A technological profiling of lexical verbs: A contrastive corpus-based analysis of L1 and L2 learner writing: Implications towards second language learning and teaching

Noorzan Mohd Noor, Shazila Abdullah
{"title":"A technological profiling of lexical verbs: A contrastive corpus-based analysis of L1 and L2 learner writing: Implications towards second language learning and teaching","authors":"Noorzan Mohd Noor, Shazila Abdullah","doi":"10.1109/CHUSER.2012.6504310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing is often perceived as a very difficult skill for second language learners as compared to other language skills. Ineffective use or lack of vocabulary items often sets the L2 learners apart from native L1 learners. Not only should learners have a large repertoire of vocabulary to improve their writing quality, they also must know how to use the words correctly in order to assist them in achieving communicative competence. The words used will form sentences and it is the verbs that form the main structure of a sentence. Lexical verbs often pose problems to learners as they appear in many different forms which are dependent on tense and aspect system in English. To date, very few studies have done a lexical profile that highlights on the use of lexical verbs by Malay ESL learners. Since a lexical profile of a written learner language enables a researcher to look in depth into the actual use of language and identify usage problems, this paper reports on an investigation of salient features of the use of lexical verbs in two learner corpora. For this purpose, a contrastive analysis was done between Written English Corpus of Malay ESL Learners (WECMEL), a non-native learner corpus, and Learner Corpus of Native English Essays (LOCNESS). WECMEL comprises a collection of argumentative essays written by pre-degree university students whose first language is Malay; LOCNESS, on the other hand, consists of argumentative essays written by native speaker learners. The findings of this comparative analysis suggest pedagogical implications towards the learning and teaching of grammar, in particular the lexical verbs.","PeriodicalId":444674,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE Colloquium on Humanities, Science and Engineering (CHUSER)","volume":"28 11-12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE Colloquium on Humanities, Science and Engineering (CHUSER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CHUSER.2012.6504310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Writing is often perceived as a very difficult skill for second language learners as compared to other language skills. Ineffective use or lack of vocabulary items often sets the L2 learners apart from native L1 learners. Not only should learners have a large repertoire of vocabulary to improve their writing quality, they also must know how to use the words correctly in order to assist them in achieving communicative competence. The words used will form sentences and it is the verbs that form the main structure of a sentence. Lexical verbs often pose problems to learners as they appear in many different forms which are dependent on tense and aspect system in English. To date, very few studies have done a lexical profile that highlights on the use of lexical verbs by Malay ESL learners. Since a lexical profile of a written learner language enables a researcher to look in depth into the actual use of language and identify usage problems, this paper reports on an investigation of salient features of the use of lexical verbs in two learner corpora. For this purpose, a contrastive analysis was done between Written English Corpus of Malay ESL Learners (WECMEL), a non-native learner corpus, and Learner Corpus of Native English Essays (LOCNESS). WECMEL comprises a collection of argumentative essays written by pre-degree university students whose first language is Malay; LOCNESS, on the other hand, consists of argumentative essays written by native speaker learners. The findings of this comparative analysis suggest pedagogical implications towards the learning and teaching of grammar, in particular the lexical verbs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
词汇动词的技术分析:基于对比语料库的第一语言和第二语言学习者写作分析:对第二语言学习和教学的启示
与其他语言技能相比,写作通常被认为是第二语言学习者非常困难的技能。词汇的无效使用或缺乏经常使第二语言学习者与母语学习者区别开来。学习者不仅要掌握大量的词汇来提高他们的写作质量,他们还必须知道如何正确地使用单词,以帮助他们获得交际能力。所使用的单词构成句子,动词构成句子的主要结构。词汇动词在英语中以多种不同的形式出现,依赖于时态和时态系统,这给学习者带来了很多问题。迄今为止,很少有研究做了一个词汇概况,强调马来语ESL学习者对词汇动词的使用。由于书面学习者语言的词汇概况使研究者能够深入研究语言的实际使用并发现使用问题,因此本文报告了对两个学习者语料库中词汇动词使用的显著特征的调查。为此,我们对马来语ESL学习者(WECMEL)的书面英语语料库(非母语学习者语料库)和母语英语论文学习者语料库(LOCNESS)进行了对比分析。WECMEL包括由第一语言为马来语的大学预科学生撰写的议论文集;另一方面,LOCNESS由以英语为母语的学习者撰写的议论文组成。这一比较分析的结果表明,对语法的学习和教学,特别是词汇动词的教学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relationship between macroeconomic variables and Malaysia available Shariah Indices Static hole error analysis within laminar and turbulent regime using CFD approach Utilization of quality assurance tools in ensuring high healthcare professionals' performance in a public hospital in Malaysia A technological profiling of lexical verbs: A contrastive corpus-based analysis of L1 and L2 learner writing: Implications towards second language learning and teaching Negotiating development as an alternative mechanism in fostering sustainable development in Malaysia: A legal and planning issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1