{"title":"Exploring the Relationships between Job Satisfaction, Work Engagement and Loyalty of Academic Staff","authors":"I. Ludviga, A. Kalviņa","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.1110944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to link together the concepts of job \nsatisfaction, work engagement, trust, job meaningfulness and loyalty \nto the organisation focusing on specific type of employment – \nacademic jobs. The research investigates the relationships between \njob satisfaction, work engagement and loyalty as well as the impact \nof trust and job meaningfulness on the work engagement and loyalty. \nThe survey was conducted in one of the largest Latvian higher \neducation institutions and the sample was drawn from academic staff \n(n=326). Structured questionnaire with 44 reflective type questions \nwas developed to measure the constructs. Data was analysed using \nSPSS and Smart-PLS software. Variance based structural equation \nmodelling (PLS-SEM) technique was used to test the model and to \npredict the most important factors relevant to employee engagement \nand loyalty. The first order model included two endogenous \nconstructs (loyalty and intention to stay and recommend to work in \nthis organisation, and employee engagement), as well as six \nexogenous constructs (feeling of fair treatment and trust in \nmanagement; career growth opportunities; compensation, pay and \nbenefits; management; colleagues and teamwork; and finally job \nmeaningfulness). Job satisfaction was developed as second order \nconstruct and both: first and second order models were designed for \ndata analysis. It was found that academics are more engaged than \nsatisfied with their work and main reason for that was found to be job \nmeaningfulness, which is significant predictor for work engagement, \nbut not for job satisfaction. Compensation is not significantly related \nto work engagement, but only to job satisfaction. Trust was not \nsignificantly related neither to engagement, nor to satisfaction, \nhowever, it appeared to be significant predictor of loyalty and \nintentions to stay with the University. Paper revealed academic jobs \nas specific kind of employment where employees can be more \nengaged than satisfied and highlighted the specific role of job \nmeaningfulness in the University settings.","PeriodicalId":224473,"journal":{"name":"World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1110944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Abstract
This paper aims to link together the concepts of job
satisfaction, work engagement, trust, job meaningfulness and loyalty
to the organisation focusing on specific type of employment –
academic jobs. The research investigates the relationships between
job satisfaction, work engagement and loyalty as well as the impact
of trust and job meaningfulness on the work engagement and loyalty.
The survey was conducted in one of the largest Latvian higher
education institutions and the sample was drawn from academic staff
(n=326). Structured questionnaire with 44 reflective type questions
was developed to measure the constructs. Data was analysed using
SPSS and Smart-PLS software. Variance based structural equation
modelling (PLS-SEM) technique was used to test the model and to
predict the most important factors relevant to employee engagement
and loyalty. The first order model included two endogenous
constructs (loyalty and intention to stay and recommend to work in
this organisation, and employee engagement), as well as six
exogenous constructs (feeling of fair treatment and trust in
management; career growth opportunities; compensation, pay and
benefits; management; colleagues and teamwork; and finally job
meaningfulness). Job satisfaction was developed as second order
construct and both: first and second order models were designed for
data analysis. It was found that academics are more engaged than
satisfied with their work and main reason for that was found to be job
meaningfulness, which is significant predictor for work engagement,
but not for job satisfaction. Compensation is not significantly related
to work engagement, but only to job satisfaction. Trust was not
significantly related neither to engagement, nor to satisfaction,
however, it appeared to be significant predictor of loyalty and
intentions to stay with the University. Paper revealed academic jobs
as specific kind of employment where employees can be more
engaged than satisfied and highlighted the specific role of job
meaningfulness in the University settings.