Graph Processing Platforms at Scale: Practices and Experiences

Seung-Hwan Lim, S. Lee, Gautam Ganesh, Tyler C. Brown, S. Sukumar
{"title":"Graph Processing Platforms at Scale: Practices and Experiences","authors":"Seung-Hwan Lim, S. Lee, Gautam Ganesh, Tyler C. Brown, S. Sukumar","doi":"10.1109/ISPASS.2015.7095783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Graph analysis has revealed patterns and relationships hidden in data from a variety of domains such as transportation networks, social networks, clinical pathways, and collaboration networks. As these networks grow in size, variety and complexity, it is a challenge to find the right combination of tools and implementation of algorithms to discover new insights from the data. Addressing this challenge, our study presents an extensive empirical evaluation of three representative graph processing platforms: Pegasus, GraphX, and Urika. Each system represents a combination of options in data model, processing paradigm, and infrastructure. We benchmark each platform using three popular graph mining operations, degree distribution, connected components, and PageRank over real-world graphs. Our experiments show that each graph processing platform owns a particular strength for different types of graph operations. While Urika performs the best in non-iterative graph operations like degree distribution, GraphX outperforms iterative operations like connected components and PageRank. We conclude this paper by discussing options to optimize the performance of a graph-theoretic operation on each platform for large-scale real world graphs.","PeriodicalId":189378,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS)","volume":"55 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPASS.2015.7095783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Graph analysis has revealed patterns and relationships hidden in data from a variety of domains such as transportation networks, social networks, clinical pathways, and collaboration networks. As these networks grow in size, variety and complexity, it is a challenge to find the right combination of tools and implementation of algorithms to discover new insights from the data. Addressing this challenge, our study presents an extensive empirical evaluation of three representative graph processing platforms: Pegasus, GraphX, and Urika. Each system represents a combination of options in data model, processing paradigm, and infrastructure. We benchmark each platform using three popular graph mining operations, degree distribution, connected components, and PageRank over real-world graphs. Our experiments show that each graph processing platform owns a particular strength for different types of graph operations. While Urika performs the best in non-iterative graph operations like degree distribution, GraphX outperforms iterative operations like connected components and PageRank. We conclude this paper by discussing options to optimize the performance of a graph-theoretic operation on each platform for large-scale real world graphs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大规模图形处理平台:实践与经验
图形分析揭示了隐藏在各种领域数据中的模式和关系,如交通网络、社会网络、临床途径和协作网络。随着这些网络在规模、多样性和复杂性方面的增长,找到工具和算法的正确组合以从数据中发现新的见解是一个挑战。为了应对这一挑战,我们的研究对三个代表性的图形处理平台:Pegasus、GraphX和Urika进行了广泛的实证评估。每个系统都代表了数据模型、处理范例和基础设施中的选项组合。我们使用三种流行的图挖掘操作,度分布,连接组件和真实世界图的PageRank对每个平台进行基准测试。我们的实验表明,对于不同类型的图操作,每个图处理平台都具有特定的强度。虽然Urika在度分布等非迭代图操作中表现最好,但GraphX优于连接组件和PageRank等迭代操作。我们通过讨论在每个平台上优化大规模真实世界图的图论操作性能的选项来结束本文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Graph Processing Platforms at Scale: Practices and Experiences Self-monitoring overhead of the Linux perf_ event performance counter interface Analyzing communication models for distributed thread-collaborative processors in terms of energy and time A full-system approach to analyze the impact of next-generation mobile flash storage Graph-matching-based simulation-region selection for multiple binaries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1