{"title":"Formal specification and analysis of DMI-an X-25 based protocol","authors":"V. Gehlot, Insup Lee","doi":"10.1109/INFCOM.1988.12975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The digital multiplexed interface (DMI) specifies the interface requirements for multiplexed data communication over digital facilities between a host computer and a PBX. A part of the DMI's packet-mode data-transfer protocol, which is based on the X.25 packet-level protocols, is specified formally using the selection/resolution (S/R) model. A formal verification of the resetting phase of this protocol, using the S/R-model-based software tool SPANNER, is presented. It is shown that the protocol is not fully correct in the sense that some sequence of events may lead it to unsafe states. These states give rise to a livelock situation. A way to rectify this problem is suggested.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":436217,"journal":{"name":"IEEE INFOCOM '88,Seventh Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communcations Societies. Networks: Evolution or Revolution?","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE INFOCOM '88,Seventh Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communcations Societies. Networks: Evolution or Revolution?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFCOM.1988.12975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The digital multiplexed interface (DMI) specifies the interface requirements for multiplexed data communication over digital facilities between a host computer and a PBX. A part of the DMI's packet-mode data-transfer protocol, which is based on the X.25 packet-level protocols, is specified formally using the selection/resolution (S/R) model. A formal verification of the resetting phase of this protocol, using the S/R-model-based software tool SPANNER, is presented. It is shown that the protocol is not fully correct in the sense that some sequence of events may lead it to unsafe states. These states give rise to a livelock situation. A way to rectify this problem is suggested.<>