Formal Schedulability Analysis and Simulation for AADL

Shenglin Gui, Lei Luo, Yun Li, Lijie Wang
{"title":"Formal Schedulability Analysis and Simulation for AADL","authors":"Shenglin Gui, Lei Luo, Yun Li, Lijie Wang","doi":"10.1109/ICESS.2008.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With rapid developments in science and technology, we now see the ubiquitous use of different types of safety-critical systems in our daily lives such as in avionics, consumer electronics, and medical systems. In such systems, unintentional design faults might result in injury or even death to human beings. To make sure that safety-critical systems are really safe, only using the traditional methods is not enough. Model-Driven Architecture (MDA) method is becoming the mainstream as the instrument of the people. Architecture Analysis and Design Language (AADL) is a modeling language standard brought forward by the Society of Automotive Engineers, Avionics Systems Division, et al, is becoming a research topic for many organizations and institutes. It is a kind of MDA method also. For safety-critical systems, we must verify all the important properties whatever the method we use. Among the properties, the schedulability problem is a very important problem in the real-time software. But, how to solve the schedulability problem in a practical AADL project is a new obstacle to us. In this paper, we use the linear hybrid automata to abstract the semantics of the software components explicitly, then try to use TIMES tool developed by Uppsala Univ and Furness tool developed by Fremont Associates, LLC to simulate the semantics of linear hybrid automata and the scheduling execution trace of AADL software components respectively. Finally, we compare the two methods and make a conclusion.","PeriodicalId":278372,"journal":{"name":"2008 International Conference on Embedded Software and Systems","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 International Conference on Embedded Software and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICESS.2008.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

With rapid developments in science and technology, we now see the ubiquitous use of different types of safety-critical systems in our daily lives such as in avionics, consumer electronics, and medical systems. In such systems, unintentional design faults might result in injury or even death to human beings. To make sure that safety-critical systems are really safe, only using the traditional methods is not enough. Model-Driven Architecture (MDA) method is becoming the mainstream as the instrument of the people. Architecture Analysis and Design Language (AADL) is a modeling language standard brought forward by the Society of Automotive Engineers, Avionics Systems Division, et al, is becoming a research topic for many organizations and institutes. It is a kind of MDA method also. For safety-critical systems, we must verify all the important properties whatever the method we use. Among the properties, the schedulability problem is a very important problem in the real-time software. But, how to solve the schedulability problem in a practical AADL project is a new obstacle to us. In this paper, we use the linear hybrid automata to abstract the semantics of the software components explicitly, then try to use TIMES tool developed by Uppsala Univ and Furness tool developed by Fremont Associates, LLC to simulate the semantics of linear hybrid automata and the scheduling execution trace of AADL software components respectively. Finally, we compare the two methods and make a conclusion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AADL的形式化可调度性分析与仿真
随着科学技术的快速发展,我们现在看到在我们的日常生活中无处不在的使用不同类型的安全关键系统,如航空电子设备,消费电子产品和医疗系统。在这样的系统中,无意的设计错误可能会导致人类受伤甚至死亡。为了确保安全关键系统的真正安全,仅使用传统方法是不够的。模型驱动架构(MDA)方法作为人们的工具正在成为主流。体系结构分析与设计语言(AADL)是由美国汽车工程师学会、航空电子系统部等提出的一种建模语言标准,正成为许多组织和研究机构的研究课题。它也是一种MDA方法。对于安全关键型系统,无论使用何种方法,我们都必须验证所有重要的属性。其中,可调度性问题是实时软件中一个非常重要的问题。但是,如何在实际的AADL工程中解决可调度性问题是一个新的难题。本文采用线性混合自动机对软件组件的语义进行了显式抽象,并尝试分别使用Uppsala大学开发的TIMES工具和Fremont Associates, LLC开发的Furness工具对线性混合自动机的语义和AADL软件组件的调度执行轨迹进行了仿真。最后对两种方法进行比较,得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Efficient Multi-protocol RFID Interrogator Baseband Processor based on a Reconfigurable Architecture Schedulability Analysis for Fault-Tolerant Hard Real-Time Tasks with Arbitrary Large Deadlines Energy Efficiency of Scratch-Pad Memory at 65 nm and Below: An Empirical Study Formal Schedulability Analysis and Simulation for AADL An Entropy-based Trust Modeling and Evaluation for Wireless Sensor Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1