The Development of Lockean Moral Philosophy

{"title":"The Development of Lockean Moral Philosophy","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/9781108662048.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whereas Paley’s political philosophy engaged explicitly with the hot political issues of the 1780s, including proposals for the reduction of regal influence and the improvement of parliamentary representation, the context of his ethical thought is more difficult to reconstruct. We know that much of the Principleswas based on lectures given at Christ’s College in the early 1770s. Paley was admitted to Christ’s as a sizar on 16 November 1758 and started his residence in October 1759, having been a pupil at the free grammar school in Giggleswick in theWest Riding of Yorkshire, where his father was headmaster. A capable mathematician, he graduated as senior wrangler in June 1763. Unhappy spells as a schoolmaster’s assistant at Dr Bracken’s academy in Greenwich and then as an assistant curate (‘the rat of rats’, as he put it) were brought to an end in 1766when he was elected a fellow of Christ’s following his receipt of the Cambridge Members’ prize in 1765 for an essay in Latin on the relative merits of Stoicism and Epicureanism. Vacating Christ’s in 1776, Paley took up residence among the rural community of Appleby in the diocese of Carlisle. Then, from 1780 onwards, he had two houses, a prebendal residence in the close of Carlisle Cathedral and the vicarage at Dalston. In 1782 he replaced John Law, his college friend and confidant, as Archdeacon of Carlisle. He owed these appointments to John’s father, the eminent theologian Bishop Edmund Law. In the late 1770s, Edmund began pressing Paley to get on with the job of developing the lectures into a book. The Bishop’s apparent anxiety about Paley’s slow progress was undoubtedly brought on by the changing intellectual climate at Cambridge. In an atmosphere of toleration and erudition, natural-theological apologetics flourished in ‘Whig-Cambridge’ for much of the eighteenth century, and, as Paley recognised in his dedicatory preface to the Principles, few had","PeriodicalId":414059,"journal":{"name":"Utilitarianism in the Age of Enlightenment","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilitarianism in the Age of Enlightenment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108662048.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whereas Paley’s political philosophy engaged explicitly with the hot political issues of the 1780s, including proposals for the reduction of regal influence and the improvement of parliamentary representation, the context of his ethical thought is more difficult to reconstruct. We know that much of the Principleswas based on lectures given at Christ’s College in the early 1770s. Paley was admitted to Christ’s as a sizar on 16 November 1758 and started his residence in October 1759, having been a pupil at the free grammar school in Giggleswick in theWest Riding of Yorkshire, where his father was headmaster. A capable mathematician, he graduated as senior wrangler in June 1763. Unhappy spells as a schoolmaster’s assistant at Dr Bracken’s academy in Greenwich and then as an assistant curate (‘the rat of rats’, as he put it) were brought to an end in 1766when he was elected a fellow of Christ’s following his receipt of the Cambridge Members’ prize in 1765 for an essay in Latin on the relative merits of Stoicism and Epicureanism. Vacating Christ’s in 1776, Paley took up residence among the rural community of Appleby in the diocese of Carlisle. Then, from 1780 onwards, he had two houses, a prebendal residence in the close of Carlisle Cathedral and the vicarage at Dalston. In 1782 he replaced John Law, his college friend and confidant, as Archdeacon of Carlisle. He owed these appointments to John’s father, the eminent theologian Bishop Edmund Law. In the late 1770s, Edmund began pressing Paley to get on with the job of developing the lectures into a book. The Bishop’s apparent anxiety about Paley’s slow progress was undoubtedly brought on by the changing intellectual climate at Cambridge. In an atmosphere of toleration and erudition, natural-theological apologetics flourished in ‘Whig-Cambridge’ for much of the eighteenth century, and, as Paley recognised in his dedicatory preface to the Principles, few had
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
洛克道德哲学的发展
尽管Paley的政治哲学明确涉及18世纪80年代的热点政治问题,包括减少王室影响力和改善议会代表制的建议,但他的伦理思想的背景更难以重建。我们知道,《原则》的大部分内容是基于18世纪70年代初基督学院的讲座。1758年11月16日,佩利被基督教堂录取,成为一名学生。1759年10月,他开始在约克郡西区的吉格勒斯维克免费文法学校上学,他的父亲是校长。作为一名有能力的数学家,他于1763年6月以高级牧马人的身份毕业。1765年,他凭借一篇关于斯多葛派和伊壁鸠鲁派相对优点的拉丁文论文获得剑桥会员奖,被选为基督会会员。1766年,他在格林尼治的布莱肯博士学院担任校长助理,之后又担任副牧师助理(他称之为“老鼠中的老鼠”),这段不愉快的时光就此结束。1776年,佩利离开基督教堂,在卡莱尔教区的阿普尔比农村社区居住。然后,从1780年开始,他有了两栋房子,一幢位于卡莱尔大教堂附近的私人住宅,还有一幢在达尔斯顿的牧师公馆。1782年,他取代了他的大学朋友和知己约翰·劳,成为卡莱尔的副主教。他把这些任命归功于约翰的父亲,著名神学家埃德蒙·劳主教。18世纪70年代末,埃德蒙开始催促佩利把这些讲稿编成一本书。主教对佩利进展缓慢的明显焦虑,无疑是由剑桥大学不断变化的学术氛围引起的。在宽容和博学的氛围中,自然神学护教学在18世纪的辉格剑桥盛行,正如佩利在他为《原则》所作的序言中所承认的那样,很少有人这样做
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Development of Lockean Moral Philosophy From Paley to Malthus The Problem of Poverty ‘Taking the Pruning Knife to the Branch’ Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1