Comparison of Noise Reduction Techniques for Dysarthric Speech Recognition

Davide Mulfari, G. Campobello, G. Gugliandolo, A. Celesti, M. Villari, N. Donato
{"title":"Comparison of Noise Reduction Techniques for Dysarthric Speech Recognition","authors":"Davide Mulfari, G. Campobello, G. Gugliandolo, A. Celesti, M. Villari, N. Donato","doi":"10.1109/MeMeA54994.2022.9856486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper investigates the impact of denoising techniques on a deep learning recognition system for speak-ers with dysarthria, i.e., a neuromotor speech disorder which compromises speech intelligibility and that affects approximately 46 million of people worldwide. In particular, we compare a manual noise reduction techniques with automatic approaches based on classical signal processing techniques, i.e. filtering and spectral analysis, as well as more recent deep learning techniques based on recurrent neural network models. Comparison results reported in this paper are based on a dataset with more than 21K audio files collected with the collaboration of 156 Italian native speakers with different disabilities that cause dysarthria speech impairment. Therefore, different diseases and dysarthric severity levels have been taken into account. Moreover, differently from several other studies related to automatic recognition systems, audio files considered in our analysis have been collected in real environments, with a very limited supervision and simply using users' smartphones. Our analysis shows that, in this context, the effectiveness of automatic denoising tools is quite limited, particularly for dysarthric speakers with severe grades of disorder. However, comparisons with the proposed manual denoising intervention provide new and interesting insights which can be effectively and easily exploited with the aim of empowering actual automatic dysarthric speech recognition systems and that could drive future research in this field.","PeriodicalId":106228,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA54994.2022.9856486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The paper investigates the impact of denoising techniques on a deep learning recognition system for speak-ers with dysarthria, i.e., a neuromotor speech disorder which compromises speech intelligibility and that affects approximately 46 million of people worldwide. In particular, we compare a manual noise reduction techniques with automatic approaches based on classical signal processing techniques, i.e. filtering and spectral analysis, as well as more recent deep learning techniques based on recurrent neural network models. Comparison results reported in this paper are based on a dataset with more than 21K audio files collected with the collaboration of 156 Italian native speakers with different disabilities that cause dysarthria speech impairment. Therefore, different diseases and dysarthric severity levels have been taken into account. Moreover, differently from several other studies related to automatic recognition systems, audio files considered in our analysis have been collected in real environments, with a very limited supervision and simply using users' smartphones. Our analysis shows that, in this context, the effectiveness of automatic denoising tools is quite limited, particularly for dysarthric speakers with severe grades of disorder. However, comparisons with the proposed manual denoising intervention provide new and interesting insights which can be effectively and easily exploited with the aim of empowering actual automatic dysarthric speech recognition systems and that could drive future research in this field.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
困难语音识别降噪技术的比较
本文研究了去噪技术对患有构音障碍的说话人的深度学习识别系统的影响,构音障碍是一种神经运动语言障碍,它损害了语言的可理解性,影响了全世界大约4600万人。特别地,我们比较了人工降噪技术与基于经典信号处理技术的自动方法,即滤波和频谱分析,以及最近基于循环神经网络模型的深度学习技术。本文报告的比较结果是基于一个数据集,该数据集包含超过21K的音频文件,该数据集是由156名不同残疾的意大利语母语人士合作收集的,这些残疾人士会导致构音障碍语言障碍。因此,考虑到不同的疾病和运动障碍的严重程度。此外,与其他几项与自动识别系统相关的研究不同,我们分析中考虑的音频文件是在真实环境中收集的,监督非常有限,并且只是使用用户的智能手机。我们的分析表明,在这种情况下,自动去噪工具的有效性是相当有限的,特别是对于重度障碍的发音困难者。然而,与提议的人工去噪干预的比较提供了新的和有趣的见解,这些见解可以有效和容易地利用,目的是增强实际的自动困难语音识别系统,并可以推动该领域的未来研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Time and Frequency domain analysis of APB muscles Abduction in adult dominant hand using surface electromyography signals Comparison of Noise Reduction Techniques for Dysarthric Speech Recognition Effects of ROI positioning on the measurement of engineered muscle tissue contractility with an optical tracking method Atrial Fibrillation Detection by Means of Edge Computing on Wearable Device: A Feasibility Assessment Unraveling the biological meaning of radiomic features
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1