Self-assessed confidence in EC-2000 outcomes: a study of gender and ethnicity differences across institutions

Magaly Moreno, M. Besterfield-Sacre, L. Shuman, H. Wolfe, C. Atman
{"title":"Self-assessed confidence in EC-2000 outcomes: a study of gender and ethnicity differences across institutions","authors":"Magaly Moreno, M. Besterfield-Sacre, L. Shuman, H. Wolfe, C. Atman","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2000.897524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the establishment of the challenging Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC-2000) accreditation guidelines, institutions must obtain a more informed understanding of students' underlying knowledge, skills, and attitudes as they begin, matriculate, and eventually complete their engineering studies. As engineering educators collect information about how students demonstrate achievement in the \"a-k\" outcomes, questions arise as to whether differences exist between student groups, specifically gender and ethnicity differences. Such differences may potentially affect a student's performance and persistence in engineering. Prior research indicates that engineering students' initial attitudes, along with gender and ethnicity, are linked to first term probation and retention in the freshman year. How they are linked to achievement of the EC-2000 outcomes is still an open question. At the University of Pittsburgh, we are investigating how confidence in the outcomes changes throughout a student's undergraduate engineering career and how these self-assessed outcomes correlate with other 'a-k' outcome metrics. As part of the larger study, the paper explores the issue of how confidence in the outcomes is influenced by gender and ethnicity factors at the freshman level. Using the Pittsburgh Freshman Engineering Attitude Post-Survey/sup TM/ and data from 16 US engineering schools, who took the questionnaire during the 1998-99 academic year, we have found a number of significant and consistent differences in the 11 outcomes with respect to student gender and ethnicity.","PeriodicalId":371740,"journal":{"name":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","volume":"45 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2000.897524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

With the establishment of the challenging Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC-2000) accreditation guidelines, institutions must obtain a more informed understanding of students' underlying knowledge, skills, and attitudes as they begin, matriculate, and eventually complete their engineering studies. As engineering educators collect information about how students demonstrate achievement in the "a-k" outcomes, questions arise as to whether differences exist between student groups, specifically gender and ethnicity differences. Such differences may potentially affect a student's performance and persistence in engineering. Prior research indicates that engineering students' initial attitudes, along with gender and ethnicity, are linked to first term probation and retention in the freshman year. How they are linked to achievement of the EC-2000 outcomes is still an open question. At the University of Pittsburgh, we are investigating how confidence in the outcomes changes throughout a student's undergraduate engineering career and how these self-assessed outcomes correlate with other 'a-k' outcome metrics. As part of the larger study, the paper explores the issue of how confidence in the outcomes is influenced by gender and ethnicity factors at the freshman level. Using the Pittsburgh Freshman Engineering Attitude Post-Survey/sup TM/ and data from 16 US engineering schools, who took the questionnaire during the 1998-99 academic year, we have found a number of significant and consistent differences in the 11 outcomes with respect to student gender and ethnicity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对EC-2000结果的自我评估信心:跨机构性别和种族差异的研究
随着具有挑战性的工程标准2000 (EC-2000)认证指南的建立,各院校必须在学生开始、入学和最终完成工程学习时,对学生的基本知识、技能和态度有更深入的了解。随着工程教育工作者收集有关学生如何在“a-k”成绩中表现出成就的信息,学生群体之间是否存在差异,特别是性别和种族差异的问题就出现了。这种差异可能会潜在地影响学生在工程方面的表现和坚持。先前的研究表明,工科学生最初的态度,以及性别和种族,与第一年的第一学期试用期和留校率有关。它们如何与欧共体-2000成果的实现联系起来,仍是一个悬而未决的问题。在匹兹堡大学(University of Pittsburgh),我们正在调查学生对结果的信心在整个本科工程职业生涯中是如何变化的,以及这些自我评估的结果如何与其他“a-k”结果指标相关联。作为更大规模研究的一部分,本文探讨了新生对结果的信心如何受到性别和种族因素的影响。利用匹兹堡大学新生工程态度调查(sup TM)和来自16所美国工程学院的数据,他们在1998-99学年接受了问卷调查,我们发现了11项结果中关于学生性别和种族的一些显著和一致的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Design TASC Engineering Design Competition: a ten-year perspective Concept questions for improved learning and outcome assessment in statics Different is good: barriers to retention for women in software engineering What are we really evaluating? Building the next generation of high performance computing researchers in engineering and science: the NCSA/ARL MSRC PET summer internship program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1