The Moralization of Labor: Establishing the Social Responsibility of Employers for Disabled Workers

Eva Nadai, Alan Canonica
{"title":"The Moralization of Labor: Establishing the Social Responsibility of Employers for Disabled Workers","authors":"Eva Nadai, Alan Canonica","doi":"10.1108/S0733-558X20190000063013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a “fictitious commodity” (Polanyi), that cannot be separated from the human being who is its owner, labor has a special moral significance. However, this moral quality is not a given but must be asserted in struggles over the value of labor. With the example of disabled workers in Switzerland, this chapter examines the moralization of labor as a means to revalue a category of workers who range far down the labor queue. Moralization mediates the tension between the normative societal goal of inclusion for disabled people and the freedom of employers to select the most “productive” workers. Drawing on the theoretical approach of the Economics of Convention the chapter analyzes the valuation frames proposed by economic and welfare state actors in political debates over the establishment of the Swiss disability insurance and the role of employers regarding occupational integration. A core concept used in negotiations of the value of disabled labor in the public arena and within individual businesses is the “social responsibility” of employers. Historically, employers’ associations successfully promoted the liberal principle of voluntary responsibility to prevent state interference in the labor market. In contrast, disability insurance argues predominantly within the market and the industrial convention to “sell” its clientele in the context of employer campaigns and case-related interactions with employers. Only recently, both sides started to reframe the employment of disabled people as a win–win affair, which would reconcile economic self-interest and the common good.","PeriodicalId":180121,"journal":{"name":"The Contested Moralities of Markets","volume":"166 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Contested Moralities of Markets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20190000063013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As a “fictitious commodity” (Polanyi), that cannot be separated from the human being who is its owner, labor has a special moral significance. However, this moral quality is not a given but must be asserted in struggles over the value of labor. With the example of disabled workers in Switzerland, this chapter examines the moralization of labor as a means to revalue a category of workers who range far down the labor queue. Moralization mediates the tension between the normative societal goal of inclusion for disabled people and the freedom of employers to select the most “productive” workers. Drawing on the theoretical approach of the Economics of Convention the chapter analyzes the valuation frames proposed by economic and welfare state actors in political debates over the establishment of the Swiss disability insurance and the role of employers regarding occupational integration. A core concept used in negotiations of the value of disabled labor in the public arena and within individual businesses is the “social responsibility” of employers. Historically, employers’ associations successfully promoted the liberal principle of voluntary responsibility to prevent state interference in the labor market. In contrast, disability insurance argues predominantly within the market and the industrial convention to “sell” its clientele in the context of employer campaigns and case-related interactions with employers. Only recently, both sides started to reframe the employment of disabled people as a win–win affair, which would reconcile economic self-interest and the common good.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
劳动的道德化:确立雇主对残疾工人的社会责任
劳动作为一种“虚拟商品”(波兰尼),与作为它的主人的人是分不开的,因此具有特殊的道德意义。然而,这种道德品质不是给定的,而是必须在关于劳动价值的斗争中坚持的。以瑞士的残疾工人为例,本章考察了劳动的道德化,作为一种重新评估劳动队列中很远的一类工人的手段。道德化调解了包容残疾人的规范社会目标与雇主选择最“高效”工人的自由之间的紧张关系。根据公约经济学的理论方法,本章分析了经济和福利国家行为者在关于建立瑞士残疾保险和雇主在职业融合方面的作用的政治辩论中提出的估值框架。在公共领域和个体企业中,残疾劳动力价值谈判的一个核心概念是雇主的“社会责任”。从历史上看,雇主协会成功地推动了自愿责任的自由原则,以防止国家干预劳动力市场。相比之下,残疾保险主要在市场和行业惯例中主张,在雇主活动和与雇主的案例相关互动的背景下“出售”其客户。直到最近,双方才开始将残疾人就业重新定义为一件双赢的事情,这将协调经济自身利益和共同利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Moralization of Labor: Establishing the Social Responsibility of Employers for Disabled Workers Moral Struggles in and Around Markets Prelims Activists as Moral Entrepreneurs: How Shareholder Activists Brought Active Ownership To Switzerland Contested Markets: Morality, Market Devices, and Vulnerable Populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1