Comparative analysis of LLQ traffic scheduler to FIFO and CBWFQ on IP phone-based applications (VoIP) using Opnet (Riverbed)

Rizal Broer Bahaweres, Ahmad Fauzi, M. Alaydrus
{"title":"Comparative analysis of LLQ traffic scheduler to FIFO and CBWFQ on IP phone-based applications (VoIP) using Opnet (Riverbed)","authors":"Rizal Broer Bahaweres, Ahmad Fauzi, M. Alaydrus","doi":"10.1109/ICWT.2015.7449215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, world is on going to “Convergence Era”, where data, voice, and video overcome to pass through same network, like IP network. Unfortunately, the fast growth of application technology has not been supported yet by default IP network in the case of quality of service. We have known, that voice over IP services have sensitivity to delay, jitter and latency. And it require of different bandwidth which is also required some service guarantee. How to comparing queue mechanism of VoIP attributed to QoS?. In this case, we need to give guarantee of QoS relied on operation of data packages to be delivered along with its scheduling. Scheduling represent queue mechanism from an applying of network QoS's, that is an arrangement process of an exit and entry of assumed data packages queuing exceed CIR (Committed Information Rate) specified. Regulation of this data exit and entry can be formed with specified classification. This research compare queue method of First In First Out (FIFO) with two algorithm type of WFQ scheduling which at most used, that is Class Based Weighted Fair Queuing (CBWFQ) and Low Latency Queuing (LLQ). Based on delay, jitter, and MOS (Mean Opinion Score) obtained, LLQ give a better network performance.","PeriodicalId":371814,"journal":{"name":"2015 1st International Conference on Wireless and Telematics (ICWT)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 1st International Conference on Wireless and Telematics (ICWT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWT.2015.7449215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Nowadays, world is on going to “Convergence Era”, where data, voice, and video overcome to pass through same network, like IP network. Unfortunately, the fast growth of application technology has not been supported yet by default IP network in the case of quality of service. We have known, that voice over IP services have sensitivity to delay, jitter and latency. And it require of different bandwidth which is also required some service guarantee. How to comparing queue mechanism of VoIP attributed to QoS?. In this case, we need to give guarantee of QoS relied on operation of data packages to be delivered along with its scheduling. Scheduling represent queue mechanism from an applying of network QoS's, that is an arrangement process of an exit and entry of assumed data packages queuing exceed CIR (Committed Information Rate) specified. Regulation of this data exit and entry can be formed with specified classification. This research compare queue method of First In First Out (FIFO) with two algorithm type of WFQ scheduling which at most used, that is Class Based Weighted Fair Queuing (CBWFQ) and Low Latency Queuing (LLQ). Based on delay, jitter, and MOS (Mean Opinion Score) obtained, LLQ give a better network performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于Opnet(河床)的IP电话应用(VoIP)中LLQ流量调度与FIFO和CBWFQ流量调度的比较分析
如今,世界正在走向“融合时代”,数据、语音、视频跨越同一个网络,如IP网络。遗憾的是,在服务质量的情况下,默认IP网络还不能支持应用技术的快速发展。我们已经知道,IP语音服务对延迟、抖动和延迟很敏感。它需要不同的带宽,也需要一定的业务保障。如何比较基于QoS的VoIP队列机制?在这种情况下,我们需要根据将要发送的数据包的运行及其调度来保证QoS。调度是一种应用网络QoS的队列机制,即对假定的数据包排队超过CIR (Committed Information Rate,承诺信息率)的出、入进行安排的过程。对该数据的出口和输入可以形成规定的分类。本文将先进先出(FIFO)的队列方法与常用的两种WFQ调度算法——基于类的加权公平队列(CBWFQ)和低延迟队列(LLQ)进行了比较。从时延、抖动和得到的MOS (Mean Opinion Score)来看,LLQ能提供更好的网络性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of LLQ traffic scheduler to FIFO and CBWFQ on IP phone-based applications (VoIP) using Opnet (Riverbed) Polygon WebGIS of distric level for development and monitoring of PUSKESMAS in health care services Broadband user demand forecasting in Indonesia based on Fourier analysis Artificial immune wireless intelligent sensor and actuator network (WISAN) for more electrical aircraft performance monitoring system (Study case: 80 passenger aircraft) Hubber strategy and regulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1