Russian Pro-Natalist Policy and Its Hidden Dilemma

Y. Latov, N. Latova
{"title":"Russian Pro-Natalist Policy and Its Hidden Dilemma","authors":"Y. Latov, N. Latova","doi":"10.31063/2073-6517/2021.18-3.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The demographic policy of the Russian government, which aims to ‘preserve and increase the people’, combines two qualitatively different approaches to understanding the problem of population decline. Most often, the emphasis is placed on stimulating fertility, although there is also an understanding that it is important to raise the quality of their upbringing and education. While the focus on increasing human capital is economically justified, the desire to increase the birth rate has no such justification. The theory of demographic transition proves that stimulating the birth rate is an erroneous goal. The ‘cash for babies’ policy applied in Russia is based on the conviction that children, even those born in poor and dysfunctional families, inevitably ‘pass’ through the education system and become qualified workers. On the basis of this stereotype, the system of pro-natalist incentives is built in such a way that, in accordance with the law of diminishing marginal utility, it creates stronger incentives for poorer families and is therefore actually aimed at increasing the birth rate primarily in the poor strata, having little effect on middle-class families. Meanwhile, modern theories of social capital and labor market signals prove the limited ability of schools and universities to play the role of social elevators. International studies (in particular, in the USA) shows that state benefits for children of poor and disadvantaged families contribute to the reproduction of a culture of poverty. Therefore, when the Russian authorities provide assistance primarily to low-income and single-parent families with children, they create problems for the future. The study proposes to replace the current policy based on the principle ‘more babies but cheaper’ with a policy aimed at middle-class families and based on the principle ‘less is more’. Thus, an orientation towards stimulating population growth is replaced by an orientation towards fostering human capital.","PeriodicalId":125794,"journal":{"name":"Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii","volume":"26 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2021.18-3.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The demographic policy of the Russian government, which aims to ‘preserve and increase the people’, combines two qualitatively different approaches to understanding the problem of population decline. Most often, the emphasis is placed on stimulating fertility, although there is also an understanding that it is important to raise the quality of their upbringing and education. While the focus on increasing human capital is economically justified, the desire to increase the birth rate has no such justification. The theory of demographic transition proves that stimulating the birth rate is an erroneous goal. The ‘cash for babies’ policy applied in Russia is based on the conviction that children, even those born in poor and dysfunctional families, inevitably ‘pass’ through the education system and become qualified workers. On the basis of this stereotype, the system of pro-natalist incentives is built in such a way that, in accordance with the law of diminishing marginal utility, it creates stronger incentives for poorer families and is therefore actually aimed at increasing the birth rate primarily in the poor strata, having little effect on middle-class families. Meanwhile, modern theories of social capital and labor market signals prove the limited ability of schools and universities to play the role of social elevators. International studies (in particular, in the USA) shows that state benefits for children of poor and disadvantaged families contribute to the reproduction of a culture of poverty. Therefore, when the Russian authorities provide assistance primarily to low-income and single-parent families with children, they create problems for the future. The study proposes to replace the current policy based on the principle ‘more babies but cheaper’ with a policy aimed at middle-class families and based on the principle ‘less is more’. Thus, an orientation towards stimulating population growth is replaced by an orientation towards fostering human capital.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯亲生育政策及其隐藏的困境
俄罗斯政府的人口政策旨在“保护和增加人口”,结合了两种不同的方法来理解人口下降的问题。大多数情况下,重点放在刺激生育,尽管也有一种理解,即提高他们的抚养和教育质量是重要的。虽然注重增加人力资本在经济上是合理的,但提高出生率的愿望却没有这样的理由。人口转型理论证明,刺激出生率是一个错误的目标。俄罗斯实施的“现金换婴儿”政策是基于这样一种信念:孩子们,即使是那些出生在贫困和不正常家庭的孩子,也不可避免地会“通过”教育体系,成为合格的工人。在这种刻板印象的基础上,支持生育的激励制度是按照边际效用递减规律建立起来的,它为较贫穷的家庭创造了更强的激励,因此实际上旨在主要提高贫困阶层的出生率,对中产阶级家庭几乎没有影响。同时,现代社会资本理论和劳动力市场信号理论也证明了高校发挥社会电梯作用的能力有限。国际研究(特别是在美国)表明,国家对贫困和弱势家庭儿童的福利助长了贫困文化的再现。因此,当俄罗斯当局主要向有子女的低收入和单亲家庭提供援助时,他们就给未来制造了问题。该研究建议用一项针对中产阶级家庭的、基于“少即是多”原则的政策来取代目前基于“多生多便宜”原则的政策。因此,刺激人口增长的方向被培育人力资本的方向所取代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digitalization of the State Financial Control: Institutional Analysis Russian Pro-Natalist Policy and Its Hidden Dilemma Regulation Mechanisms of External Labour Migration Reform of the Russian Pension System: Development Directions and Evaluation Criteria Verbal Interventions of the Bank of Russia and the Interest Rate Structure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1