Interventions: Postcolonial, Agency and Resistance

R. J. Young
{"title":"Interventions: Postcolonial, Agency and Resistance","authors":"R. J. Young","doi":"10.5840/JPHILNEPAL201171617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"(Yubraj Aryal interviewed Robert Young on postcolonial studies. Mr. Aryal focused his questions on the issues of postcolonial agency, resistance and new models of political and cultural practices in postcolonial studies.) Y. A.: Since you are editing a leading journal, Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, what \"interventions\" are you making in the postcolonial fields in terms of postcolonial agency, modes of resistance, and the emergence of new models of political and cultural practice of alternative communities? What forms of new knowledge have you been attempting to produce in the field since 1998? How can academic and non-academic experiences of alternative communities, like that of Nepali communities, for instance, be of interest to your journal? What has characterized the postcolonia in the past decade from the point of view of my first three questions? R.Y.: Because it is conditioned by history, the postcolonial is always in a situation of transformation. The political context is always changing, and the interventions that we make will always be shifting as a result from year to year. The global political scene has altered profoundly since the journal began in 1998, most notably of course 9/11 and its aftermath, but also in other arenas such as the high profile developments of indigenous struggles in Latin America, Australasia, South Asia and elsewhere. I don't think there is anything that we could call \"postcolonial agency\" as such: rather there are forms of agency which manifest themselves in specific situations, particularly those of resistance and, one might add, triumph. Agency itself is governed by the conditions of its production. So if we take the Arab Spring, for example, we can see that the agency there is at once individual and collective, and takes the form not only of protest but a general withdrawal of consent to power. Ultimately, in a revolutionary situation, this is the most formidable kind of agency, because it means that the revolution is coming from below, rather than from a vanguard elite (a situation which always poses trouble). With respect to new forms of knowledge, we have not ourselves been trying to produce them as such, though we do when we can, but rather to see the journal as a vehicle by which others can be enabled to produce and articulate new forms of knowledge, particularly those which go outside conventional academic protocols. We are particularly interested in knowledge that proceeds from everyday life, from people whose knowledge does not typically count as real or authorized knowledge, and from those who are struggling to articulate their own knowledges within frameworks that do not easily accommodate them. With respect to Nepali communities, we have been much less active than I should have liked, and this is of course related to the material which we receive and the contacts which we have. But we should have been more proactive in seeking out material from (rather than merely about) Nepal. Y. A.: Who is the postcolonial subject (if there is any)? There is a general view that this subject is constructed by colonial residues. I see an ethical problem with this view because it assumes an impoverished form of agency. A dynamic understanding of the postcolonial subject, I believe, includes a conception of the self who resides outside of the postcolonial or outside of any set of political categories. It is not an effect of colonialism, but a difference a subject makes from colonialism. Do you agree? R.Y.: I'm not sure that there are 'postcolonial subjects' as such--that seems to me to give too much primacy to the postcolonial in the exercise and experience of everyday life. Of course there are subjects who are determined in various ways by the effects of the postcolonial, immediate or, as you put it, more with respect to colonial residues. To take one example, many subjects in postcolonial societies are subjected to the rule of law, and the legal system as a rule operates seamlessly with that which was established under colonial rule. …","PeriodicalId":288505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry","volume":"68 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/JPHILNEPAL201171617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

