Turbulence in Efforts at Curriculum Renewal for Educational Equity: A Critical Analysis of a Primary Curriculum Review Exercise in Trinidad and Tobago

Freddy James, J. George
{"title":"Turbulence in Efforts at Curriculum Renewal for Educational Equity: A Critical Analysis of a Primary Curriculum Review Exercise in Trinidad and Tobago","authors":"Freddy James, J. George","doi":"10.1108/978-1-78754-675-220181010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nThis chapter reports on research work which was a component of an independent review of the primary school curriculum renewal exercise that was commissioned by the Ministry of Education in Trinidad and Tobago and executed during 2012–2013. It examines how agencies functioned to engender educational change through education governance systems in the process of revising the curriculum. Turbulence Theory (Gross, 2014) was the tool used to explore the interactions among agencies. The research shows that turbulence occurred at various stages and that the outcome of interactions among the agencies that were in pursuit of educational change and equity was largely dependent on the extent of the turbulence and how it was managed. For example, the local Curriculum Planning Team (CPT) was able to learn from external consultants while firmly maintaining that they were the ones who had a deep understanding of the local context and should therefore have a major say in what was included in the curriculum. However, the CPT could do little to offset the severe turbulence caused when the political directorate mandated that there should be full-scale implementation of the revised curriculum without the benefit of a pilot. The role of socio-political contextual factors in the curriculum development process is highlighted.","PeriodicalId":314970,"journal":{"name":"Turbulence, Empowerment and Marginalisation in International Education Governance Systems","volume":"46 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turbulence, Empowerment and Marginalisation in International Education Governance Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78754-675-220181010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract This chapter reports on research work which was a component of an independent review of the primary school curriculum renewal exercise that was commissioned by the Ministry of Education in Trinidad and Tobago and executed during 2012–2013. It examines how agencies functioned to engender educational change through education governance systems in the process of revising the curriculum. Turbulence Theory (Gross, 2014) was the tool used to explore the interactions among agencies. The research shows that turbulence occurred at various stages and that the outcome of interactions among the agencies that were in pursuit of educational change and equity was largely dependent on the extent of the turbulence and how it was managed. For example, the local Curriculum Planning Team (CPT) was able to learn from external consultants while firmly maintaining that they were the ones who had a deep understanding of the local context and should therefore have a major say in what was included in the curriculum. However, the CPT could do little to offset the severe turbulence caused when the political directorate mandated that there should be full-scale implementation of the revised curriculum without the benefit of a pilot. The role of socio-political contextual factors in the curriculum development process is highlighted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为教育公平而更新课程努力中的动荡:对特立尼达和多巴哥小学课程审查工作的批判性分析
本章报告了研究工作,该工作是特立尼达和多巴哥教育部委托并于2012-2013年执行的小学课程更新工作的独立审查的组成部分。它考察了机构在修订课程的过程中如何通过教育治理系统来实现教育变革。湍流理论(Gross, 2014)是用来探索机构之间相互作用的工具。研究表明,动荡发生在不同的阶段,追求教育变革和公平的机构之间相互作用的结果在很大程度上取决于动荡的程度以及如何管理它。例如,当地课程规划小组(CPT)能够向外部顾问学习,同时坚定地认为他们是对当地情况有深刻理解的人,因此应该对课程内容有主要的发言权。然而,当政治理事会要求在没有试点的情况下全面实施修订后的课程时,防范酷刑委员会几乎无法抵消所造成的严重动荡。强调了社会政治背景因素在课程发展过程中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Turbulence in Efforts at Curriculum Renewal for Educational Equity: A Critical Analysis of a Primary Curriculum Review Exercise in Trinidad and Tobago The Turbulence Black, Asian, Minority Ethnicity Chief Executive Officers of Small, Medium and Empty MATs Face in England’s Education System; the Agency Index Prelims Turbulence, Empowerment, and Marginalised Groups: A comparative analysis of five International Education Governance Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1