The Linville Creek Bridge: A Case Study of Design Thinking in Structural Engineering

Andrew J. Sklavounos, Daniel I. Castaneda
{"title":"The Linville Creek Bridge: A Case Study of Design Thinking in Structural Engineering","authors":"Andrew J. Sklavounos, Daniel I. Castaneda","doi":"10.1109/sieds55548.2022.9799298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Industrial Revolution in the 19th Century transformed the United States from a largely agrarian country to an industrialized nation. Many technical solutions met technical needs, which contributed to changing qualities of life for the better and worse. As innovative technologies were adopted to enhance human comforts, typical technology practices of the time overlooked impacts to the environment and to human health. Widespread areas of air and water became polluted, and dangerous working conditions were commonplace. Engineers participated in this revolution, as well, by creating new infrastructure to move manufactured goods. While engineering solutions were similarly technical in nature, there exist rare examples in the 19th Century where civil and structural engineering followed an atypical, empathetic approach to meet the needs of people. The design and construction of the Linville Creek Bridge in 1898 at Broadway, Virginia, for example, is a unique case study that structural engineers and engineers-in-training will be interested to learn about due to the project's incorporation of community input in its technical design and construction. This project is an early example of a bridge's design and siting being informed by the community in which it is located. This paper presents an argument that the design and construction of this 19th Century bridge followed steps that are similar to the modern-era human-centered Design Thinking (DT) process now used in the 21st Century. We highlight how civic leaders and engineers in the town of Broadway used the community's input to empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test a bridge that would meet the needs of the community. Thus, even though the DT process did not exist at the time, the specific steps undertaken helped to create and design a unique truss structure that fit the desires and needs of the community and contributed toward the truss bridge gaining sociocultural value over time, now recognized as a historic landmark. This case study exploration of the DT steps being used by structural engineers in the 19th Century is a valuable lesson for structural engineers of the 21st Century to gain insight into how structural engineering has been conducted in the past and at present to see how the incorporation of human dimensions of engineering problem solving has grown tremendously. The sociotechnical success of the Linville Creek Bridge shows how it is valuable to meet the needs of the people in structural engineering design and construction to create successful structures that satisfy the needs of communities for decades to come.","PeriodicalId":286724,"journal":{"name":"2022 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/sieds55548.2022.9799298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Industrial Revolution in the 19th Century transformed the United States from a largely agrarian country to an industrialized nation. Many technical solutions met technical needs, which contributed to changing qualities of life for the better and worse. As innovative technologies were adopted to enhance human comforts, typical technology practices of the time overlooked impacts to the environment and to human health. Widespread areas of air and water became polluted, and dangerous working conditions were commonplace. Engineers participated in this revolution, as well, by creating new infrastructure to move manufactured goods. While engineering solutions were similarly technical in nature, there exist rare examples in the 19th Century where civil and structural engineering followed an atypical, empathetic approach to meet the needs of people. The design and construction of the Linville Creek Bridge in 1898 at Broadway, Virginia, for example, is a unique case study that structural engineers and engineers-in-training will be interested to learn about due to the project's incorporation of community input in its technical design and construction. This project is an early example of a bridge's design and siting being informed by the community in which it is located. This paper presents an argument that the design and construction of this 19th Century bridge followed steps that are similar to the modern-era human-centered Design Thinking (DT) process now used in the 21st Century. We highlight how civic leaders and engineers in the town of Broadway used the community's input to empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test a bridge that would meet the needs of the community. Thus, even though the DT process did not exist at the time, the specific steps undertaken helped to create and design a unique truss structure that fit the desires and needs of the community and contributed toward the truss bridge gaining sociocultural value over time, now recognized as a historic landmark. This case study exploration of the DT steps being used by structural engineers in the 19th Century is a valuable lesson for structural engineers of the 21st Century to gain insight into how structural engineering has been conducted in the past and at present to see how the incorporation of human dimensions of engineering problem solving has grown tremendously. The sociotechnical success of the Linville Creek Bridge shows how it is valuable to meet the needs of the people in structural engineering design and construction to create successful structures that satisfy the needs of communities for decades to come.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
林维尔河大桥:结构工程设计思维的个案研究
19世纪的工业革命使美国从一个以农业为主的国家转变为一个工业化国家。许多技术解决方案满足了技术需求,这有助于改变生活质量,或好或坏。由于采用创新技术来提高人类的舒适度,当时的典型技术做法忽视了对环境和人类健康的影响。大范围的空气和水被污染,危险的工作条件司空见惯。工程师们也参与了这场革命,他们创造了新的基础设施来运输制成品。虽然工程解决方案本质上是类似的技术,但在19世纪,土木和结构工程遵循非典型的、同理心的方法来满足人们的需求,这是罕见的例子。例如,1898年位于弗吉尼亚州百老汇的林维尔河大桥的设计和施工是一个独特的案例研究,结构工程师和在职工程师将有兴趣了解,因为该项目在技术设计和施工中纳入了社区的投入。这个项目是一个早期的桥梁设计和选址的例子,它是由它所在的社区告知的。本文提出的论点是,这座19世纪桥梁的设计和建造遵循的步骤类似于21世纪使用的现代以人为本的设计思维(DT)过程。我们强调了百老汇镇的公民领袖和工程师如何利用社区的意见来理解、定义、构思、原型和测试一座满足社区需求的桥梁。因此,尽管当时不存在DT过程,但所采取的具体步骤有助于创建和设计适合社区愿望和需求的独特桁架结构,并有助于桁架桥随着时间的推移获得社会文化价值,现在被公认为历史地标。本案例研究探索了19世纪结构工程师使用的DT步骤,对于21世纪的结构工程师来说,这是一个宝贵的经验,可以让他们深入了解过去的结构工程是如何进行的,以及现在如何将人类维度纳入工程问题解决的巨大增长。林维尔河大桥的社会技术成功表明,在结构工程设计和施工中,满足人们的需求,创造出满足未来几十年社区需求的成功结构是多么有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Linville Creek Bridge: A Case Study of Design Thinking in Structural Engineering Convergence Across Behavioral and Self-report Measures Evaluating Individuals' Trust in an Autonomous Golf Cart Investigating the Illicit Trade of Cultural Property with an Automated Data Pipeline Architecture Investigating Disinformation Through the Lens of Mass Media: A System Design Dynamic Coal Production Line: Plant Design and Analysis Tool
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1