(Yubraj Aryal interviewed Robert Young on postcolonial studies. Mr. Aryal focused his questions on the issues of postcolonial agency, resistance and new models of political and cultural practices in postcolonial studies.) Y. A.: Since you are editing a leading journal, Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, what "interventions" are you making in the postcolonial fields in terms of postcolonial agency, modes of resistance, and the emergence of new models of political and cultural practice of alternative communities? What forms of new knowledge have you been attempting to produce in the field since 1998? How can academic and non-academic experiences of alternative communities, like that of Nepali communities, for instance, be of interest to your journal? What has characterized the postcolonia in the past decade from the point of view of my first three questions? R.Y.: Because it is conditioned by history, the postcolonial is always in a situation of transformation. The political context is always changing, and the interventions that we make will always be shifting as a result from year to year. The global political scene has altered profoundly since the journal began in 1998, most notably of course 9/11 and its aftermath, but also in other arenas such as the high profile developments of indigenous struggles in Latin America, Australasia, South Asia and elsewhere. I don't think there is anything that we could call "postcolonial agency" as such: rather there are forms of agency which manifest themselves in specific situations, particularly those of resistance and, one might add, triumph. Agency itself is governed by the conditions of its production. So if we take the Arab Spring, for example, we can see that the agency there is at once individual and collective, and takes the form not only of protest but a general withdrawal of consent to power. Ultimately, in a revolutionary situation, this is the most formidable kind of agency, because it means that the revolution is coming from below, rather than from a vanguard elite (a situation which always poses trouble). With respect to new forms of knowledge, we have not ourselves been trying to produce them as such, though we do when we can, but rather to see the journal as a vehicle by which others can be enabled to produce and articulate new forms of knowledge, particularly those which go outside conventional academic protocols. We are particularly interested in knowledge that proceeds from everyday life, from people whose knowledge does not typically count as real or authorized knowledge, and from those who are struggling to articulate their own knowledges within frameworks that do not easily accommodate them. With respect to Nepali communities, we have been much less active than I should have liked, and this is of course related to the material which we receive and the contacts which we have. But we should have been more proactive in seeking out material from (rather than merely about) Nepal. Y. A.: Who is the postcolonial subject (if there is any)? There is a general view that this subject is constructed by colonial residues. I see an ethical problem with this view because it assumes an impoverished form of agency. A dynamic understanding of the postcolonial subject, I believe, includes a conception of the self who resides outside of the postcolonial or outside of any set of political categories. It is not an effect of colonialism, but a difference a subject makes from colonialism. Do you agree? R.Y.: I'm not sure that there are 'postcolonial subjects' as such--that seems to me to give too much primacy to the postcolonial in the exercise and experience of everyday life. Of course there are subjects who are determined in various ways by the effects of the postcolonial, immediate or, as you put it, more with respect to colonial residues. To take one example, many subjects in postcolonial societies are subjected to the rule of law, and the legal system as a rule operates seamlessly with that which was established under colonial rule. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干预:后殖民、代理和抵抗
Yubraj Aryal就后殖民研究采访了Robert Young。阿亚尔的问题集中在后殖民机构、抵抗以及后殖民研究中政治和文化实践的新模式等问题上。)答:既然你是《干预:国际后殖民研究杂志》的主编,那么你在后殖民领域进行了哪些“干预”,包括后殖民机构、抵抗模式,以及另类社区的政治和文化实践新模式的出现?自1998年以来,您一直在尝试在该领域产生哪些形式的新知识?另类社群的学术与非学术经验,例如尼泊尔社群的经验,如何会成为你的期刊感兴趣的内容?从我的前三个问题来看,过去十年的后殖民主义有什么特点?r.y.:由于受历史的制约,后殖民总是处于一种转型的状态。政治环境总是在变化,我们所做的干预也会因此每年都在变化。自1998年创刊以来,全球政治舞台发生了深刻的变化,最显著的当然是9/11事件及其后果,但也在其他领域,如拉丁美洲、澳大拉西亚、南亚和其他地方的土著斗争的高调发展。我不认为有什么我们可以称之为“后殖民能动性”的东西:相反,有一些形式的能动性在特定的情况下表现出来,特别是在抵抗和胜利的情况下。代理本身受其生产条件的支配。因此,如果我们以阿拉伯之春为例,我们可以看到,那里的机构既是个人的,也是集体的,其形式不仅是抗议,而且是对权力的普遍撤回。最终,在革命形势下,这是最令人生畏的一种机构,因为这意味着革命来自下层,而不是来自先锋精英(这种形势总是会带来麻烦)。关于新形式的知识,我们自己并没有试图去创造它们,尽管我们在可能的时候会这样做,而是把期刊看作一个工具,通过它,其他人可以创造和阐明新形式的知识,特别是那些超越传统学术协议的知识。我们特别感兴趣的是来自日常生活的知识,来自那些通常不被视为真实或授权知识的人的知识,以及那些在不容易适应他们的框架中努力表达自己知识的人的知识。关于尼泊尔社区,我们的活跃程度远远低于我的期望,这当然与我们收到的材料和我们的联系有关。但我们本应更积极主动地从尼泊尔(而不仅仅是关于尼泊尔)寻找材料。雅:谁是后殖民主体(如果有的话)?有一种普遍的观点认为,这门学科是由殖民残余构成的。我看到了这种观点的道德问题,因为它假设了一种贫乏的代理形式。我相信,对后殖民主体的动态理解,包括一个存在于后殖民或任何一套政治范畴之外的自我概念。这不是殖民主义的影响,而是主体从殖民主义中产生的差异。你同意吗?r.y.:我不确定是否有这样的“后殖民主题”——在我看来,在后殖民在日常生活的锻炼和体验中显得过于重要。当然,也有一些主体以不同的方式受到后殖民影响的影响,直接的,或者,如你所说,更多的是与殖民残余有关。例如,后殖民社会中的许多主体都受到法治的约束,法律体系作为一种规则,与殖民统治下建立的法律体系无缝地运作。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emily Dickinson: What Is Called Thinking at the Edge of Chaos? Relational Selves: Gender and Cultural Differences in Moral Reasoning Late Pound: The Case of Canto CVII The Reproduction of Subjectivity and the Turnover-time of Ideology: Speculating with German Idealism, Marx, and Adorno Toward an Ethics of Speculative Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1