Colormap-Based Effectiveness of Basic Visualizations

Chunzhu Mi
{"title":"Colormap-Based Effectiveness of Basic Visualizations","authors":"Chunzhu Mi","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1001735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When designing visual charts, effective color coding can help users access data information faster and more accurately. Colormaps are a commonly used method for scalar data visualization,which are usually designed using algorithmic techniques. However, the effectiveness of colormaps in mapping data to colors in visualization charts is not clear at present. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of colormaps application in visualization charts, this paper takes four basic visualization charts (bar chart, pie chart, scatter chart, and line chart) as the research object, and takes task completion time and accuracy rate as the index, quantitatively analyzing the application of blue, coolwarm, viridis, and jet in visualization charts. In addition, the Likert scale method was used to understand the subjective perception of users of the color maps.The results showes that the use of different colormaps had no significant effect on the participants' response time and correctness in completing the bar chart task, and a very significant effect on the pie and scatter charts. Participants were most accurate and took the shortest time on the graphs coded with viridis. The longest time was spent on the chart coded with blue and the accuracy was lower. The results of the Likert scale assessment showed that users found blue to be the least easy to read and the least aesthetically pleasing, and jet to be the most aesthetically pleasing and easy to read.","PeriodicalId":409565,"journal":{"name":"Usability and User Experience","volume":"28 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Usability and User Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1001735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When designing visual charts, effective color coding can help users access data information faster and more accurately. Colormaps are a commonly used method for scalar data visualization,which are usually designed using algorithmic techniques. However, the effectiveness of colormaps in mapping data to colors in visualization charts is not clear at present. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of colormaps application in visualization charts, this paper takes four basic visualization charts (bar chart, pie chart, scatter chart, and line chart) as the research object, and takes task completion time and accuracy rate as the index, quantitatively analyzing the application of blue, coolwarm, viridis, and jet in visualization charts. In addition, the Likert scale method was used to understand the subjective perception of users of the color maps.The results showes that the use of different colormaps had no significant effect on the participants' response time and correctness in completing the bar chart task, and a very significant effect on the pie and scatter charts. Participants were most accurate and took the shortest time on the graphs coded with viridis. The longest time was spent on the chart coded with blue and the accuracy was lower. The results of the Likert scale assessment showed that users found blue to be the least easy to read and the least aesthetically pleasing, and jet to be the most aesthetically pleasing and easy to read.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于颜色图的基本可视化效果
在设计可视化图表时,有效的颜色编码可以帮助用户更快、更准确地获取数据信息。色图是一种常用的标量数据可视化方法,通常使用算法技术进行设计。然而,目前颜色图在将数据映射到可视化图表中的颜色方面的有效性尚不明确。为了评价颜色图在可视化图表中的应用效果,本文以柱状图、饼状图、散点图和折线图四种基本的可视化图表为研究对象,以任务完成时间和准确率为指标,定量分析了蓝色、冷暖色、翠绿色和喷色在可视化图表中的应用。此外,采用李克特量表法来了解用户对彩色地图的主观感知。结果表明,不同颜色图的使用对被试完成柱状图任务的反应时间和正确性没有显著影响,而对饼图和散点图任务的影响非常显著。参与者在用绿条纹编码的图表上最准确,花的时间最短。在用蓝色编码的图表上花费的时间最长,准确性较低。李克特量表评估的结果显示,用户认为蓝色是最不容易阅读和最不美观的,而黑色是最美观和最容易阅读的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Colormap-Based Effectiveness of Basic Visualizations Eliciting potential for positive UX using psychological needs: Towards a user-centered method to identify technologies for UX in the car interior Heuristic Evaluation of Public Service Chatbots Deep Analysis of the Web Accessibility and Usability of Videoconferencing Platforms for Blind People Controlled experimentation to improve the usability of business management systems: UDA-ERP case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1