M. Soltanalipour, M. Ballester, F. Carvajal, J. Holomek, M. Bajer
{"title":"An Experimental and Numerical Study of the Load Distribution Effect on Composite Slab Shear Resistance","authors":"M. Soltanalipour, M. Ballester, F. Carvajal, J. Holomek, M. Bajer","doi":"10.18178/ijscer.8.2.101-106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The design codes prescribe “a close simulation” of the uniformly distributed loads for bending tests, since, applying an ideal uniform load on the slab surface, is not technically as simple as applying concentrated loads by spreader beams. The 4-point bending test used in both standard methods m-k and PCM to determine the shear resistance of composite slabs is currently the most conventional loading arrangement. This article presents the comparison between the 4-point bending and uniform load results, obtained from both experimental tests and numerical simulations. Two groups of specimens, made with a common trapezoidal steel profile and concrete, including short and long spans, have been tested under the two loading setups. The numerical analysis of these slabs has been carried out through modelling the realistic interaction of steel and concrete. For the 4-point bending simulation, predefined vertical cracks are modelled representing the real crack inducers, whereas, for the uniform load case, the Willam-Warnke model is used. Both the experimental and the numerical results indicated that the 4-point bending test provides higher shear strength than uniform load. The experimental part was conducted by LERMA (Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya – BarcelonaTech) in collaboration with AdMaS-BUT at Brno University of Technology. The 3D FEM of composite slabs has been made through ANSYS software.","PeriodicalId":101411,"journal":{"name":"International journal of structural and civil engineering research","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of structural and civil engineering research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijscer.8.2.101-106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The design codes prescribe “a close simulation” of the uniformly distributed loads for bending tests, since, applying an ideal uniform load on the slab surface, is not technically as simple as applying concentrated loads by spreader beams. The 4-point bending test used in both standard methods m-k and PCM to determine the shear resistance of composite slabs is currently the most conventional loading arrangement. This article presents the comparison between the 4-point bending and uniform load results, obtained from both experimental tests and numerical simulations. Two groups of specimens, made with a common trapezoidal steel profile and concrete, including short and long spans, have been tested under the two loading setups. The numerical analysis of these slabs has been carried out through modelling the realistic interaction of steel and concrete. For the 4-point bending simulation, predefined vertical cracks are modelled representing the real crack inducers, whereas, for the uniform load case, the Willam-Warnke model is used. Both the experimental and the numerical results indicated that the 4-point bending test provides higher shear strength than uniform load. The experimental part was conducted by LERMA (Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya – BarcelonaTech) in collaboration with AdMaS-BUT at Brno University of Technology. The 3D FEM of composite slabs has been made through ANSYS software.
设计规范规定了弯曲试验中均匀分布荷载的“紧密模拟”,因为在板坯表面施加理想的均匀荷载,在技术上并不像通过铺展梁施加集中荷载那么简单。标准方法m-k和PCM均采用四点弯曲试验来确定复合板的抗剪能力,这是目前最常用的加载方式。本文介绍了四点弯曲和均布荷载试验结果与数值模拟结果的比较。两组由普通梯形钢型材和混凝土制成的试件,包括短跨和长跨,在两种加载设置下进行了测试。通过模拟钢与混凝土的真实相互作用,对这些楼板进行了数值分析。对于四点弯曲模拟,预定义的垂直裂纹被建模代表真实的裂纹诱导源,而对于均匀荷载情况,则使用william - warnke模型。试验和数值结果均表明,四点弯曲试验比均布荷载具有更高的抗剪强度。实验部分由LERMA (Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya - BarcelonaTech)与AdMaS-BUT在布尔诺理工大学合作进行。利用ANSYS软件对复合板进行了三维有限元分析。