A Hybrid Planning System for Smart Charging of Electric Fleets

Kshitij Garg, A. Narayanan, P. Misra, Arunchandar Vasan, Vivek Bandhu, Debarupa Das
{"title":"A Hybrid Planning System for Smart Charging of Electric Fleets","authors":"Kshitij Garg, A. Narayanan, P. Misra, Arunchandar Vasan, Vivek Bandhu, Debarupa Das","doi":"10.1145/3564121.3564125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electric vehicle (EV) fleets are well suited for last-mile deliveries both from sustainability and operational cost perspectives. To ensure economic parity with non-EV options, even captive chargers for EV fleets need to be managed intelligently. Specifically, the EVs needs to be adequately charged for their entire delivery runs while handling reduced time flexibility between runs; limited number of chargers; and deviations from the planned schedule. Existing works either solve smaller instances of this problem optimally, or larger instances with significant sub-optimality. In addition, they typically consider either day-ahead or real-time planning in isolation. We complement existing works with a hybrid approach that first identifies a day-ahead plan for assigning EVs to chargers; and then uses online replanning to handle any deviations in real-time. For the day-ahead planning, we use a learning agent (LA) that learns to assign EVs to chargers over several problem instances. Because the agent solves a given instance during its testing phase, it achieves scale in problem size with limited sub-optimality. For the online replanning, we use a greedy heuristic that dynamically refines the day-ahead plan to handle delays in EV arrivals. We evaluate our approach using representative datasets. As baselines for the LA, we use an exact mixed-integer linear program (MILP) (greedy heuristic) for small (large) problem instances. As baselines for the replanning, we use no-planning and no-replanning. Our experiments show that LA performs better (8.5-14%) than greedy heuristic in large problem instances, while being reasonably close (< 22%) to the optimal in smaller instances. For online replanning, our approach performs about 7-20% better than no-planning and no-replanning for a range of delay profiles.","PeriodicalId":166150,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Second International Conference on AI-ML Systems","volume":"80 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Second International Conference on AI-ML Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3564121.3564125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electric vehicle (EV) fleets are well suited for last-mile deliveries both from sustainability and operational cost perspectives. To ensure economic parity with non-EV options, even captive chargers for EV fleets need to be managed intelligently. Specifically, the EVs needs to be adequately charged for their entire delivery runs while handling reduced time flexibility between runs; limited number of chargers; and deviations from the planned schedule. Existing works either solve smaller instances of this problem optimally, or larger instances with significant sub-optimality. In addition, they typically consider either day-ahead or real-time planning in isolation. We complement existing works with a hybrid approach that first identifies a day-ahead plan for assigning EVs to chargers; and then uses online replanning to handle any deviations in real-time. For the day-ahead planning, we use a learning agent (LA) that learns to assign EVs to chargers over several problem instances. Because the agent solves a given instance during its testing phase, it achieves scale in problem size with limited sub-optimality. For the online replanning, we use a greedy heuristic that dynamically refines the day-ahead plan to handle delays in EV arrivals. We evaluate our approach using representative datasets. As baselines for the LA, we use an exact mixed-integer linear program (MILP) (greedy heuristic) for small (large) problem instances. As baselines for the replanning, we use no-planning and no-replanning. Our experiments show that LA performs better (8.5-14%) than greedy heuristic in large problem instances, while being reasonably close (< 22%) to the optimal in smaller instances. For online replanning, our approach performs about 7-20% better than no-planning and no-replanning for a range of delay profiles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电动汽车智能充电的混合规划系统
从可持续性和运营成本的角度来看,电动汽车(EV)车队都非常适合最后一英里的交付。为了确保与非电动汽车选择的经济平价,即使是电动汽车车队的专属充电器也需要智能管理。具体来说,电动汽车需要在整个交付过程中充分充电,同时处理运行之间减少的时间灵活性;充电器数量有限;以及与计划进度的偏差。现有的工作要么最优地解决了这个问题的较小实例,要么解决了具有显著次最优性的较大实例。此外,他们通常会孤立地考虑提前一天或实时计划。我们采用一种混合方法来补充现有的工作,首先确定将电动汽车分配给充电器的提前计划;然后使用在线重新规划来实时处理任何偏差。对于提前一天的计划,我们使用一个学习代理(LA),它学习在几个问题实例中将电动汽车分配给充电器。因为代理在测试阶段解决了给定的实例,所以它在有限的次最优性下实现了问题规模的扩展。对于在线重新规划,我们使用贪婪启发式算法动态改进日前计划来处理电动汽车到达的延迟。我们使用代表性数据集来评估我们的方法。作为LA的基线,我们对小(大)问题实例使用精确混合整数线性规划(MILP)(贪婪启发式)。作为重新规划的基准,我们使用无规划和无重新规划。我们的实验表明,在大型问题实例中,LA比贪婪启发式算法表现得更好(8.5-14%),而在较小的实例中,LA与最优算法相当接近(< 22%)。对于在线重新规划,我们的方法比无规划和无重新规划在一定范围的延迟配置文件中执行约7-20%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Hybrid Planning System for Smart Charging of Electric Fleets CluSpa: Computation Reduction in CNN Inference by exploiting Clustering and Sparsity Acceleration-aware, Retraining-free Evolutionary Pruning for Automated Fitment of Deep Learning Models on Edge Devices Patch-wise Features for Blur Image Classification Identification of Causal Dependencies in Multivariate Time Series
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1