该地图中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Geo is a fully open access international journal publishing original articles from across the spectrum of geographical and environmental research. Geo welcomes submissions which make a significant contribution to one or more of the journal’s aims. These are to: • encompass the breadth of geographical, environmental and related research, based on original scholarship in the sciences, social sciences and humanities; • bring new understanding to and enhance communication between geographical research agendas, including human-environment interactions, global North-South relations and academic-policy exchange; • advance spatial research and address the importance of geographical enquiry to the understanding of, and action about, contemporary issues; • foster methodological development, including collaborative forms of knowledge production, interdisciplinary approaches and the innovative use of quantitative and/or qualitative data sets; • publish research articles, review papers, data and digital humanities papers, and commentaries which are of international significance.
期刊最新文献
Place-based and people-centred: Principles for a socially inclusive Net Zero transition ‘Side-hustling’ in commercial agriculture among young university graduates in Ghana Electric feels: The role of visual methods in energy ‘futuring’ Street vendors as actors of a sustainable food system—The case of Mexico City Deep learning for sea surface temperature applications: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis and methodological approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1