Practical evaluation of several cone beam orbits for SPECT

S. Manglos, B.D. Smith
{"title":"Practical evaluation of several cone beam orbits for SPECT","authors":"S. Manglos, B.D. Smith","doi":"10.1109/NSSMIC.1992.301030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several alternative orbits have been suggested for cone beam SPECT (single photon emission computed tomography) since the standard circular orbit provides insufficient sampling. The authors used a computer simulation to evaluate the practicality of several orbits using the following criteria: spatial resolution, sensitivity, elimination of truncation, and theoretical sufficiency of the acquired data. All orbits were evaluated for brain imaging with a realistic human model. The results indicate that the simple transverse circular orbit has high sensitivity and resolution, but of course the acquired data are insufficient. Modest improvement in resolution was obtained with a contoured transverse plane orbit. A single straight line orbit was inadequate. Three orbits, each composed of two noncoplanar curves, satisfied the sufficiency condition, and thus should produce more accurate reconstructions. Their resolution was similar to the circle, but the sensitivity was reduced by 15-30%. None of the orbits studied was as good as the transverse plane orbits (circle and contoured) in both resolution and sensitivity.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":447239,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Conference on Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging","volume":"2 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Conference on Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.1992.301030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Several alternative orbits have been suggested for cone beam SPECT (single photon emission computed tomography) since the standard circular orbit provides insufficient sampling. The authors used a computer simulation to evaluate the practicality of several orbits using the following criteria: spatial resolution, sensitivity, elimination of truncation, and theoretical sufficiency of the acquired data. All orbits were evaluated for brain imaging with a realistic human model. The results indicate that the simple transverse circular orbit has high sensitivity and resolution, but of course the acquired data are insufficient. Modest improvement in resolution was obtained with a contoured transverse plane orbit. A single straight line orbit was inadequate. Three orbits, each composed of two noncoplanar curves, satisfied the sufficiency condition, and thus should produce more accurate reconstructions. Their resolution was similar to the circle, but the sensitivity was reduced by 15-30%. None of the orbits studied was as good as the transverse plane orbits (circle and contoured) in both resolution and sensitivity.<>
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SPECT几种锥束轨道的实用评价
由于标准的圆形轨道不能提供足够的采样,锥束SPECT(单光子发射计算机断层扫描)的几种替代轨道已经被提出。作者使用计算机模拟来评估几种轨道的实用性,使用以下标准:空间分辨率,灵敏度,消除截断,以及所获取数据的理论充分性。所有的轨道都用真实的人体模型进行了脑成像评估。结果表明,简单横圆轨道具有较高的灵敏度和分辨率,但采集到的数据不足。采用等高线横向平面轨道,分辨率略有提高。单一的直线轨道是不够的。由两条非共面曲线组成的三个轨道满足充分性条件,因此应该产生更精确的重建。它们的分辨率与圆相似,但灵敏度降低了15-30%。所研究的轨道在分辨率和灵敏度上都不如横向平面轨道(圆形和等高线)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Results in online data processing in the data acquisition system of the ALEPH TPC Practical evaluation of several cone beam orbits for SPECT Model based scatter correction in three dimensions (positron emission tomography) Macintosh software for simulating resolution and scatter effects in PET Testing fast ADC's at sample rates between 20 and 140 MSPS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1