Evaluation of Digital Transformation of Government: Russian and international systems of indicators

M. Ivanova, Victoria Degtereva, G. Lukin
{"title":"Evaluation of Digital Transformation of Government: Russian and international systems of indicators","authors":"M. Ivanova, Victoria Degtereva, G. Lukin","doi":"10.1145/3372177.3373330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Russian government has started the reforms based on digital transformation ideas in 2010. The reforms resulted in successful installation of quite advanced infrastructure of digital government. By E-government development index Russia is now in the group of very-high performing countries. Other ratings did not show the same success of the country in other areas of economy, governance and political life. Although digitalization enhances accountability, efficiency and transparency of government, help to reduce costs and lead to better governance, there are examples when countries do not reach these goals despite the implementation of digital technologies. An important part of it is poorly designed strategy of reforms. Particularly, the case when the indicators of achievement the goals of digitalization do not conform closely to what is widely thought to be the modern digital government. In this case even actual accomplishment of the targeted values cannot testify existence of a working e-government. The objectives of this research are to analyze the system of indicators that the Russian government set for the digital reform and to compare this system to international evaluation systems and theoretical background. The research question is whether the indicators that government set can really show the transformation to the digital government. Using analysis of e-government objectives and indicators stated in the adopted legislative acts and their relation with international digital and e-government common goals and the indicators the authors have tried to analyze the reasons why successful performance in e-government reforms in Russia did not lead to new quality of governance. The analysis showed that the system of evaluation of e-government does not meet the requirements and even the proper values of all the indicators will not help to implement real digitalization.","PeriodicalId":368926,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 International SPBPU Scientific Conference on Innovations in Digital Economy","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 International SPBPU Scientific Conference on Innovations in Digital Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3372177.3373330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Russian government has started the reforms based on digital transformation ideas in 2010. The reforms resulted in successful installation of quite advanced infrastructure of digital government. By E-government development index Russia is now in the group of very-high performing countries. Other ratings did not show the same success of the country in other areas of economy, governance and political life. Although digitalization enhances accountability, efficiency and transparency of government, help to reduce costs and lead to better governance, there are examples when countries do not reach these goals despite the implementation of digital technologies. An important part of it is poorly designed strategy of reforms. Particularly, the case when the indicators of achievement the goals of digitalization do not conform closely to what is widely thought to be the modern digital government. In this case even actual accomplishment of the targeted values cannot testify existence of a working e-government. The objectives of this research are to analyze the system of indicators that the Russian government set for the digital reform and to compare this system to international evaluation systems and theoretical background. The research question is whether the indicators that government set can really show the transformation to the digital government. Using analysis of e-government objectives and indicators stated in the adopted legislative acts and their relation with international digital and e-government common goals and the indicators the authors have tried to analyze the reasons why successful performance in e-government reforms in Russia did not lead to new quality of governance. The analysis showed that the system of evaluation of e-government does not meet the requirements and even the proper values of all the indicators will not help to implement real digitalization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政府数字化转型的评估:俄罗斯和国际指标体系
俄罗斯政府在2010年开始了基于数字化转型理念的改革。改革的结果是成功安装了相当先进的数字政府基础设施。从电子政务发展指数来看,俄罗斯现在是表现非常出色的国家之一。其他评级并未显示该国在经济、治理和政治生活等其他领域取得同样的成功。虽然数字化提高了政府的问责制、效率和透明度,有助于降低成本并改善治理,但也有一些国家尽管实施了数字技术,但仍未能实现这些目标。其中一个重要原因是改革战略设计不当。特别是,当实现数字化目标的指标与被广泛认为是现代数字政府的指标不一致时。在这种情况下,即使目标价值的实际实现也不能证明电子政务的存在。本研究的目的是分析俄罗斯政府为数字改革设定的指标体系,并将该体系与国际评价体系和理论背景进行比较。研究的问题是政府设置的指标能否真正反映政府向数字政府的转型。通过分析所通过的立法法案中规定的电子政务目标和指标,以及它们与国际数字和电子政务共同目标和指标的关系,作者试图分析俄罗斯电子政务改革的成功表现没有带来新的治理质量的原因。分析表明,电子政务的评价体系不符合要求,即使各项指标的取值都不合理,也不利于实现真正的数字化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regional differentiation of digital economy development in the Russian Federation Features of the analysis of business processes of the company (on the example of customer service in a travel agency) Digitalization of the educational process: problematic issues in the context of the development of the digital economy Developing a Cybersecurity Risk Analysis System for High-Tech Equipment in Machine Industry Evaluation of Digital Transformation of Government: Russian and international systems of indicators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1