Pemahaman Siswa Tentang Equal Sign Dalam Menyelesaikantugas Matematika

Setiawan Budi Sartati, Su Banji, Sis Woro
{"title":"Pemahaman Siswa Tentang Equal Sign Dalam Menyelesaikantugas Matematika","authors":"Setiawan Budi Sartati, Su Banji, Sis Woro","doi":"10.53395/jes.v3i2.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Equal sign is a sign that is used as a link in a sentence of equality. Equal sign translated into three sections, among others, as operational namely the equal sign to show results, the equal sign as basic relationalis expressed similarity operating results, and the equal sign as substitution of implying the replacement of one representation to another. Observations indicate that the students glued to view only the equal sign as operational, it is seen from a mistake appears to the statement continued, eg 3 + 4 = 7 + 2. In response, researchers conducted a study to describestudents understanding of the equal sign to solve mathematical tasks. This study was included in the qualitative descriptive study. In this study, the data collected is the data of students work and verbal data (the interview). The subjects were six students of 7th class of MTs Attariqie Malang 2014/2015 (Junior High School), with details of two high-ability students, two students capable of being, and two low-ability students. Students' understanding of the equal sign examined further by providing tests and interviews in six research subjects. Interviews were conducted individually after the students work on the problems individually. The mathematical task load arithmetic and algebra problems. Based on the results of the study, all subjects were able to understand the equal sign as operational and the equal sign as substitution. For equal sign as the basic relational, only high-ability students were able to understand it. Understanding of medium and low student capable entrenched in operational pattern that is equal sign as operational cause confusion to understand equal sign as the basicrelational, eg,14+11=25+8where students only pay attention to the results of operations that 14 plus 11 is 25 without notice relationo f addition of 8.Keywords: equal sign, operational, basic relational, substitution, mathematic, arithmetic, algebra.","PeriodicalId":297112,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Edukasi Sumba (JES)","volume":"17 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Edukasi Sumba (JES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53395/jes.v3i2.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Equal sign is a sign that is used as a link in a sentence of equality. Equal sign translated into three sections, among others, as operational namely the equal sign to show results, the equal sign as basic relationalis expressed similarity operating results, and the equal sign as substitution of implying the replacement of one representation to another. Observations indicate that the students glued to view only the equal sign as operational, it is seen from a mistake appears to the statement continued, eg 3 + 4 = 7 + 2. In response, researchers conducted a study to describestudents understanding of the equal sign to solve mathematical tasks. This study was included in the qualitative descriptive study. In this study, the data collected is the data of students work and verbal data (the interview). The subjects were six students of 7th class of MTs Attariqie Malang 2014/2015 (Junior High School), with details of two high-ability students, two students capable of being, and two low-ability students. Students' understanding of the equal sign examined further by providing tests and interviews in six research subjects. Interviews were conducted individually after the students work on the problems individually. The mathematical task load arithmetic and algebra problems. Based on the results of the study, all subjects were able to understand the equal sign as operational and the equal sign as substitution. For equal sign as the basic relational, only high-ability students were able to understand it. Understanding of medium and low student capable entrenched in operational pattern that is equal sign as operational cause confusion to understand equal sign as the basicrelational, eg,14+11=25+8where students only pay attention to the results of operations that 14 plus 11 is 25 without notice relationo f addition of 8.Keywords: equal sign, operational, basic relational, substitution, mathematic, arithmetic, algebra.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生对方程符号完成数学作业的理解
等号是在表示相等的句子中用作连接的符号。等号翻译成三个部分,其中,作为操作的等号,即表示结果的等号,作为表示相似操作结果的基本关系式的等号,以及作为替换的等号,意味着将一种表示替换为另一种表示。观察结果表明,学生们固守着只把等号看成运算式,从错误看来要把语句继续下去,例如3 + 4 = 7 + 2。作为回应,研究人员进行了一项研究,以描述学生对等号的理解,以解决数学任务。本研究纳入定性描述性研究。在本研究中,收集的数据是学生的工作数据和口头数据(访谈)。研究对象为2014/2015学年(初中)七班6名学生,其中高能力学生2名,有能力学生2名,低能力学生2名。通过对六个研究对象的测试和访谈,进一步考察了学生对等号的理解。在学生单独解决问题后,分别进行访谈。数学任务负载算术和代数问题。根据研究结果,所有受试者都能够理解等号为运算式,等号为代换式。对于等号作为基本关系,只有高水平的学生才能理解。对中低年级学生能力的理解,固守着等号为运算的运算模式,导致对等号为基本关系式的理解混乱,例如,14+11=25+8,学生只注意14+11=25的运算结果,而不注意8的加法关系。关键词:等号,运算,基本关系,代换,数学,算术,代数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pengembangan Kurikuklum Merdeka Belajar di Era Society 5.0 Peningkatan Kompetensi Guru Bahasa Inggris dalam Menyusun RPP Berdiferensiasi melalui Kegiatan Belajar Kelompok di SMP Negeri 1 Lewa dan SMP Negeri 2 Waingapu T.P 2021/2022 PENERAPAN MEDIA GAMBAR UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN PPKn DI KELAS V SDN POGO LEDE TAHUN PELAJARAN 2022/2023 Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Multilingual Berbasis Konten dan Konteks Budaya Lokal Etnis Ngada pada Tema Hidup Bersih dan Sehat untuk Siswa Kelas 2 Sekolah Dasar Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Standar Proses dalam Kurikulum 2013 pada Pembelajaran Fisika di SMA Kecamatan Kota Tambolaka dan Loura Kabupaten Sumba Barat Daya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1