{"title":"Evaluation of approximate stochastic Hodgkin-Huxley models","authors":"I. Bruce","doi":"10.1109/CNE.2007.369758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fox and colleagues (Fox, 1997; Fox ang Lu, 1994) derived an algorithm based on stochastic differential equations for approximating the kinetics of ion channel gating that is substantially simpler and faster than \"exact\" algorithms for simulating Markov process models of channel gating. However, Mino and colleagues (2002) argued that the approximation may not be sufficiently accurate in describing the statistics of action potential generation. Bruce (2007) subsequently showed that some of the inaccuracies described by Mino et al. (2002 were due to implementation choices, but several important inaccuracies remained. The objective of this study was to develop a framework for analyzing the remaining inaccuracies and determining their origin. Simulations of a patch of membrane with voltage-gated sodium and potassium channels were performed using an exact algorithm for the kinetics of channel gating and the approximate algorithm of Fox. The Fox algorithm assumes that channel gating particle dynamics have a stochastic term that is uncorrelated, zero-mean Gaussian noise, whereas the simulation results of this study demonstrate that in many cases the stochastic term in the Fox algorithm should be correlated and non-Gaussian noise with a non-zero mean. The results indicate that the source of these differences in noise statistics is that the Fox algorithm does not adequately describe the combined behavior of the multiple activation particles in each sodium and potassium channel (three and four, respectively)","PeriodicalId":427054,"journal":{"name":"2007 3rd International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 3rd International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CNE.2007.369758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Fox and colleagues (Fox, 1997; Fox ang Lu, 1994) derived an algorithm based on stochastic differential equations for approximating the kinetics of ion channel gating that is substantially simpler and faster than "exact" algorithms for simulating Markov process models of channel gating. However, Mino and colleagues (2002) argued that the approximation may not be sufficiently accurate in describing the statistics of action potential generation. Bruce (2007) subsequently showed that some of the inaccuracies described by Mino et al. (2002 were due to implementation choices, but several important inaccuracies remained. The objective of this study was to develop a framework for analyzing the remaining inaccuracies and determining their origin. Simulations of a patch of membrane with voltage-gated sodium and potassium channels were performed using an exact algorithm for the kinetics of channel gating and the approximate algorithm of Fox. The Fox algorithm assumes that channel gating particle dynamics have a stochastic term that is uncorrelated, zero-mean Gaussian noise, whereas the simulation results of this study demonstrate that in many cases the stochastic term in the Fox algorithm should be correlated and non-Gaussian noise with a non-zero mean. The results indicate that the source of these differences in noise statistics is that the Fox algorithm does not adequately describe the combined behavior of the multiple activation particles in each sodium and potassium channel (three and four, respectively)
Fox及其同事(Fox, 1997;Fox ang Lu, 1994)导出了一种基于随机微分方程的近似离子通道门控动力学的算法,该算法比模拟通道门控的马尔可夫过程模型的“精确”算法要简单和快速得多。然而,Mino及其同事(2002)认为,在描述动作电位产生的统计数据时,这种近似可能不够准确。Bruce(2007)随后表明,Mino等人(2002)所描述的一些不准确性是由于实现选择造成的,但一些重要的不准确性仍然存在。本研究的目的是建立一个框架来分析剩余的不准确性并确定其来源。利用通道门控动力学的精确算法和Fox的近似算法,对具有电压门控钠和钾通道的膜片进行了模拟。Fox算法假设通道门控粒子动力学具有不相关的、零均值高斯噪声的随机项,而本研究的仿真结果表明,在许多情况下,Fox算法中的随机项应该具有非零均值的相关非高斯噪声。结果表明,这些噪声统计差异的来源是Fox算法没有充分描述每个钠和钾通道(分别为3和4)中多个激活粒子的综合行为。