{"title":"iNOA","authors":"Yaohua Chang, Zhiping Liu","doi":"10.1145/3417519.3417551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gene Ontology (GO) consortium provides the largest functional annotations of genes, and GO enrichment analysis is almost regarded as a standard-like analytical method in computationally biomedical researches. Network biology reveals that molecular interactions rather than individual genes perform their functions in cells, which makes network ontology analysis (NOA) of gene functions come into being. In NOA, the edge of a biomolecular network is annotated by the shared GO terms of interacting genes that proved to be better in function enrichments. However, semantic similarity is ubiquitous between GO terms. The annotations that simply endue edges without considering semantic relationship will deprive lots of crucial information of GO terms. Here, we explore an improvement of NOA with GO semantic similarity (iNOA). iNOA first retrieves the functions of all involved genes from the GO database, and then calculates the semantic similarity of the annotated terms in two genes as that in NOA. We further implement the semantic similarity based on GO graph in the measurement. The semantic similarity value calculated for two GO terms replaces the original counting number of the same GO terms annotated to the two genes of an edge. Then we apply a hypergeometric test to enrich important functions in a network. To prove the effectiveness of iNOA, a specific endometrial cancer gene network is constructed. The enriched results indicate iNOA can obtain more effective and more specific GO functions than NOA and the other gene list methods.","PeriodicalId":158714,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2020 5th International Conference on Biomedical Signal and Image Processing","volume":"182 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2020 5th International Conference on Biomedical Signal and Image Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3417519.3417551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gene Ontology (GO) consortium provides the largest functional annotations of genes, and GO enrichment analysis is almost regarded as a standard-like analytical method in computationally biomedical researches. Network biology reveals that molecular interactions rather than individual genes perform their functions in cells, which makes network ontology analysis (NOA) of gene functions come into being. In NOA, the edge of a biomolecular network is annotated by the shared GO terms of interacting genes that proved to be better in function enrichments. However, semantic similarity is ubiquitous between GO terms. The annotations that simply endue edges without considering semantic relationship will deprive lots of crucial information of GO terms. Here, we explore an improvement of NOA with GO semantic similarity (iNOA). iNOA first retrieves the functions of all involved genes from the GO database, and then calculates the semantic similarity of the annotated terms in two genes as that in NOA. We further implement the semantic similarity based on GO graph in the measurement. The semantic similarity value calculated for two GO terms replaces the original counting number of the same GO terms annotated to the two genes of an edge. Then we apply a hypergeometric test to enrich important functions in a network. To prove the effectiveness of iNOA, a specific endometrial cancer gene network is constructed. The enriched results indicate iNOA can obtain more effective and more specific GO functions than NOA and the other gene list methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
iNOA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1