COMPARATIVE STUDY ON ANALYSIS OF TELECOM TOWER USING INDIA AND AMERICAN STANDARDS

Srinivas Tanuku, K. Rao, B. P. Rangarao
{"title":"COMPARATIVE STUDY ON ANALYSIS OF TELECOM TOWER USING INDIA AND AMERICAN STANDARDS","authors":"Srinivas Tanuku, K. Rao, B. P. Rangarao","doi":"10.47412/dwhy3671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Self-supporting lattice tower are being effective structural system by considering simple, light weight, easy fabrication and installation for supporting telecom equipment at elevated heights. With increase in demand of lattice towers, a critical review on approach for analysis is highly essential to ensure reliable and safe structures. In this paper, a comparative study is taken up on methodologies followed in both national standards (India, America) for assessment of wind loads on bare tower, linear accessories, discrete accessories along with design resistance of members and connections for Two different configurations – Square angular tower, Triangular Hybrid Tower. From the detailed analysis, it is concluded that, American standard (ANSI/TIA-222H) is using Ultimate windspeed for calculation of wind loads based on risk category of structure along with strength reduction factors based on criticality of components compared to Indian Standards (IS 875(Part 3)-2015, IS 802) which resulted lesser wind load on structure i.e., 30% in Square Tower (Oblique wind direction) and 23% in Triangular Hybrid Tower using ANSI/TIA-222H. Also, no major difference observed for calculation of member capacity and connection. Therefore, it is concluded that Tower weights approximately reduces by 10-15% based on Tower configuration using ANSI/TIA-222H compared to Indian Standards","PeriodicalId":206492,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering & Technology (IConETech-2020)","volume":"45 14","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering & Technology (IConETech-2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47412/dwhy3671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-supporting lattice tower are being effective structural system by considering simple, light weight, easy fabrication and installation for supporting telecom equipment at elevated heights. With increase in demand of lattice towers, a critical review on approach for analysis is highly essential to ensure reliable and safe structures. In this paper, a comparative study is taken up on methodologies followed in both national standards (India, America) for assessment of wind loads on bare tower, linear accessories, discrete accessories along with design resistance of members and connections for Two different configurations – Square angular tower, Triangular Hybrid Tower. From the detailed analysis, it is concluded that, American standard (ANSI/TIA-222H) is using Ultimate windspeed for calculation of wind loads based on risk category of structure along with strength reduction factors based on criticality of components compared to Indian Standards (IS 875(Part 3)-2015, IS 802) which resulted lesser wind load on structure i.e., 30% in Square Tower (Oblique wind direction) and 23% in Triangular Hybrid Tower using ANSI/TIA-222H. Also, no major difference observed for calculation of member capacity and connection. Therefore, it is concluded that Tower weights approximately reduces by 10-15% based on Tower configuration using ANSI/TIA-222H compared to Indian Standards
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度与美国电信铁塔标准分析的比较研究
自支撑格塔结构简单、重量轻、易于制作和安装,是支撑高空通信设备的有效结构体系。随着格构塔结构需求的不断增加,对格构塔结构的分析方法进行严格的审查对于保证格构塔结构的可靠性和安全性至关重要。在本文中,比较研究了两国标准(印度,美国)所遵循的方法,用于评估裸塔,线性附件,离散附件以及两种不同配置-方形角塔,三角形混合塔的构件和连接的设计阻力。从详细分析中可以得出结论,与印度标准(is 875(Part 3)-2015, is 802)相比,美国标准(ANSI/TIA-222H)使用极限风速来计算基于结构风险类别的风荷载以及基于组件临界性的强度折减系数,因此使用ANSI/TIA-222H的方形塔(斜风向)和三角形混合塔的风荷载较小,分别为30%和23%。此外,在计算成员容量和连接方面也没有观察到重大差异。因此,与印度标准相比,基于使用ANSI/TIA-222H的塔架配置,塔架重量大约减少了10-15%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON ANALYSIS OF TELECOM TOWER USING INDIA AND AMERICAN STANDARDS OPTIMISATION OF THE SUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTION OF VETIVER ROOTS INDUSTRIAL RECYCLE TOWARDS ZERO DISCHARGE - Alumina Refinery Case Study UNSTEADY HYDROMAGNETIC COUETTE FLOW UNDER AN OSCILLATING PRESSURE GRADIENT AND UNIFORM SUCTION AND INJECTION EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS AND RISK ASSESSMENT REPORTS FOR BUILDING SERVICES INSTALLATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1