Developing “Enclave Agriculture”: A New Path of Agricultural Intensive Production Mode in Ethnic Areas
Xing Gao
{"title":"Developing “Enclave Agriculture”: A New Path of Agricultural Intensive Production Mode in Ethnic Areas","authors":"Xing Gao","doi":"10.2991/iceess-19.2019.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Enclave Economy” is a new model for the coordinated development of regional economy in China, which was introduced into coastal cities in the late 20th century. Through more than 20 years of research and practice, it has solved the problem of industrial upgrading and transfer in the east and changed the backward situation of industrial development in the west. Applying the “enclave economy” model to agricultural development can boost the industrialization and intensive development of agriculture in China, especially in ethnic areas, poverty-stricken areas and areas lacking land resources, which further highlights the adaptability of “enclave economy”. This paper generalizes the successful experience and inspiration to ethnic areas by introducing the “enclave economy” model of agriculture in Shibadong Village, Xiangxi Autonomous Prefecture, Hunan Province. It can resolve the existing problems and contradictions and promote the sustainable economic development of ethnic areas by taking \"enclave economy\" as a new form that can be copied and popularized. Keywords—enclave economy, ethnic areas, agricultural development, problems and suggestions I. PROBLEM INTRODUCTION The term “enclave” in the “enclave economy” was not an economic term in the early days, but inherited and evolved from the concept of politics and geography. The concept of “enclave” was gradually brought in the economic filed with the rapid progress of global economic integration. The widely accepted explanation of \"enclave economy\" is put forward by Zhou Min, an American urban economist, who insisted that in the process of economic development, two independent economies have broken the restrictions of administrative divisions and carried out economic development and management through bilateral consultation, construction and other cooperation mechanisms thereby realizing the economic development model of complementary advantages and mutual benefit [1]. Foreign research and exploration on the enclave economy can be traced back to the end of the last century. “The Enclave Economy” written by Gallagher and Zarsky was the first book named after the “enclave economy”. In this book, they comprehensively and systematically discussed the issues of FDI and sustainable development by taking Mexican IT industry as an example [2]. Craig studied mining projects in Papua New Guinea and found that they played a weak role in promoting local economic development [3]; Kevin P. Gallagher reviewed Mexico's “enclave economy” practice and pointed out that \"enclave economy\" such as Mexico's FDI can promote the development of the \"enclave economy\" in developing countries only with the support of effective policies and strategies [4]. From the perspective of model analysis, Kaulik and Manash built a new theoretical analysis framework on the relationship between foreign enclaves and economic development based on the Harris-Todaro model and systematically discussed the economic growth dynamics in underdeveloped countries or regions with large number of foreign enclaves. Their research shows that although the reduction of foreign tax rate will lead to a decline in national income in the short term, in some cases, it will improve the long-term equilibrium level of national income. From the standpoint of developed countries, they believe that enclaves can contribute to sustained economic growth in less developed countries with appropriate fiscal and tax policy adjustments [5]. Domestic scholars began their research on enclave economy in the 1990s. Zhou Ke and Guzhou Yang put forward the background of international regression and believed that the anti-globalization policy will affect economic development [6]; Shen Changgeng, Cao Daming and He Weijun introduced the development