Accession to the EU's Competition Law Regime: A Law and Governance Approach

Kati Cseres
{"title":"Accession to the EU's Competition Law Regime: A Law and Governance Approach","authors":"Kati Cseres","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2738416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Competition law has always formed a core pillar of the European integration process and so it was among the crucial EU requirements set for the candidate countries. Competition law had a significant influence on the way competition laws and institutions were shaped in the candidate countries. In the pre-accession phase this was due to conditionality, however once conditionality terminates and candidate countries become Member States they fall under the EU law and its governance mechanisms, in competition law under Regulation 1/2003. While pre-accession rule transposition is well documented and closely monitored by the EU in its Regular Reports on the candidate countries, the EU’s internal governance mechanisms are less visible and have not been examined in the light of its external model that developed in the course of its eastward enlargement. In EU competition law such internal mechanisms have developed within the framework of Regulation 1/2003. These post-accession compliance mechanisms are critical both with regard to the effectiveness of the EU’s external governance and the internal system of Regulation 1/2003.The aim of this paper is to analyse the interplay between the EU’s external (pre-accession) and internal (post-accession) governance model in the field of competition law and to arrive at a deeper understanding of the EU’s Europeanization strategy at the intersection of the external and internal governance models. Accordingly, the paper maps the EU’s external law and governance model that applies vis-a-vis third countries that wish to join the EU and examines to what extent and how this external model has shaped the EU’s internal governance model vis-a-vis its Member States. It analyses the role of Regulation 1/2003 in creating an effective implementation of EU competition law in the Member States and its governance mechanisms that framed the Europeanization process. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of post-accession compliance in the Member States the paper examines the compound procedural framework composed of EU and national administrative rules that underlies and challenges the enforcement of EU competition law and investigates how administrative capacity of the national competition authorities may effect competition law enforcement. This inquiry includes the detailed assessment of the European Competition Network as the EU’s main mechanism to monitor compliance of Member States with EU law in the post-accession phase.","PeriodicalId":306463,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Public Law - Antitrust (Topic)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Public Law - Antitrust (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2738416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Competition law has always formed a core pillar of the European integration process and so it was among the crucial EU requirements set for the candidate countries. Competition law had a significant influence on the way competition laws and institutions were shaped in the candidate countries. In the pre-accession phase this was due to conditionality, however once conditionality terminates and candidate countries become Member States they fall under the EU law and its governance mechanisms, in competition law under Regulation 1/2003. While pre-accession rule transposition is well documented and closely monitored by the EU in its Regular Reports on the candidate countries, the EU’s internal governance mechanisms are less visible and have not been examined in the light of its external model that developed in the course of its eastward enlargement. In EU competition law such internal mechanisms have developed within the framework of Regulation 1/2003. These post-accession compliance mechanisms are critical both with regard to the effectiveness of the EU’s external governance and the internal system of Regulation 1/2003.The aim of this paper is to analyse the interplay between the EU’s external (pre-accession) and internal (post-accession) governance model in the field of competition law and to arrive at a deeper understanding of the EU’s Europeanization strategy at the intersection of the external and internal governance models. Accordingly, the paper maps the EU’s external law and governance model that applies vis-a-vis third countries that wish to join the EU and examines to what extent and how this external model has shaped the EU’s internal governance model vis-a-vis its Member States. It analyses the role of Regulation 1/2003 in creating an effective implementation of EU competition law in the Member States and its governance mechanisms that framed the Europeanization process. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of post-accession compliance in the Member States the paper examines the compound procedural framework composed of EU and national administrative rules that underlies and challenges the enforcement of EU competition law and investigates how administrative capacity of the national competition authorities may effect competition law enforcement. This inquiry includes the detailed assessment of the European Competition Network as the EU’s main mechanism to monitor compliance of Member States with EU law in the post-accession phase.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加入欧盟竞争法制度:法律与治理方法
竞争法一直是欧洲一体化进程的核心支柱,因此它是欧盟为候选国设定的关键要求之一。竞争法对候选国家的竞争法和制度的形成方式产生了重大影响。在加入前阶段,这是由于条件性,然而,一旦条件性终止,候选国成为成员国,它们就属于欧盟法律及其治理机制,即第1/2003号条例下的竞争法。虽然欧盟在其关于候选国的定期报告中对加入前规则的转换有充分的记录和密切的监测,但欧盟的内部治理机制不太明显,也没有根据其在东扩过程中形成的外部模式进行审查。在欧盟竞争法中,这种内部机制是在第1/2003号条例的框架内发展起来的。这些加入后的合规机制对于欧盟外部治理的有效性和第1/2003号法规的内部系统都至关重要。本文的目的是分析欧盟在竞争法领域的外部(加入前)和内部(加入后)治理模式之间的相互作用,并在外部和内部治理模式的交叉点上对欧盟的欧洲化战略有更深的理解。因此,本文描绘了欧盟的外部法律和治理模式,适用于希望加入欧盟的第三国,并研究了这种外部模式在多大程度上以及如何塑造了欧盟对其成员国的内部治理模式。它分析了第1/2003号条例在成员国有效实施欧盟竞争法方面的作用,以及构成欧化进程的治理机制。为了评估成员国加入欧盟后合规的有效性,本文考察了构成欧盟竞争法执行基础和挑战的欧盟和国家行政规则的复合程序框架,并调查了国家竞争主管部门的行政能力如何影响竞争执法。该调查包括对欧洲竞争网络的详细评估,该网络是欧盟在加入欧盟后阶段监测成员国遵守欧盟法律的主要机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
'Competition Overdose': Curing Markets from Themselves? Ten Points for Discussion Exploitative Abuses: Recent Trends and Comparative Perspectives Setting the Edge: How the NCAA Can Defend Amateurism by Allowing Third Party Compensation Competition in Digital Markets: A Review of Expert Reports The Israeli Statute on National Book Price Maintenance - A Critical Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1