On the Question of Using the Term “Dry Law” in relation to the Anti-Alcohol Legislation in the USSR during the Years of Perestroika

Т.Л. Соколова
{"title":"On the Question of Using the Term “Dry Law” in relation to the Anti-Alcohol Legislation in the USSR during the Years of Perestroika","authors":"Т.Л. Соколова","doi":"10.46741/2713-2811.2022.18.3.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Актуальность проблемы исследования заключается в необходимости изучения содержания и сущности широко используемого в современной науке и журналистике термина «сухой закон» применительно к антиалкогольной кампании 1985–1988 гг. В статье предпринята попытка проанализировать отечественные и зарубежные работы, посвященные проблеме введения антиалкогольных мер, называемых сухим законом. Автор сравнивает комплексы запретов, реализованные в США в 1918–1933 гг., в Российской империи в 1914–1920-х гг. и в СССР в период перестройки, и приходит к выводу, что использование термина «сухой закон» для характеристики антиалкогольных мер в 1985–1988 гг. неуместно в связи с несоответствием его значения проводимой в алкогольной сфере в тот период политике.\n The relevance of the research problem lies in the need to study the content and essence of the term “dry law” widely used in modern science and journalism in relation to the 1985–1988 anti-alcohol campaign. The article attempts to analyze domestic and foreign works devoted to the problem of introducing anti-alcohol measures called the dry law. The author compares the complexes of prohibitions implemented in the USA in 1918–1933, the Russian Empire in 1914– 1920, and the USSR during the period of perestroika, and comes to the conclusion that the use of the term “dry law” to characterize anti-alcohol measures in 1985– 1988 is inappropriate due to the inconsistency of its meaning with the policy pursued in the alcohol sphere at that time","PeriodicalId":119927,"journal":{"name":"Ius Publicum et Privatum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ius Publicum et Privatum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46741/2713-2811.2022.18.3.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Актуальность проблемы исследования заключается в необходимости изучения содержания и сущности широко используемого в современной науке и журналистике термина «сухой закон» применительно к антиалкогольной кампании 1985–1988 гг. В статье предпринята попытка проанализировать отечественные и зарубежные работы, посвященные проблеме введения антиалкогольных мер, называемых сухим законом. Автор сравнивает комплексы запретов, реализованные в США в 1918–1933 гг., в Российской империи в 1914–1920-х гг. и в СССР в период перестройки, и приходит к выводу, что использование термина «сухой закон» для характеристики антиалкогольных мер в 1985–1988 гг. неуместно в связи с несоответствием его значения проводимой в алкогольной сфере в тот период политике. The relevance of the research problem lies in the need to study the content and essence of the term “dry law” widely used in modern science and journalism in relation to the 1985–1988 anti-alcohol campaign. The article attempts to analyze domestic and foreign works devoted to the problem of introducing anti-alcohol measures called the dry law. The author compares the complexes of prohibitions implemented in the USA in 1918–1933, the Russian Empire in 1914– 1920, and the USSR during the period of perestroika, and comes to the conclusion that the use of the term “dry law” to characterize anti-alcohol measures in 1985– 1988 is inappropriate due to the inconsistency of its meaning with the policy pursued in the alcohol sphere at that time
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于在苏联改革时期的禁酒立法中使用"禁酒法"一词的问题
研究问题的紧固性在于需要研究1985 - 1988年禁酒运动中广泛使用的“禁酒法”一词的内容和实质。该条试图分析国内外关于禁酒措施的著作,即禁酒法。作者比较赴美禁令实施情结1918年至1933年,俄罗斯帝国在1914 - 1920年代苏联时期改建,并得出结论,使用术语“禁酒令”为特征,禁酒措施在1985 - 1988年间,由于不恰当的差异他酒业领域在那个时期政策的重要性。1985年至1988年,《现代科学》杂志刊登了《现代科学与杂志》。这首歌是由阿特姆斯的《阿特姆斯的家》和《福格斯的作品》改编的。戏剧的compares The complexes of prohibitions implemented in The USA in 1918年至1933年,The俄罗斯Empire in 1914 - 1920年,and The USSR during The时段of perestroika and come to The conclusion that The use of The term " dry law to characterize anti - alcohol措施in 1985 - 1988 is inappropriate due to The inconsistency of its《with The policy pursued in The alcohol sphere at that time
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Describing problematic aspects for general jurisdiction courts to award compensation for the lack of hot water supply in cells of correctional facilities, pre-trial detention facilities of the Russian penitentiary system Effectiveness of certain methods of criminal prosecution in relation to smuggling Regulation of legal relations of lawyers’ confidential assistance to bodies conducting law enforcement intelligence operations: legal conflict and ways to resolve it Considering a free pardon concept in activities of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation Law enforcement fictions in criminal law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1