{"title":"COMPARATIVE STUDY ON ANALYSIS OF TELECOM TOWER USING INDIA AND AMERICAN STANDARDS","authors":"Srinivas Tanuku, K. Rao, B. P. Rangarao","doi":"10.47412/dwhy3671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Self-supporting lattice tower are being effective structural system by considering simple, light weight, easy fabrication and installation for supporting telecom equipment at elevated heights. With increase in demand of lattice towers, a critical review on approach for analysis is highly essential to ensure reliable and safe structures. In this paper, a comparative study is taken up on methodologies followed in both national standards (India, America) for assessment of wind loads on bare tower, linear accessories, discrete accessories along with design resistance of members and connections for Two different configurations – Square angular tower, Triangular Hybrid Tower. From the detailed analysis, it is concluded that, American standard (ANSI/TIA-222H) is using Ultimate windspeed for calculation of wind loads based on risk category of structure along with strength reduction factors based on criticality of components compared to Indian Standards (IS 875(Part 3)-2015, IS 802) which resulted lesser wind load on structure i.e., 30% in Square Tower (Oblique wind direction) and 23% in Triangular Hybrid Tower using ANSI/TIA-222H. Also, no major difference observed for calculation of member capacity and connection. Therefore, it is concluded that Tower weights approximately reduces by 10-15% based on Tower configuration using ANSI/TIA-222H compared to Indian Standards","PeriodicalId":206492,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering & Technology (IConETech-2020)","volume":"45 14","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering & Technology (IConETech-2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47412/dwhy3671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Self-supporting lattice tower are being effective structural system by considering simple, light weight, easy fabrication and installation for supporting telecom equipment at elevated heights. With increase in demand of lattice towers, a critical review on approach for analysis is highly essential to ensure reliable and safe structures. In this paper, a comparative study is taken up on methodologies followed in both national standards (India, America) for assessment of wind loads on bare tower, linear accessories, discrete accessories along with design resistance of members and connections for Two different configurations – Square angular tower, Triangular Hybrid Tower. From the detailed analysis, it is concluded that, American standard (ANSI/TIA-222H) is using Ultimate windspeed for calculation of wind loads based on risk category of structure along with strength reduction factors based on criticality of components compared to Indian Standards (IS 875(Part 3)-2015, IS 802) which resulted lesser wind load on structure i.e., 30% in Square Tower (Oblique wind direction) and 23% in Triangular Hybrid Tower using ANSI/TIA-222H. Also, no major difference observed for calculation of member capacity and connection. Therefore, it is concluded that Tower weights approximately reduces by 10-15% based on Tower configuration using ANSI/TIA-222H compared to Indian Standards
自支撑格塔结构简单、重量轻、易于制作和安装,是支撑高空通信设备的有效结构体系。随着格构塔结构需求的不断增加,对格构塔结构的分析方法进行严格的审查对于保证格构塔结构的可靠性和安全性至关重要。在本文中,比较研究了两国标准(印度,美国)所遵循的方法,用于评估裸塔,线性附件,离散附件以及两种不同配置-方形角塔,三角形混合塔的构件和连接的设计阻力。从详细分析中可以得出结论,与印度标准(is 875(Part 3)-2015, is 802)相比,美国标准(ANSI/TIA-222H)使用极限风速来计算基于结构风险类别的风荷载以及基于组件临界性的强度折减系数,因此使用ANSI/TIA-222H的方形塔(斜风向)和三角形混合塔的风荷载较小,分别为30%和23%。此外,在计算成员容量和连接方面也没有观察到重大差异。因此,与印度标准相比,基于使用ANSI/TIA-222H的塔架配置,塔架重量大约减少了10-15%