of ethnic areas into the “enclave economy” model, holding that it is necessary to establish an innovation from the perspective of organization and system and a transformation from blood-transfusion help to hematopoietic assistance, and the \"enclave economy\" mode can exactly solve these problems [7]; Yang Chunping, Chen Shibo and Xie Haiyan proposed the study of ecological compensation. Taking the “enclave economy” as the development model to solve the ecologically fragile area, and using Sichuan-Aba Industrial Park as the research site, they pointed out and explained the problems existed in the current ecological compensation such as the scope is very narrow, the standards are different and the capital sources are restricted, which resulted in various restrictions on the development of ethnic areas. The past way can neither satisfy the economic development nor protect the ecology more Project funding: innovative research projects for postgraduates: Posttranscendence--Exploring the Development Model of \"Enclave Economy\" in Ethnic Areas (CX2019BS04), the project is funded by innovative research projects for postgraduates of Southwest Minzu University 2nd International Conference on Education, Economics and Social Science (ICEESS 2019) Copyright © 2019, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 357","PeriodicalId":318820,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Education, Economics and Social Science (ICEESS 2019)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Education, Economics and Social Science (ICEESS 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/iceess-19.2019.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
“Enclave Economy” is a new model for the coordinated development of regional economy in China, which was introduced into coastal cities in the late 20th century. Through more than 20 years of research and practice, it has solved the problem of industrial upgrading and transfer in the east and changed the backward situation of industrial development in the west. Applying the “enclave economy” model to agricultural development can boost the industrialization and intensive development of agriculture in China, especially in ethnic areas, poverty-stricken areas and areas lacking land resources, which further highlights the adaptability of “enclave economy”. This paper generalizes the successful experience and inspiration to ethnic areas by introducing the “enclave economy” model of agriculture in Shibadong Village, Xiangxi Autonomous Prefecture, Hunan Province. It can resolve the existing problems and contradictions and promote the sustainable economic development of ethnic areas by taking "enclave economy" as a new form that can be copied and popularized. Keywords—enclave economy, ethnic areas, agricultural development, problems and suggestions I. PROBLEM INTRODUCTION The term “enclave” in the “enclave economy” was not an economic term in the early days, but inherited and evolved from the concept of politics and geography. The concept of “enclave” was gradually brought in the economic filed with the rapid progress of global economic integration. The widely accepted explanation of "enclave economy" is put forward by Zhou Min, an American urban economist, who insisted that in the process of economic development, two independent economies have broken the restrictions of administrative divisions and carried out economic development and management through bilateral consultation, construction and other cooperation mechanisms thereby realizing the economic development model of complementary advantages and mutual benefit [1]. Foreign research and exploration on the enclave economy can be traced back to the end of the last century. “The Enclave Economy” written by Gallagher and Zarsky was the first book named after the “enclave economy”. In this book, they comprehensively and systematically discussed the issues of FDI and sustainable development by taking Mexican IT industry as an example [2]. Craig studied mining projects in Papua New Guinea and found that they played a weak role in promoting local