Alternative Trust Sources: Reducing DNSSEC Signature Verification Operations with TLS

S. Donovan, N. Feamster
{"title":"Alternative Trust Sources: Reducing DNSSEC Signature Verification Operations with TLS","authors":"S. Donovan, N. Feamster","doi":"10.1145/2785956.2790001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DNSSEC has been in development for 20 years. It provides for provable security when retrieving domain names through the use of a public key infrastructure (PKI). Unfortunately, there is also significant overhead involved with DNSSEC: verifying certificate chains of signed DNS messages involves extra computation, queries to remote resolvers, additional transfers, and introduces added latency into the DNS query path. We pose the question: is it possible to achieve practical security without always verifying this certificate chain if we use a different, outside source of trust between resolvers? We believe we can. Namely, by using a long-lived, mutually authenticated TLS connection between pairs of DNS resolvers, we suggest that we can maintain near-equivalent levels of security with very little extra overhead compared to a non-DNSSEC enabled resolver. By using a reputation system or probabilistically verifying a portion of DNSSEC responses would allow for near-equivalent levels of security to be reached, even in the face of compromised resolvers.","PeriodicalId":268472,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Special Interest Group on Data Communication","volume":"33 50","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Special Interest Group on Data Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2785956.2790001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

DNSSEC has been in development for 20 years. It provides for provable security when retrieving domain names through the use of a public key infrastructure (PKI). Unfortunately, there is also significant overhead involved with DNSSEC: verifying certificate chains of signed DNS messages involves extra computation, queries to remote resolvers, additional transfers, and introduces added latency into the DNS query path. We pose the question: is it possible to achieve practical security without always verifying this certificate chain if we use a different, outside source of trust between resolvers? We believe we can. Namely, by using a long-lived, mutually authenticated TLS connection between pairs of DNS resolvers, we suggest that we can maintain near-equivalent levels of security with very little extra overhead compared to a non-DNSSEC enabled resolver. By using a reputation system or probabilistically verifying a portion of DNSSEC responses would allow for near-equivalent levels of security to be reached, even in the face of compromised resolvers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
替代信任源:使用TLS减少DNSSEC签名验证操作
DNSSEC已经发展了20年。它在通过使用公钥基础设施(PKI)检索域名时提供了可证明的安全性。不幸的是,DNSSEC也有很大的开销:验证签名DNS消息的证书链涉及额外的计算、对远程解析器的查询、额外的传输,并在DNS查询路径中引入额外的延迟。我们提出了一个问题:如果我们在解析器之间使用不同的外部信任源,是否有可能在不总是验证此证书链的情况下实现实际的安全性?我们相信我们可以。也就是说,通过在DNS解析器对之间使用长期的、相互认证的TLS连接,我们建议我们可以保持与非启用dnssec的解析器相比几乎相同的安全级别,并且开销很少。通过使用信誉系统或概率验证部分DNSSEC响应将允许达到接近相等的安全级别,即使面对受损的解析器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Alternative Trust Sources: Reducing DNSSEC Signature Verification Operations with TLS RPKI MIRO: Monitoring and Inspection of RPKI Objects Hopper: Decentralized Speculation-aware Cluster Scheduling at Scale Extreme Data-rate Scheduling for the Data Center Multi-Context TLS (mcTLS): Enabling Secure In-Network Functionality in TLS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1