Counterexample guided abstraction refinement of product-line behavioural models

Maxime Cordy, P. Heymans, Axel Legay, Pierre-Yves Schobbens, Bruno Dawagne, M. Leucker
{"title":"Counterexample guided abstraction refinement of product-line behavioural models","authors":"Maxime Cordy, P. Heymans, Axel Legay, Pierre-Yves Schobbens, Bruno Dawagne, M. Leucker","doi":"10.1145/2635868.2635919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The model-checking problem for Software Products Lines (SPLs) is harder than for single systems: variability constitutes a new source of complexity that exacerbates the state-explosion problem. Abstraction techniques have successfully alleviated state explosion in single-system models. However, they need to be adapted to SPLs, to take into account the set of variants that produce a counterexample. In this paper, we apply CEGAR (Counterexample-Guided Abstraction Refinement) and we design new forms of abstraction specifically for SPLs. We carry out experiments to evaluate the efficiency of our new abstractions. The results show that our abstractions, combined with an appropriate refinement strategy, hold the potential to achieve large reductions in verification time, although they sometimes perform worse. We discuss in which cases a given abstraction should be used.","PeriodicalId":250543,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2635868.2635919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

The model-checking problem for Software Products Lines (SPLs) is harder than for single systems: variability constitutes a new source of complexity that exacerbates the state-explosion problem. Abstraction techniques have successfully alleviated state explosion in single-system models. However, they need to be adapted to SPLs, to take into account the set of variants that produce a counterexample. In this paper, we apply CEGAR (Counterexample-Guided Abstraction Refinement) and we design new forms of abstraction specifically for SPLs. We carry out experiments to evaluate the efficiency of our new abstractions. The results show that our abstractions, combined with an appropriate refinement strategy, hold the potential to achieve large reductions in verification time, although they sometimes perform worse. We discuss in which cases a given abstraction should be used.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反例指导产品线行为模型的抽象细化
软件产品线(SPLs)的模型检查问题比单个系统更难:可变性构成了加剧状态爆炸问题的复杂性的新来源。抽象技术成功地缓解了单系统模型中的状态爆炸。然而,它们需要适应SPLs,以考虑产生反例的变体集。在本文中,我们应用了CEGAR(反例引导抽象细化),并专门为SPLs设计了新的抽象形式。我们进行实验来评估我们的新抽象的效率。结果表明,我们的抽象与适当的细化策略相结合,可以大大减少验证时间,尽管它们有时执行得更差。我们将讨论在哪些情况下应该使用给定的抽象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Omen+: a precise dynamic deadlock detector for multithreaded Java libraries Improving the software testing skills of novices during onboarding through social transparency Counterexample guided abstraction refinement of product-line behavioural models A tool suite for the model-driven software engineering of cyber-physical systems Statistical symbolic execution with informed sampling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1