It's the platform, stupid (-; the elitist nature of sport podcast listeners

Y. Galily, T. Laor, Tal Samuel-Azran
{"title":"It's the platform, stupid (-; the elitist nature of sport podcast listeners","authors":"Y. Galily, T. Laor, Tal Samuel-Azran","doi":"10.1108/oir-12-2021-0684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeDespite the ability of podcasts to bring free quality content to the masses, studies found that podcast consumption have been identified mostly with the elite class, thus increasing knowledge gaps and digital divides. This study aims to examine whether this trend extends to non-elitist podcast genres by providing the first analysis of sport podcast demographics and uses and gratifications.Design/methodology/approachA survey was conducted among Israel’s three most popular sport podcast listeners (N = 503), examining the listeners’ demographics, consumption patterns and uses and gratifications driving them to listen to the podcast.FindingsThe analysis reveals that most listeners are secular millennials males with above average income, highlighting the elitist nature of sport podcast consumers. The analysis further revealed that information-rich groups were more likely to tune in for information acquisition whereas other groups used it more for entertainment and escapist purposes.Practical implicationsFor policy makers and educators who wish to promote podcast-based initiatives to narrow social gaps, the analysis strengthens the notion that the podcast platform mostly attracts those who are already information rich and thus increase knowledge gaps and digital divides. For sport broadcasters, the analysis illuminates sport podcasts audiences’ demographics and their uses of the platform.Social implicationsThe study reflects that the podcast platform is identified with elitist listening even in non-elitist genres; thus it further increases the already wide knowledge gap and digital divides promoted by the advent of the podcast platform.Originality/valueThe study is the first to highlight the elitist nature of sport podcast listeners’ demographics, indicating that the podcast platform increases the knowledge gap also even across non-elitist content genres such as sport content.Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-12-2021-0684","PeriodicalId":143302,"journal":{"name":"Online Inf. Rev.","volume":"223 18","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Inf. Rev.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-12-2021-0684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeDespite the ability of podcasts to bring free quality content to the masses, studies found that podcast consumption have been identified mostly with the elite class, thus increasing knowledge gaps and digital divides. This study aims to examine whether this trend extends to non-elitist podcast genres by providing the first analysis of sport podcast demographics and uses and gratifications.Design/methodology/approachA survey was conducted among Israel’s three most popular sport podcast listeners (N = 503), examining the listeners’ demographics, consumption patterns and uses and gratifications driving them to listen to the podcast.FindingsThe analysis reveals that most listeners are secular millennials males with above average income, highlighting the elitist nature of sport podcast consumers. The analysis further revealed that information-rich groups were more likely to tune in for information acquisition whereas other groups used it more for entertainment and escapist purposes.Practical implicationsFor policy makers and educators who wish to promote podcast-based initiatives to narrow social gaps, the analysis strengthens the notion that the podcast platform mostly attracts those who are already information rich and thus increase knowledge gaps and digital divides. For sport broadcasters, the analysis illuminates sport podcasts audiences’ demographics and their uses of the platform.Social implicationsThe study reflects that the podcast platform is identified with elitist listening even in non-elitist genres; thus it further increases the already wide knowledge gap and digital divides promoted by the advent of the podcast platform.Originality/valueThe study is the first to highlight the elitist nature of sport podcast listeners’ demographics, indicating that the podcast platform increases the knowledge gap also even across non-elitist content genres such as sport content.Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-12-2021-0684
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这是平台,笨蛋。体育播客听众的精英特质
尽管播客能够为大众带来免费的优质内容,但研究发现,播客消费主要集中在精英阶层,从而增加了知识差距和数字鸿沟。本研究旨在通过对体育播客的人口统计、使用和满意度的首次分析,来检验这种趋势是否延伸到非精英播客类型。设计/方法/方法对以色列三个最受欢迎的体育播客听众(N = 503)进行了一项调查,研究了听众的人口统计数据、消费模式以及驱使他们收听播客的用途和满足感。分析显示,大多数听众是收入高于平均水平的世俗千禧一代男性,凸显了体育播客消费者的精英主义本质。分析进一步显示,信息丰富的群体更有可能为了获取信息而收看电视,而其他群体则更多地将其用于娱乐和逃避现实的目的。对于那些希望推动基于播客的倡议以缩小社会差距的政策制定者和教育工作者来说,该分析强化了这样一种观点,即播客平台主要吸引的是那些已经拥有丰富信息的人,从而增加了知识差距和数字鸿沟。对于体育广播公司,该分析阐明了体育播客观众的人口统计数据及其对平台的使用情况。社会意义:研究表明,即使是非精英音乐类型,播客平台也被认为是精英音乐;因此,它进一步加剧了播客平台的出现所带来的本已广泛的知识差距和数字鸿沟。这项研究首次强调了体育播客听众人口统计的精英性质,表明播客平台甚至在非精英内容类型(如体育内容)之间也增加了知识差距。同行评议本文的同行评议历史可在:https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-12-2021-0684
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Online political engagement, cognitive skills and engagement with misinformation: evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa and the United States It's the platform, stupid (-; the elitist nature of sport podcast listeners Tweet for peace: Twitter as a medium for developing a peace discourse in the hands of the Greek-Cypriot and Turkish-Cypriot leaders COVID-19 fake news among the general population: motives, sociodemographic, attitude/behavior and impacts - a systematic review Museums and communicating climate change-related issues on Facebook platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1