Impact of time management program on stress and coping strategies adopted by nursing students with regard to academic performance

Juby Mary Chacko, A. Varghese, N. Rajesh
{"title":"Impact of time management program on stress and coping strategies adopted by nursing students with regard to academic performance","authors":"Juby Mary Chacko, A. Varghese, N. Rajesh","doi":"10.18231/j.ijpns.2023.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Because nurses must interact with a variety of people in a variety of situations, nursing is an emotionally taxing and extremely stressful vocation on various times of the day and circumstances. To look at the coping mechanisms nursing students use to deal with the stress of their studies and clinicals. High levels of stress can have negative effects on learning, coping, academic performance, and retention in nursing students as well as memory, focus, and problem-solving skills. There have been no studies explicitly involving nursing students, but college students with higher levels of learnt resourcefulness tend to be more motivated, self-assured, and academically persistent.At a chosen health science university in Mangalore, 320 undergraduate students participated in a descriptive-correlative study. Utilizing disproportionate stratified sampling approaches, the samples were chosen. Researcher used various tool such as time management questionnaire, Student Nurse Stress Index and self-prepared tool for academic performance. The mean post-test stress score (65.79±8.79) ranging from 31 to 86 was lower than the mean pre-test stress score (70.77±9.01) ranging from 36 to 95. The mean time management during post-test (110.88±15.08) was higher than that of pre-test (98.14±11.46). The mean stress score during post-test (65.79 ± 8.79) was lower than that of pre-test (70.75±9.02). The mean academic performance score during post-test (26.52±4.84) was higher than that of pre-test (22.79±3.90). Majority of samples (71.6%) were having good level of time management followed by 27.5% having average and 0.9% having excellent time management score during pre-test. Where as in post-test, most of the samples had (83.8%) good time management score followed by 8.8 % having excellent and 7.5 % having average The results also showed that 65.6% were having moderate level of stress followed by 31.9% having high and 2.5 % having low stress level, where as in post-test, most of the samples had (81.9%) moderate stress score followed by 13.1 % having high and 5% having low stress score. The data regarding academic performance states that 73.4% were having average academic performance score followed by 24.7 % having poor and 1.9% having good academic performance. Where as in post-test, majority of the samples had (64.1%) average academic performance score followed by 23.4 % having good and 12.5 % having poor academic performance score.This study reveals that the stress load is directly related to poor academic performances and a good strategy adaptation will definitely bring a fruitful result in nursing students for their carrier development.","PeriodicalId":391212,"journal":{"name":"IP Journal of Paediatrics and Nursing Science","volume":"2010 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP Journal of Paediatrics and Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpns.2023.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because nurses must interact with a variety of people in a variety of situations, nursing is an emotionally taxing and extremely stressful vocation on various times of the day and circumstances. To look at the coping mechanisms nursing students use to deal with the stress of their studies and clinicals. High levels of stress can have negative effects on learning, coping, academic performance, and retention in nursing students as well as memory, focus, and problem-solving skills. There have been no studies explicitly involving nursing students, but college students with higher levels of learnt resourcefulness tend to be more motivated, self-assured, and academically persistent.At a chosen health science university in Mangalore, 320 undergraduate students participated in a descriptive-correlative study. Utilizing disproportionate stratified sampling approaches, the samples were chosen. Researcher used various tool such as time management questionnaire, Student Nurse Stress Index and self-prepared tool for academic performance. The mean post-test stress score (65.79±8.79) ranging from 31 to 86 was lower than the mean pre-test stress score (70.77±9.01) ranging from 36 to 95. The mean time management during post-test (110.88±15.08) was higher than that of pre-test (98.14±11.46). The mean stress score during post-test (65.79 ± 8.79) was lower than that of pre-test (70.75±9.02). The mean academic performance score during post-test (26.52±4.84) was higher than that of pre-test (22.79±3.90). Majority of samples (71.6%) were having good level of time management followed by 27.5% having average and 0.9% having excellent time management score during pre-test. Where as in post-test, most of the samples had (83.8%) good time management score followed by 8.8 % having excellent and 7.5 % having average The results also showed that 65.6% were having moderate level of stress followed by 31.9% having high and 2.5 % having low stress level, where as in post-test, most of the samples had (81.9%) moderate stress score followed by 13.1 % having high and 5% having low stress score. The data regarding academic performance states that 73.4% were having average academic performance score followed by 24.7 % having poor and 1.9% having good academic performance. Where as in post-test, majority of the samples had (64.1%) average academic performance score followed by 23.4 % having good and 12.5 % having poor academic performance score.This study reveals that the stress load is directly related to poor academic performances and a good strategy adaptation will definitely bring a fruitful result in nursing students for their carrier development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
时间管理计划对护生学业成绩压力及应对策略的影响
因为护士必须在各种情况下与各种各样的人打交道,所以在一天中的不同时间和情况下,护理是一项耗费情感和压力极大的职业。观察护生在处理学习和临床压力时的应对机制。高水平的压力会对护理学生的学习、应对、学习成绩、记忆力、注意力和解决问题的能力产生负面影响。目前还没有明确涉及护理专业学生的研究,但具有更高水平习得机智的大学生往往更有动力、更自信、更坚持学习。在芒格洛尔选定的一所健康科学大学,320名本科生参加了描述性相关研究。采用不成比例分层抽样方法,选择样本。研究人员使用了各种工具,如时间管理问卷,学生护士压力指数和自备的学业成绩工具。测试后压力得分(65.79±8.79)(31 ~ 86)低于测试前压力得分(70.77±9.01)(36 ~ 95)。测试后的平均时间管理水平(110.88±15.08)高于测试前(98.14±11.46)。测后平均应激评分(65.79±8.79)低于测前平均应激评分(70.75±9.02)。测试后平均学业成绩得分(26.52±4.84)高于测试前(22.79±3.90)。大多数样本(71.6%)的时间管理水平良好,27.5%的样本时间管理水平一般,0.9%的样本时间管理水平优异。在后测中,大多数样本的时间管理得分为良好(83.8%),其次是优秀(8.8%)和平均(7.5%)。结果还显示,65.6%的样本有中等水平的压力,31.9%的样本有高压力,2.5%的样本有低压力,而在后测中,大多数样本的压力得分为中等(81.9%),其次是高压力,13.1%的样本有高压力,5%的样本有低压力。学业成绩方面的数据显示,73.4%的学生成绩一般,其次是24.7%的学生成绩差,1.9%的学生成绩好。而在测试后,大部分样本的学习成绩为平均(64.1%),其次是23.4%的学习成绩良好和12.5%的学习成绩较差。本研究表明,压力负荷与学习成绩差有直接关系,良好的策略适应必将为护生的载体发展带来丰硕的成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maternal directed interventions of preterm newborn on strengthening mother- newborn interaction in NICU: A systematic review Overlap of histological features of pigmented purpuric dermatosis and kaposi sarcoma – pseudo kaposi sarcoma A riddle of ‘Alice in wonderland pattern in children’- A rare neurological disorder A comparative study to assess the effectiveness of structured teaching program on knowledge regarding prevention of pressure ulcers among BSc nursing 2 year and BSc nursing 3 year students in selected nursing colleges of Patiala, Punjab Perception and attitude of nursing faculties regarding innovative teaching strategies in nursing education: A descriptive study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1