Evaluation of approximate stochastic Hodgkin-Huxley models

I. Bruce
{"title":"Evaluation of approximate stochastic Hodgkin-Huxley models","authors":"I. Bruce","doi":"10.1109/CNE.2007.369758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fox and colleagues (Fox, 1997; Fox ang Lu, 1994) derived an algorithm based on stochastic differential equations for approximating the kinetics of ion channel gating that is substantially simpler and faster than \"exact\" algorithms for simulating Markov process models of channel gating. However, Mino and colleagues (2002) argued that the approximation may not be sufficiently accurate in describing the statistics of action potential generation. Bruce (2007) subsequently showed that some of the inaccuracies described by Mino et al. (2002 were due to implementation choices, but several important inaccuracies remained. The objective of this study was to develop a framework for analyzing the remaining inaccuracies and determining their origin. Simulations of a patch of membrane with voltage-gated sodium and potassium channels were performed using an exact algorithm for the kinetics of channel gating and the approximate algorithm of Fox. The Fox algorithm assumes that channel gating particle dynamics have a stochastic term that is uncorrelated, zero-mean Gaussian noise, whereas the simulation results of this study demonstrate that in many cases the stochastic term in the Fox algorithm should be correlated and non-Gaussian noise with a non-zero mean. The results indicate that the source of these differences in noise statistics is that the Fox algorithm does not adequately describe the combined behavior of the multiple activation particles in each sodium and potassium channel (three and four, respectively)","PeriodicalId":427054,"journal":{"name":"2007 3rd International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 3rd International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CNE.2007.369758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Fox and colleagues (Fox, 1997; Fox ang Lu, 1994) derived an algorithm based on stochastic differential equations for approximating the kinetics of ion channel gating that is substantially simpler and faster than "exact" algorithms for simulating Markov process models of channel gating. However, Mino and colleagues (2002) argued that the approximation may not be sufficiently accurate in describing the statistics of action potential generation. Bruce (2007) subsequently showed that some of the inaccuracies described by Mino et al. (2002 were due to implementation choices, but several important inaccuracies remained. The objective of this study was to develop a framework for analyzing the remaining inaccuracies and determining their origin. Simulations of a patch of membrane with voltage-gated sodium and potassium channels were performed using an exact algorithm for the kinetics of channel gating and the approximate algorithm of Fox. The Fox algorithm assumes that channel gating particle dynamics have a stochastic term that is uncorrelated, zero-mean Gaussian noise, whereas the simulation results of this study demonstrate that in many cases the stochastic term in the Fox algorithm should be correlated and non-Gaussian noise with a non-zero mean. The results indicate that the source of these differences in noise statistics is that the Fox algorithm does not adequately describe the combined behavior of the multiple activation particles in each sodium and potassium channel (three and four, respectively)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近似随机霍奇金-赫胥黎模型的评价
Fox及其同事(Fox, 1997;Fox ang Lu, 1994)导出了一种基于随机微分方程的近似离子通道门控动力学的算法,该算法比模拟通道门控的马尔可夫过程模型的“精确”算法要简单和快速得多。然而,Mino及其同事(2002)认为,在描述动作电位产生的统计数据时,这种近似可能不够准确。Bruce(2007)随后表明,Mino等人(2002)所描述的一些不准确性是由于实现选择造成的,但一些重要的不准确性仍然存在。本研究的目的是建立一个框架来分析剩余的不准确性并确定其来源。利用通道门控动力学的精确算法和Fox的近似算法,对具有电压门控钠和钾通道的膜片进行了模拟。Fox算法假设通道门控粒子动力学具有不相关的、零均值高斯噪声的随机项,而本研究的仿真结果表明,在许多情况下,Fox算法中的随机项应该具有非零均值的相关非高斯噪声。结果表明,这些噪声统计差异的来源是Fox算法没有充分描述每个钠和钾通道(分别为3和4)中多个激活粒子的综合行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Site-selective Electrical Recording from Small Neuronal Circuits using Spray Patterning Method and Mobile Microelectrodes Use of Intracortical Recordings to Control a Hand Neuroprosthesis A System for Single-trial Analysis of Simultaneously Acquired EEG and fMRI Evaluation of approximate stochastic Hodgkin-Huxley models Iterative Full Head Finite Element Model for Deep Brain Stimulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1