A Critical Discourse Analysis: The Representation of ‘Homosexual’, ‘Lesbian’, and ‘Gay’ Collocates Words in Cola and BNC Corpus

Restu Anggi Gustara
{"title":"A Critical Discourse Analysis: The\nRepresentation of ‘Homosexual’, ‘Lesbian’, and ‘Gay’ Collocates Words in Cola and BNC Corpus","authors":"Restu Anggi Gustara","doi":"10.29037/DIGITALPRESS.42269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This is a Critical Discourse\nAnalysis of the collocation of ‘homosexual’, ‘lesbian’, and ‘gay’ terms in the\ncorpus data of Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) and British\nNational Corpus (BNC). By conducting Halliday’s theory, this study aims to find\nout the representation of three terms, ‘homosexual’, lesbian’, and ‘gay’, also the\nideology, from the collocation words. As a combined study between Critical\nDiscourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics, a qualitative and quantitative data\nwere used. By using corpus analysis as the method, the researcher analyzes the\nideology based on the collected collocates words. The result of the analysis\nshows that ‘homosexual’, ‘lesbian’, and ‘gay’ has a linier relationship. Those\nthree terms are used in different area of public text, which are ‘homosexual’ is\nmore acceptable in academic term and ‘lesbian’ and ‘gay’ are mostly used in the\nnon-academic term. Even though COCA and BNC show the different amount of their\nexistence, they are share the same collocation: rights, relationship, lifestyle, identity, activist, and couple.\n","PeriodicalId":270635,"journal":{"name":"Digital Press Social Sciences and Humanities","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Press Social Sciences and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29037/DIGITALPRESS.42269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This is a Critical Discourse Analysis of the collocation of ‘homosexual’, ‘lesbian’, and ‘gay’ terms in the corpus data of Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) and British National Corpus (BNC). By conducting Halliday’s theory, this study aims to find out the representation of three terms, ‘homosexual’, lesbian’, and ‘gay’, also the ideology, from the collocation words. As a combined study between Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics, a qualitative and quantitative data were used. By using corpus analysis as the method, the researcher analyzes the ideology based on the collected collocates words. The result of the analysis shows that ‘homosexual’, ‘lesbian’, and ‘gay’ has a linier relationship. Those three terms are used in different area of public text, which are ‘homosexual’ is more acceptable in academic term and ‘lesbian’ and ‘gay’ are mostly used in the non-academic term. Even though COCA and BNC show the different amount of their existence, they are share the same collocation: rights, relationship, lifestyle, identity, activist, and couple.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
批评语篇分析:“同性恋”、“女同性恋”和“同性恋”在Cola和BNC语料库中的搭配表现
本文对当代美国英语语料库(COCA)和英国国家语料库(BNC)的语料库数据中“同性恋”、“女同性恋”和“男同性恋”这三个词的搭配进行了批判性话语分析。本研究旨在通过韩礼德的理论,从搭配词中找出“同性恋”、“女同性恋”和“男同性恋”三个术语的表征以及意识形态。本研究是批评性语篇分析与语料库语言学相结合的研究,采用了定性和定量相结合的方法。以语料库分析为方法,对收集到的搭配词进行思想分析。分析结果表明,“同性恋”、“女同性恋”和“男同性恋”的关系更紧密。这三个词在公共文本的不同领域使用,其中“同性恋”在学术术语中更容易接受,“女同性恋”和“男同性恋”主要用于非学术术语。尽管COCA和BNC的存在程度不同,但它们有着相同的搭配:权利、关系、生活方式、身份、活动家、夫妻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Readiness of Course and Training Agency (LKP) in Link & Match Program with Business and Industry Sector A Systematic Review: Community Support in Employment Skill Development of Intellectual Disabilities People The Role of the Community in Building a Tourist Village Intuition linguistique et stratégie de l’apprentissage des étudiants « faibles » Le modèle d’apprentissage de la production orale à travers Skype basé sur la culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1