economic development [3]; Kevin P. Gallagher reviewed Mexico's “enclave economy” practice and pointed out that "enclave economy" such as Mexico's FDI can promote the development of the "enclave economy" in developing countries only with the support of effective policies and strategies [4]. From the perspective of model analysis, Kaulik and Manash built a new theoretical analysis framework on the relationship between foreign enclaves and economic development based on the Harris-Todaro model and systematically discussed the economic growth dynamics in underdeveloped countries or regions with large number of foreign enclaves. Their research shows that although the reduction of foreign tax rate will lead to a decline in national income in the short term, in some cases, it will improve the long-term equilibrium level of national income. From the standpoint of developed countries, they believe that enclaves can contribute to sustained economic growth in less developed countries with appropriate fiscal and tax policy adjustments [5]. Domestic scholars began their research on enclave economy in the 1990s. Zhou Ke and Guzhou Yang put forward the background of international regression and believed that the anti-globalization policy will affect economic development [6]; Shen Changgeng, Cao Daming and He Weijun introduced the development of ethnic areas into the “enclave economy” model, holding that it is necessary to establish an innovation from the perspective of organization and system and a transformation from blood-transfusion help to hematopoietic assistance, and the "enclave economy" mode can exactly solve these problems [7]; Yang Chunping, Chen Shibo and Xie Haiyan proposed the study of ecological compensation. Taking the “enclave economy” as the development model to solve the ecologically fragile area, and using Sichuan-Aba Industrial Park as the research site, they pointed out and explained the problems existed in the current ecological compensation such as the scope is very narrow, the standards are different and the capital sources are restricted, which resulted in various restrictions on the development of ethnic areas. The past way can neither satisfy the economic development nor protect the ecology more Project funding: innovative research projects for postgraduates: Posttranscendence--Exploring the Development Model of "Enclave Economy" in Ethnic Areas (CX2019BS04), the project is funded by innovative research projects for postgraduates of Southwest Minzu University 2nd International Conference on Education, Economics and Social Science (ICEESS 2019) Copyright © 2019, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 357
发展“飞地农业”:民族地区农业集约化生产方式的新路径
“飞地经济”是中国区域经济协调发展的一种新模式,于20世纪末引入沿海城市。通过20多年的研究和实践,解决了东部地区产业升级转移问题,改变了西部地区产业发展落后的局面。将“飞地经济”模式应用于农业发展,可以促进中国农业的工业化和集约化发展,特别是在民族地区、贫困地区和土地资源匮乏地区,这进一步凸显了“飞地经济”的适应性。本文以湖南省湘西自治州石坝洞村农业“飞地经济”模式为例,总结了其成功经验及对民族地区的启示。将“飞地经济”作为一种可复制、可推广的新形式,可以解决民族地区存在的问题和矛盾,促进民族地区经济的可持续发展。一、问题简介“飞地经济”中的“飞地”一词在早期并不是一个经济术语,而是由政治和地理概念继承和演变而来的。随着全球经济一体化进程的加快,“飞地”概念逐渐被引入经济领域。“飞地经济”被广泛接受的解释是由美国城市经济学家周民提出的,他认为在经济发展过程中,两个独立的经济体打破了行政区划的限制,通过双边协商、建设等合作机制进行经济发展和管理,从而实现优势互补、互利共赢的经济发展模式bbb。国外对飞地经济的研究和探索可以追溯到上世纪末。加拉格尔和扎尔斯基合著的《飞地经济》是第一本以“飞地经济”命名的书。在这本书中,他们以墨西哥IT产业为例,全面系统地讨论了FDI与可持续发展的问题。克雷格研究了巴布亚新几内亚的采矿项目,发现它们对促进当地经济发展的作用很弱。Kevin P. Gallagher回顾了墨西哥的“飞地经济”实践,指出墨西哥的FDI等“飞地经济”只有在有效的政策和战略支持下才能促进发展中国家“飞地经济”的发展。Kaulik和Manash从模型分析的角度出发,在Harris-Todaro模型的基础上构建了外国飞地与经济发展关系的新的理论分析框架,系统地探讨了拥有大量外国飞地的不发达国家或地区的经济增长动态。他们的研究表明,虽然外国税率的降低在短期内会导致国民收入的下降,但在某些情况下,它会提高国民收入的长期均衡水平。从发达国家的角度来看,他们认为,通过适当的财政和税收政策调整,飞地可以为欠发达国家的持续经济增长做出贡献。国内学者对飞地经济的研究始于20世纪90年代。周珂、杨谷洲提出了国际倒退的背景,认为反全球化政策将影响经济发展[10];沈长庚、曹大明、何伟军将民族地区的发展引入“飞地经济”模式,认为需要从组织和制度的角度进行创新,从输血帮助向造血帮助转变,而“飞地经济”模式恰恰可以解决这些问题b[7];杨春平、陈世波、谢海燕提出生态补偿研究。他们以“飞地经济”作为解决生态脆弱地区的发展模式,并以川阿坝工业园区为研究地点,指出并解释了目前生态补偿存在的范围狭窄、标准参差化、资金来源受限等问题,从而对民族地区的发展造成种种制约。 项目资助:研究生创新研究项目:后超越——民族地区“飞地经济”发展模式探索(CX2019BS04),由西南民族大学第二届教育、经济与社会科学国际会议(ICEESS 2019)研究生创新研究项目资助,版权所有©2019,作者。亚特兰蒂斯出版社出版。这是一篇基于CC BY-NC许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)的开放获取文章。《社会科学、教育和人文研究进展》,第357卷
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。