Assessment of CAC self-study report

C. Cook, P. Mathur, M. Visconti
{"title":"Assessment of CAC self-study report","authors":"C. Cook, P. Mathur, M. Visconti","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2004.1408546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2000, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. (ABET) changed the way computer science (and engineering) programs are accredited from a 'checklist' approach to an 'outcomes-based' approach. While this approach gives more freedom to the program to establish its own set of objectives, it has also created considerable anxiety among people who are responsible for preparing their programs for accreditation. The self-study report which plays an important role in the ABET accreditation process, describes how the computer science program satisfies the statement of intent and standards of the accreditation criteria. However, preparation of the report has become more difficult with the change to an outcomes-based approach. We have developed model of an ideal program based on CAC guidelines and standards and a tool that assesses the thoroughness and completeness of the report compared to the model. Programs seeking accreditation can use the tool to get information on any deficiencies prior to submitting the report to the evaluation team.","PeriodicalId":339926,"journal":{"name":"34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004.","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2004.1408546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In 2000, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. (ABET) changed the way computer science (and engineering) programs are accredited from a 'checklist' approach to an 'outcomes-based' approach. While this approach gives more freedom to the program to establish its own set of objectives, it has also created considerable anxiety among people who are responsible for preparing their programs for accreditation. The self-study report which plays an important role in the ABET accreditation process, describes how the computer science program satisfies the statement of intent and standards of the accreditation criteria. However, preparation of the report has become more difficult with the change to an outcomes-based approach. We have developed model of an ideal program based on CAC guidelines and standards and a tool that assesses the thoroughness and completeness of the report compared to the model. Programs seeking accreditation can use the tool to get information on any deficiencies prior to submitting the report to the evaluation team.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CAC自学报告的评估
2000年,工程技术认证委员会(ABET)改变了计算机科学(和工程)项目的认证方式,从“清单”方法改为“基于结果”的方法。虽然这种方法给了项目更多的自由来建立自己的目标,但它也给那些负责为项目准备认证的人带来了相当大的焦虑。在ABET认证过程中起重要作用的自学报告描述了计算机科学课程如何满足认证标准的意图声明和标准。但是,由于改为以结果为基础的办法,报告的编写变得更加困难。我们开发了一个基于CAC指南和标准的理想项目模型,以及一个与模型相比评估报告的彻底性和完整性的工具。寻求认证的项目可以在向评估小组提交报告之前使用该工具获取有关任何缺陷的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teaching entrepreneurial leadership: a project-based approach For an online course encompassing "traditional campus students": how, where, and when students work and engage with the course material The current status of graphical communication in engineering education Work in progress - ethics instruction for the workplace Work in progress: a concept inventory for heat transfer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1