Choosing Appropriate AI-enabled Edge Devices, Not the Costly Ones

Ziyang Zhang, Feng Li, Changyao Lin, Shihui Wen, Xiangyu Liu, Jie Liu
{"title":"Choosing Appropriate AI-enabled Edge Devices, Not the Costly Ones","authors":"Ziyang Zhang, Feng Li, Changyao Lin, Shihui Wen, Xiangyu Liu, Jie Liu","doi":"10.1109/ICPADS53394.2021.00031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advances in Edge AI make it possible to achieve inference deep learning for emerging applications, e.g., smart transportation and smart city on the edge in real-time. Nowadays, different industry companies have developed several edge AI devices with various architectures. However, it is hard for application users to justify how to choose the appropriate edge-AI, due to the lack of benchmark testing results and testbeds specifically used to evaluate the system performance for those edge-AI systems. In this paper, we attempt to design a benchmark test platform for the edge-AI devices and evaluate six mainstream edge devices that are equipped with different computing powers and AI chip architectures. Throughput, power consumption ratio, and cost-effectiveness are chosen as the performance metrics for the evaluation process. Three classic deep learning workloads: object detection, image classification, and natural language processing are adopted with different batch sizes. The results show that under different batch sizes, compared with traditional edge devices, edge devices equipped with AI chips have out-performance in throughput, power consumption ratio, and cost-effectiveness by 134×, 57×, and 32×, respectively. From system perspective, our work not only demonstrates the effective AI capabilities of those edge AI devices, but also provide suggestions for AI optimization at edge in details.","PeriodicalId":309508,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 27th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 27th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPADS53394.2021.00031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advances in Edge AI make it possible to achieve inference deep learning for emerging applications, e.g., smart transportation and smart city on the edge in real-time. Nowadays, different industry companies have developed several edge AI devices with various architectures. However, it is hard for application users to justify how to choose the appropriate edge-AI, due to the lack of benchmark testing results and testbeds specifically used to evaluate the system performance for those edge-AI systems. In this paper, we attempt to design a benchmark test platform for the edge-AI devices and evaluate six mainstream edge devices that are equipped with different computing powers and AI chip architectures. Throughput, power consumption ratio, and cost-effectiveness are chosen as the performance metrics for the evaluation process. Three classic deep learning workloads: object detection, image classification, and natural language processing are adopted with different batch sizes. The results show that under different batch sizes, compared with traditional edge devices, edge devices equipped with AI chips have out-performance in throughput, power consumption ratio, and cost-effectiveness by 134×, 57×, and 32×, respectively. From system perspective, our work not only demonstrates the effective AI capabilities of those edge AI devices, but also provide suggestions for AI optimization at edge in details.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择合适的支持人工智能的边缘设备,而不是昂贵的设备
边缘人工智能的进步使得在边缘实时实现智能交通和智慧城市等新兴应用的推理深度学习成为可能。如今,不同的行业公司开发了几种具有不同架构的边缘人工智能设备。然而,由于缺乏专门用于评估这些边缘人工智能系统性能的基准测试结果和测试平台,应用程序用户很难证明如何选择适当的边缘人工智能。在本文中,我们尝试为边缘AI设备设计一个基准测试平台,并评估六种主流边缘设备,这些设备配备了不同的计算能力和AI芯片架构。选择吞吐量、功耗比和成本效益作为评估过程的性能指标。采用了三种经典的深度学习工作负载:对象检测、图像分类和自然语言处理,并采用了不同的批处理规模。结果表明,在不同批量下,与传统边缘设备相比,搭载AI芯片的边缘设备在吞吐量、功耗比和成本效益方面分别高出134倍、57倍和32倍。从系统的角度来看,我们的工作不仅展示了这些边缘人工智能设备的有效人工智能能力,而且为边缘人工智能优化提供了详细的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Choosing Appropriate AI-enabled Edge Devices, Not the Costly Ones Collaborative Transmission over Intermediate Links in Duty-Cycle WSNs Efficient Asynchronous GCN Training on a GPU Cluster A Forecasting Method of Dual Traffic Condition Indicators Based on Ensemble Learning Simple yet Efficient Deployment of Scientific Applications in the Cloud
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1