A Novel Prediction Analysing the False Acceptance Rate and False Rejection Rate using CNN Model to Improve the Accuracy for Iris Recognition System for Biometric Security in Clouds Comparing with Traditional Inception Model

Noor Basha Shaik Riyaz, V. Parthipan
{"title":"A Novel Prediction Analysing the False Acceptance Rate and False Rejection Rate using CNN Model to Improve the Accuracy for Iris Recognition System for Biometric Security in Clouds Comparing with Traditional Inception Model","authors":"Noor Basha Shaik Riyaz, V. Parthipan","doi":"10.1109/ICAC3N56670.2022.10074026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main motivation of the study is to improve the Novel Prediction of accuracy using the Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) model system for iris recognition biometric security in clouds and comparing with Traditional inception models (TIM). Accuracy to perform two groups CNN model and Traditional Inception Models (N=10) to calculate and find the comparison value of accuracy. G power 80% threshold 0.05%, 95% confidence interval mean and standard deviation The independent sample T-test was used Convolutional Neural Networks and TIM. CNN (92%) performs better than TIM (60%). There is a statistically relevant disparity between the CNN and TIM transform based on comparison ratio data is 0.048 (p<0.05). The result shows the proposed CNN algorithm has the better accuracy compared to TIM algorithm.","PeriodicalId":342573,"journal":{"name":"2022 4th International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICAC3N)","volume":"194 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 4th International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICAC3N)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAC3N56670.2022.10074026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main motivation of the study is to improve the Novel Prediction of accuracy using the Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) model system for iris recognition biometric security in clouds and comparing with Traditional inception models (TIM). Accuracy to perform two groups CNN model and Traditional Inception Models (N=10) to calculate and find the comparison value of accuracy. G power 80% threshold 0.05%, 95% confidence interval mean and standard deviation The independent sample T-test was used Convolutional Neural Networks and TIM. CNN (92%) performs better than TIM (60%). There is a statistically relevant disparity between the CNN and TIM transform based on comparison ratio data is 0.048 (p<0.05). The result shows the proposed CNN algorithm has the better accuracy compared to TIM algorithm.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用CNN模型分析虹膜识别系统在云环境下的误接受率和误拒率,与传统盗梦模型相比,提高了虹膜识别系统的准确率
本研究的主要目的是利用卷积神经网络(CNN)模型系统提高虹膜识别生物特征安全性的新型预测精度,并与传统的初始模型(TIM)进行比较。对准确率进行两组CNN模型和传统Inception模型(N=10)的计算,找到准确率的比较值。G功率80%阈值0.05%,95%置信区间均值和标准差采用卷积神经网络和TIM进行独立样本t检验。CNN(92%)的表现好于TIM(60%)。基于比较比数据的CNN和TIM变换之间存在统计学上的相关差异为0.048 (p<0.05)。结果表明,与TIM算法相比,本文提出的CNN算法具有更好的准确率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Taxonomy on Man-in-the-Middle Attack in IoT Network An Ingenious Method to Detect COVID in X-Ray Images Using Machine Learning Techniques Inflated 3D Convolution Network for Detecting Anomalies in Surveillance Videos A Novel Prediction Analysing the False Acceptance Rate and False Rejection Rate using CNN Model to Improve the Accuracy for Iris Recognition System for Biometric Security in Clouds Comparing with Traditional Inception Model A Comparative Analysis On Machine Learning Algorithm for Score Prediction and Proposal of Enhanced Naïve Bayes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1