Extended Exposure to Diverse News: Evidence from a Campus Project

Daniel F. Stone, Drew Van Kuiken, Justin Wallace
{"title":"Extended Exposure to Diverse News: Evidence from a Campus Project","authors":"Daniel F. Stone, Drew Van Kuiken, Justin Wallace","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3049015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We report results from a campus project in which participants volunteered to increase their exposure to news from diverse viewpoints for an extended period of time. Specifically, participants read email newsletters from the three leading US cable news stations, CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC, every weekday from April 1-25, 2017. Survey responses indicate that the experience led to increased interest in more diverse news when the project was completed, and an increase in actual consumption of more diverse news several months later, for a majority of the 53 participants who completed the project. The results also indicate that the experience mitigated liberal participants' hostility toward Fox News and President Trump. There was very little evidence of any backfire effects (exacerbation of hostility or disinterest in diverse news). We discuss why the seemingly non-ideal conditions of our experiment (a self-selected subject pool with weak incentives for compliance) likely actually increase the external validity and relevance of our results.","PeriodicalId":345692,"journal":{"name":"Political Methods: Experiments & Experimental Design eJournal","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Methods: Experiments & Experimental Design eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3049015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We report results from a campus project in which participants volunteered to increase their exposure to news from diverse viewpoints for an extended period of time. Specifically, participants read email newsletters from the three leading US cable news stations, CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC, every weekday from April 1-25, 2017. Survey responses indicate that the experience led to increased interest in more diverse news when the project was completed, and an increase in actual consumption of more diverse news several months later, for a majority of the 53 participants who completed the project. The results also indicate that the experience mitigated liberal participants' hostility toward Fox News and President Trump. There was very little evidence of any backfire effects (exacerbation of hostility or disinterest in diverse news). We discuss why the seemingly non-ideal conditions of our experiment (a self-selected subject pool with weak incentives for compliance) likely actually increase the external validity and relevance of our results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扩大接触多样化的新闻:来自校园项目的证据
我们报告了一个校园项目的结果,在这个项目中,参与者自愿在一段时间内增加他们从不同角度接触新闻的机会。具体来说,参与者在2017年4月1日至25日的每个工作日阅读来自美国三大有线新闻网CNN、福克斯新闻和MSNBC的电子邮件时事通讯。调查结果表明,在项目完成后,对于53名完成项目的参与者中的大多数人来说,这种体验导致他们对更多样化的新闻更感兴趣,几个月后,他们对更多样化的新闻的实际消费也有所增加。结果还表明,这一经历减轻了自由派参与者对福克斯新闻和特朗普总统的敌意。几乎没有证据表明有任何适得其反的影响(敌意加剧或对多样化新闻不感兴趣)。我们讨论了为什么我们的实验中看似不理想的条件(一个自我选择的受试者池,对依从性的激励很弱)实际上可能会增加我们结果的外部有效性和相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do American Voters Really Not Punish Overt Undemocratic Behavior at the Polls? Natural Experimental Evidence from the 2021 Insurrection of the U.S. Capitol Absolute versus Relative: Asymmetric Framing and Feedback in a Heterogeneous-Endowment Public Goods Game Improving Studies of Sensitive Topics Using Prior Evidence: A Unified Bayesian Framework for List Experiments Are More Children Better Than One? Evidence from a Lab Experiment of Decision Making Financial Vulnerability and Seeking Expert Advice: Evidence from a Survey Experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1