Developing and Implementing a Hospital‑based Family-centered Health Approach for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Dorri N
{"title":"Developing and Implementing a Hospital‑based Family-centered Health Approach for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Dorri N","doi":"10.23880/mjccs-16000330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a family-centered health program in promoting healthier lifestyles and improving self-care behavior among patients who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention. We hypothesized that the family-centered health program would significantly enhance self-care and health-promoting lifestyle in this patient population. The current study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of the family-centered health program on healthpromoting lifestyle and self-care behavior in post-percutaneous coronary intervention patients. Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted from October 2021 to March 2022 at the Shaheed Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical & Research Center in Tehran. The study population included patients aged 40 to 65 who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention. Sixty eligible participants were selected through purposive sampling and randomly assigned to either an experimental group that underwent the family-centered health program (n=30) or a control group (n=30). Data were collected using a demographic information questionnaire, Walker’s health-promoting lifestyle questionnaire (1987), and Miller’s self-care behavior questionnaire (1982) at three time points: baseline, postintervention, and three-month follow-up. The intervention’s effectiveness was assessed using variance analysis with repeated measurements in SPSS-21 software. Results: Preliminary analyses revealed no significant differences between the groups in self-care, health-promoting lifestyle, or blood pressures, indicating the two groups were homogeneous at baseline. However, post-test comparisons revealed significant differences, suggesting the family-centered health program was effective (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Given the demonstrated effectiveness of the family-centered health program, prioritizing such interventions could significantly improve secondary prevention outcomes in patients surviving coronary heart disease.","PeriodicalId":356296,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Clinical Trials &amp; Case Studies","volume":" 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Clinical Trials &amp; Case Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/mjccs-16000330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a family-centered health program in promoting healthier lifestyles and improving self-care behavior among patients who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention. We hypothesized that the family-centered health program would significantly enhance self-care and health-promoting lifestyle in this patient population. The current study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of the family-centered health program on healthpromoting lifestyle and self-care behavior in post-percutaneous coronary intervention patients. Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted from October 2021 to March 2022 at the Shaheed Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical & Research Center in Tehran. The study population included patients aged 40 to 65 who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention. Sixty eligible participants were selected through purposive sampling and randomly assigned to either an experimental group that underwent the family-centered health program (n=30) or a control group (n=30). Data were collected using a demographic information questionnaire, Walker’s health-promoting lifestyle questionnaire (1987), and Miller’s self-care behavior questionnaire (1982) at three time points: baseline, postintervention, and three-month follow-up. The intervention’s effectiveness was assessed using variance analysis with repeated measurements in SPSS-21 software. Results: Preliminary analyses revealed no significant differences between the groups in self-care, health-promoting lifestyle, or blood pressures, indicating the two groups were homogeneous at baseline. However, post-test comparisons revealed significant differences, suggesting the family-centered health program was effective (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Given the demonstrated effectiveness of the family-centered health program, prioritizing such interventions could significantly improve secondary prevention outcomes in patients surviving coronary heart disease.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者制定和实施以医院为基础的以家庭为中心的健康方法:一项随机对照试验
目的:本研究旨在评估以家庭为中心的健康计划在促进经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者更健康的生活方式和改善自我护理行为方面的有效性。我们假设以家庭为中心的健康计划将显著提高患者群体的自我保健和促进健康的生活方式。本研究旨在探讨以家庭为中心的健康计划对经皮冠状动脉介入术后患者健康促进生活方式和自我护理行为的影响。材料与方法:2021年10月至2022年3月,在德黑兰Shaheed Rajaie心血管医学与研究中心进行了一项随机对照临床试验。研究人群包括40至65岁接受过经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者。通过有目的抽样选择60名符合条件的参与者,并随机分配到接受以家庭为中心的健康计划的实验组(n=30)或对照组(n=30)。采用人口统计信息问卷、Walker 's健康促进生活方式问卷(1987)和Miller 's自我保健行为问卷(1982)在基线、干预后和三个月随访三个时间点收集数据。采用SPSS-21软件中重复测量的方差分析评估干预的有效性。结果:初步分析显示,两组在自我护理、促进健康的生活方式或血压方面没有显著差异,表明两组在基线时是均匀的。然而,测试后比较显示了显著差异,表明以家庭为中心的健康计划是有效的(P < 0.001)。结论:考虑到以家庭为中心的健康项目的有效性,优先考虑这些干预措施可以显著改善冠心病患者的二级预防结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quaint Partners: Pheochromocytoma and Sealed Duodenal Perforation Developing and Implementing a Hospital‑based Family-centered Health Approach for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparison of Early vs Late Cholecystectomy Performed for Mild Gall Stone Pancreatitis in Terms of Mean Length of Hospital Stay Olive Oil and Mesenteric Panniculitis, A Possible Association Extra Pulmonary Manifestations of COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1